Potential energy Hartree-Fock functions

Each unsealed 0 at a specific R, in the case of diatomic molecules, gives rise to a scaled energy curve the envelope of a family of such curves can be taken to be the optimal intemuclear potential energy. Exact wave functions, minimal STO-SCF wave functions optmized with respect to coefficients and orbital exponents, and Hartree-Fock wave functions yield the optimal intemuclear potential-energy curves which satisfy the virial. At the minimum in the optimal PE-curve (—V /2 R ) will be unity. McLean uses the Dunham analysis (3b) to determine the spectroscopic constants through the potential curve... 

Fig. 4 Potential energy curves for the hydrogen molecule obtained from (a) the Hartree-Fock function [96], (b) the ODC multiconfiguration self-consistent field flmction, (c) the generalized Coulson-Fischer function [77] and (d) the extended James-CooUdge flmction of Krfos and...

A Hbasis functions provides K molecular orbitals, but lUJiW of these will not be occupied by smy electrons they are the virtual spin orbitals. If u c were to add an electron to one of these virtual orbitals then this should provide a means of calculating the electron affinity of the system. Electron affinities predicted by Konpman s theorem are always positive when Hartree-Fock calculations are used, because fhe irtucil orbitals always have a positive energy. However, it is observed experimentally that many neutral molecules will accept an electron to form a stable anion and so have negative electron affinities. This can be understood if one realises that electron correlation uDiild be expected to add to the error due to the frozen orbital approximation, rather ihan to counteract it as for ionisation potentials. 

So far there have not been any restrictions on the MOs used to build the determinantal trial wave function. The Slater determinant has been written in terms of spinorbitals, eq. (3.20), being products of a spatial orbital times a spin function (a or /3). If there are no restrictions on the form of the spatial orbitals, the trial function is an Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) wave function. The term Different Orbitals for Different Spins (DODS) is also sometimes used. If the interest is in systems with an even number of electrons and a singlet type of wave function (a closed shell system), the restriction that each spatial orbital should have two electrons, one with a and one with /3 spin, is normally made. Such wave functions are known as Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF). Open-shell systems may also be described by restricted type wave functions, where the spatial part of the doubly occupied orbitals is forced to be the same this is known as Restricted Open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF). For open-shell species a UHF treatment leads to well-defined orbital energies, which may be interpreted as ionization potentials. Section 3.4. For an ROHF wave function it is not possible to chose a unitary transformation which makes the matrix of Lagrange multipliers in eq. (3.40) diagonal, and orbital energies from an ROHF wave function are consequently not uniquely defined, and cannot be equated to ionization potentials by a Koopman type argument. 

One is purely formal, it concerns the departure from symmetry of an approximate solution of the Schrodinger equation for the electrons (ie within the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation). The most famous case is the symmetry-breaking of the solutions of the Hartree-Fock equations [1-4]. The other symmetry-breaking concerns the appearance of non symmetrical conformations of minimum potential energy. This phenomenon of deviation of the molecular structure from symmetry is so familiar, confirmed by a huge amount of physical evidences, of which chirality (i.e. the existence of optical isomers) was the oldest one, that it is well accepted. However, there are many problems where the Hartree-Fock symmetry breaking of the wave function for a symmetrical nuclear conformation and the deformation of the nuclear skeleton are internally related, obeying the same laws. And it is one purpose of the present review to stress on that internal link. 

To understand how Kohn and Sham tackled this problem, we go back to the discussion of the Hartree-Fock scheme in Chapter 1. There, our wave function was a single Slater determinant SD constructed from N spin orbitals. While the Slater determinant enters the HF method as the approximation to the true N-electron wave function, we showed in Section 1.3 that 4>sd can also be looked upon as the exact wave function of a fictitious system of N non-interacting electrons (that is electrons which behave as uncharged fermions and therefore do not interact with each other via Coulomb repulsion), moving in the elfective potential VHF. For this type of wave function the kinetic energy can be exactly expressed as... 

---