Polymeric membranes molecular weight

The cDNAs of the cA-prenyltransferase of H. brasiliensis was successfully identified and expressed in E. coli. The in vitro polymerization of IPP after initiation with FPP using the expressed c/x-prenyltransferase resulted in low degrees of polymerization [267, 268]. After addition of rubber particles to this polymerization, the molecular weight increased tremendously [269], It can be concluded that the rubber particles are essential for rubber biosynthesis. Katarina Cornish established a detailed structural model of the in vivo synthesis of natural rubber in the rubber particle monolayer membrane and partially explained this behavior (see Fig. 12) [251],... 

A straightforward way to collect solutes from the interstitial fluid (ISF) space would be to have a semipermeable, hollow fiber, membrane-based device as originally described by Bito et al.1 Two semipermeable membrane-based devices that have been used to collect different types of analytes from various mammalian tissues include microdialysis sampling probes (catheters) and ultrafiltration probes. The heart of each of these devices is the semipermeable polymeric membrane shown in Figure 6.1. The membranes allow for collection of analytes from the ISF that are below the membrane molecular weight cutoff (MWCO). Each of these devices provides a sample that has a significantly reduced amount of protein when compared to either blood or tissue... 

Enzymes are covalently immobilized primarily onto the surface of the membrane exposed to the feed solution, known as the "active side" of the asymmetric membrane. In general, it is not clear whether reaction between enzymes and polymeric membranes via coupling agents simply results in enzyme attachment to the membrane, or if it leads to an enzyme-carrier network inside the polymer matrix. For the sake of simplicity let us assume that asymmetric membranes are used, that suitable active groups are available on the polymeric surface and that the membrane molecular weight cut-off is such that the active layer is enzyme-impermeable. In this way, even though their activity is often drastically reduced, surface bound enzymes are in close proximity to the substrate solution-thus reducing the mass transfer resistance to that associated with the boundary layer. When enzymes are covalently immobilized in the... 

CPA. Copolymer alloy membranes (CPAs) are made by alloying high molecular weight polymeries, plasticizers, special stabilizers, biocides, and antioxidants with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC). The membrane is typically reinforced with polyester and comes in finished thicknesses of 0.75—1.5 mm and widths of 1.5—1.8 m. The primary installation method is mechanically fastened, but some fully adhered systems are also possible. The CPA membranes can exhibit long-term flexibiHty by alleviating migration of the polymeric plasticizers, and are chemically resistant and compatible with many oils and greases, animal fats, asphalt, and coal-tar pitch. The physical characteristics of a CPA membrane have been described (15). 

Polyelectrolyte complex membranes are phase-inversion membranes where polymeric anions and cations react during the gelation. The reaction is suppressed before gelation by incorporating low molecular weight electrolytes or counterions in the solvent system. Both neutral and charged membranes are formed in this manner (14,15). These membranes have not been exploited commercially because of then lack of resistance to chemicals. 

The polymeric products from disordered AG have much smaller molecular weights and reduced tendency to self-associate in solution. Such properties may be desirable in applications requiring membrane permeability. 

To find a suitable membrane for a certain application, an important parameter is the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO). The MWCO is defined as the molecular weight at which 90% of the solutes are retained by the membrane. It should be taken into account that the pore size of many ultra- and nano filtration membranes is greatly influenced by the solvent and by the temperature used under experimental conditions. This particularly concerns polymeric membranes as will be discussed in the next paragraph. 

Dense membranes are a special type of polymeric membranes. Jacobs et al. published on the use of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) dense membranes in the hydrogenation of dimethylitaconate and acetophenone using standard homogeneous catalysts (see Section 4.6.1)[48]. The membranes were homemade from a PDMS solution in hexane, which was cross-linked in a vacuum oven at 100°C. The membranes were able almost completely to retain unmodified Ru-BINAP dissolved in isopropanol. However, as mentioned earlier, these applications will strongly depend on the size, i.e. molecular weight, of the substrate to be converted in order to guarantee a sufficient difference in size of the product and the catalyst to be retained. 

The high diffusion coefficient of low molecular weight polycations renders them particularly effective in membrane formation. This is particularly true for polymeric chelating agents. 

Only a very small reduction in the number of acid-insoluble SH-groups in platelets was seen in the presence of feverfew extract [52]. A change in the high molecular weight protein pattern was only seen after the platelets had been activated. Such changes are indicative of polymerization of the proteins and the formation of S-S bridges and this can lead to disturbances in membrane-cytoskeletal interactions. Uptake of [ " C]arachidonic acid into phospholipids was inhibited by feverfew [53], which may be a result of altered cytoskeletal-membrane interaction. 

Kragl 13) pioneered the use of membranes to recycle dendritic catalysts. Initially, he used soluble polymeric catalysts in a CFMR for the enantioselective addition of Et2Zn to benzaldehyde. The ligand a,a-diphenyl-(L)-prolinol was coupled to a copolymer prepared from 2-hydroxyethyl methyl acrylate and octadecyl methyl acrylate (molecular weight 96,000 Da). The polymer was retained with a retention factor > 0.998 when a polyaramide ultrafiltration membrane (Hoechst Nadir UF PA20) was used. The enantioselectivity obtained with the polymer-supported catalyst was lower than that obtained with the monomeric ligand (80% ee vs 97% ee), but the activity of the catalyst was similar to that of the monomeric catalyst. This result is in contrast to observations with catalysts in which the ligand was coupled to an insoluble support, which led to a 20% reduction of the catalytic activity. 

---