Population confidence level

There will be incidences when the foregoing assumptions for a two-tailed test will not be true. Perhaps some physical situation prevents p from ever being less than the hypothesized value it can only be equal or greater. No results would ever fall below the low end of the confidence interval only the upper end of the distribution is operative. Now random samples will exceed the upper bound only 2.5% of the time, not the 5% specified in two-tail testing. Thus, where the possible values are restricted, what was supposed to be a hypothesis test at the 95% confidence level is actually being performed at a 97.5% confidence level. Stated in another way, 95% of the population data lie within the interval below p + 1.65cr and 5% lie above. Of course, the opposite situation might also occur and only the lower end of the distribution is operative. 

In fact, a measure of the degree of confidence can be gained from the t calculation. Shown in Appendix A are columns for greater degrees of confidence. The value for df = 4 for a 98% confidence level is 3.747 and it can be seen that the experimentally calculated value is also greater than this value. Therefore, the level of confidence that these samples came from different populations is raised to 98%. However, the level of confidence in believing that these two samples came from separate populations does not extend to 99% (t = 4.604). Therefore, at the 98% confidence level this analysis indicates that the potency of human calcitonin is effectively increased by enrichment of G -protein in the cell. 

B-basis The B mechanical property value is the value above which at least 90% of the population of values is expected to fall, with a confidence level of 95%. See A-basis population confidence interval S-basis typical basis. 

Figure 1.18. The Student s ( resp. t/Vn for various confidence levels are plotted the curves for p = 0.05 are enhanced. The other curves are for p = 0.5 (bottom), 0.2, 0.1, 0.02, 0.01, 0.002, 0.001, and 0.0001 (top). By plotting a horizontal, the number of measurements necessary to obtain the same confidence intervals for different confidence levels can be estimated. While it takes n - 9 measurements (/ = 8) for a t-value of 7.12 and p = 0.0001, just n = 3 f - 2) will give the same limits on the population for p = 0.02 (line A - C). For the CL on the mean, in order to obtain the same t/ /n for p = 0.02 as for p = 0.0001, it will take n = 4 measurements (line B ) note the difference between points D and ...

The mouse bioassay for PSP, described in its original form by Sommer in 1937 (29), involves i.p. injection of a test solution, typically 1 mL, into a mouse weighing 17-23 g, and observing the time from injection to death. From the death time and mouse weight, the number of mouse units is obtained by reference to a standard table 1 mouse unit is defined as the amount of toxin that will kill a 20-g mouse in 15 min (77). The sensitivity of the mouse population used is calibrated using reference standard saxitoxin (70). In practice, the concentration of the test solution is adjusted to result in death times of approximately 6 min. Once the correct dilution has been established, 5 mice will generally provide a result differing by less than 20% from the true value at the 95% confidence level. The use of this method for the various saxitoxins and indeterminate mixtures of them would appear... 

A method and Worksheet for comparing correlation coefficients for different size populations at user selected confidence levels. 

If the population standard deviation is known and the mean is estimated from one measurement, for a confidence level of 95 % the trae value will lie in the range of x 1.96 a. If the mean is estimated from n measurements the range has to be divided by 4n. ... 

CL for the population mean, estimated from n measurements on a confidence level of 95%... 

According to Table 13, the cap was present for each bottle sampled however, the lip seal was not fully adhered in 16 instances. The proportion of defectives in the samples is 16/15,600 or 0.001 (0.1% or 1/1000). The maximum fraction defective for an incomplete lip seal in the population (production lots) is 0.0018 at the 99% confidence level. Stated another way, there is 99% assurance that the number of bottles with an incompletely adhered seal will not exceed two units for every 1000 produced. The value has been calculated for the other quality attributes to illustrate the impact of the sample size and the different levels of machine performance on lot defectives. 

A tolerance interval is an interval that contains at least a specified proportion P of the population with a specified degree of confidence, 100(1 - a)%. This allows a manufacturer to specify that at a certain confidence level at least a fraction of size P of the total items manufactured will lie within a given interval. The form of the equation is... 

Note for any stated confidence level, the confidence interval about the mean is the narrowest interval, the prediction interval for a single future observation is wider, and the tolerance interval (to contain 95% of the population) is the widest.]... 

Excavated soil suspected of containing lead has been stockpiled. We may use this soil as backfill if the mean lead concentration is below the action level of lOOmg/kg. To decide if the soil is acceptable as backfill, we will sample the soil and analyze it for lead. The mean concentration of lead in soil will represent the statistical population parameter. The theoretical decision rule, the baseline and the alternative conditions, and the null and alternative hypotheses have been stated in Examples 2.1 and 2.2. The assigned probability limits are a —ft — 0.05. This means that the false acceptance error rate is 0.05. The probability of making a correct decision is 0.95 or the confidence level is 95 percent. 

Relative standard deviation of repeat HPLC analysis of a drug metabolite standard was between 2 and 5%. Preliminary measurements of several serum samples via solid-phase extraction cleanup followed by HPLC analyses showed that the analyte concentration was between 5 and 15 mg/L and the standard deviation was 2.5 mg/L. The extraction step clearly increased the random error of the overall process. Calculate the number of samples required so that the sample mean would be within +1.2 mg/L of the population mean at the 95% confidence level. 

In terms of the previously mentioned normal distribution, the probability that a randomly selected observation x from a total population of data will be within so many units of the true mean p can be calculated. However, this leads to an integral which is difficult to evaluate. To overcome this difficulty, tables have been developed in terms of p Ztrue standard deviation a of a particular normal distribution under study is known and assuming that the difference between the sample x and the true mean p is only the result of chance and that the individual observations are normally distributed, then a confidence interval in estimating p can be determined. This measure was referred to previously as the confidence level. 

If the assumption of a Gaussian error distribution is considered valid, then an additional method of expressing random errors is available, based on confidence levels. The equation for this distribution can be manipulated to show that approximately 95% of all the data will lie within 2 5 of the mean, and 99.7% of the data will lie within 3i of the mean. Similarly, when the sampling distribution of the mean is considered, 95% of the sample means will lie within approximately 2sj /n of the population mean etc. (Figure 5). 

Considering Fig. 5.6, we observe that, if we have a very high confidence level, then 1 — a l and the domain for the existence of parameters (p, o ) is high. As far as our scope is to produce the relations between the population and the selection characteristics, i.e. between the couples (p, o ) and (x, s ), we can write Eq. (5.17) in a state that introduces the mean value (x) and volume (n) of the selection. In relation (5.34) the population mean value has been divided into n parts. Now, if for each interval aj i — a , the population mean value is compared with the mean... 

The power of the statistical test is a quantitative measure of the ability to differentiate accurately differences in populations. The usual case in toxicity testing is the comparison of a treatment group to control group. Depending on the expected variability of the data and the confidence level chosen, an enormous sample size or number of replicates may be required to achieve the necessary discrimination. If the sample size or replication is too large, then the experimental design may have to be altered. 

Now, let us take a closer look at expression (4). The value at the center, p, is the population mean, which is the unknown quantity we are estimating. The two expressions on the right-hand and the left-hand sides of (4) are variables calculated from the data. Thus, expression (4) represents a random interval containing the population mean p. Expression (3) assigns a probability 1 — y that (4) holds. The interpretation of this is that if we conduct an experiment and calculate the lower and upper limits of the interval, Ly and Uy, respectively, then the interval (Ly, Uy) will contain the true (and unknown ) population mean with probability 1 — y. The interval (4) is called a confidence interval for the population mean, and 1 — y is called the confidence level of the interval, often expressed as a percent. 

Let us illustrate these ideas using the data of Table 25.4. Suppose we wish to estimate the difference A between the population means of the non-exercising and the exercising students by constructing a confidence interval with confidence level 95%. Then substituting D for X and SEq for o/y/n in (4), and recalling that Z(0.05) =... 

---