Selective pore volume

In addition to surface area, pore size distribution, and surface chemistry, other important properties of commercial activated carbon products include pore volume, particle size distribution, apparent or bulk density, particle density, abrasion resistance, hardness, and ash content. The range of these and other properties is illustrated in Table 1 together with specific values for selected commercial grades of powdered, granular, and shaped activated carbon products used in Hquid- or gas-phase appHcations (19). 

The resolution required in any analytical SEC procedure, e.g., to detect sample impurities, is primarily based on the nature of the sample components with respect to their shape, the relative size differences of species contained in the sample, and the minimal size difference to be resolved. These sample attributes, in addition to the range of sizes to be examined, determine the required selectivity. Earlier work has shown that the limit of resolvability in SEC of molecules [i.e., the ability to completely resolve solutes of different sizes as a function of (1) plate number, (2) different solute shapes, and (3) media pore volumes] ranges from close to 20% for the molecular mass difference required to resolve spherical solutes down to near a 10% difference in molecular mass required for the separation of rod-shaped molecules (Hagel, 1993). To approach these limits, a SEC medium and a system with appropriate selectivity and efficiency must be employed. 

The important parameters to consider are the selectivity (dKJdlogR), the ratio of pore volume, Vp, over void volume, Vq, the plate height, H, and the column length, L. The distribution coefficient, Kq, has a slight effect on resolution (with an optimum at Kp 0.3-0.5). In addition to this, extra column effects, such as sample volume, may also contribute to the resolution. 

The main criterium for column selection is pore size distribution as it is desirable to have maximum pore volume for separation in the molecular weight range of interest. Having determined the upper molecular weight limit required, a column with a suitable exclusion limit should be selected. In the case of individual pore size columns, it is then a question of selecting other columns with complementary calibration curves to comprise a column set covering the re-... 

Most size exclusion chromatography (SEC) practitioners select their columns primarily to cover the molar mass area of interest and to ensure compatibility with the mobile phase(s) applied. A further parameter to judge is the column efficiency expressed, e.g., by the theoretical plate count or related values, which are measured by appropriate low molar mass probes. It follows the apparent linearity of the calibration dependence and the attainable selectivity of separation the latter parameter is in turn connected with the width of the molar mass range covered by the column and depends on both the pore size distribution and the pore volume of the packing material. Other important column parameters are the column production repeatability, availability, and price. Unfortunately, the interactive properties of SEC columns are often overlooked. 

Unfortunately, exclusion chromatography has some inherent disadvantages that make its selection as the separation method of choice a little difficult. Although the separation is based on molecular size, which might be considered an ideal rationale, the total separation must be contained in the pore volume of the stationary phase. That is to say all the solutes must be eluted between the excluded volume and the dead volume, which is approximately half the column dead volume. In a 25 cm long, 4.6 mm i.d. column packed with silica gel, this means that all the solutes must be eluted in about 2 ml of mobile phase. It follows, that to achieve a reasonable separation of a multi-component mixture, the peaks must be very narrow and each occupy only a few microliters of mobile phase. Scott and Kucera (9) constructed a column 14 meters long and 1 mm i.d. packed with 5ja... 

The incrrase of surface area and pore volume enhanced the production of ethylbenzene by promoting further hydrogenation of the degraded styrene fragments. High degradation temperature favored the selectivity to styrene monomer. 

Several techniques for VOC removal have been investigated such as thermal incineration, catalytic oxidation, condensation, absorption, bio-filtration, adsorption, and membrane separation. VOCs are present in many types of waste gases and are often removed by adsorption [1]. Activated carbon (AC) is commonly used as an adsorbent of gases and vapors because of its developed surface area and large pore volumes [2]. Modification techniques for AC have been used to increase surface adsorption and hence removal capacity, as well as to improve selectivity to organic compounds [3]. 

The following natural precursors have been selected for KOH activation coal (C), coal semi-coke (CS), pitch semi-coke (PS) and pitch mesophase (PM). An industrial activated carbon (AC) was also used. Activation was performed at 800°C in KOH with 4 1 (C KOH) weight ratio, for 5 hours, followed by a careful washing of the samples with 10% HC1 and distilled water. The activation process supplied highly microporous carbons with BET specific surface areas from 1900 to 3150 m2/g. The BET surface area together with the micro and the total pore volume of the KOH-activated carbons are presented in Table 1. The mean micropore width calculated from the Dubinin equation is designed as LD. 

Aside from N2 adsorption, Kr or Ar adsorption can be used at low temperatures to determine low (<1 m2/g) surface areas [46], Chemically sensitive probes such as H2, Oz, or CO can also be employed to selectively measure surface areas of specific components of the catalyst (see below). Finally, mercury-based porosimeters, where the volume of the mercury incorporated into the pores is measured as a function of increasing (well above atmospheric) pressures, are sometimes used to determine the size of meso- and macropores [1]. By and large, the limitations of all of the above methods are that they only provide information on average pore volumes, and that they usually lack chemical sensitivity. 

---