Polymer bond strength

In general, covalent bonds govern the thermal and photochemical stability of polymers. Bond strength can be used as a clue to degradation mechanisms. For example, sulfur-vulcanized rubber is more likely to degrade at the comparatively weak S—S bonds than at the strong C—C bonds, both of which occur in the structure. 

Adhesives. Acryhc emulsion and solution polymers form the basis of a variety of adhesive types. The principal use is in pressure-sensitive adhesives, where a film of a very low T (<—20 " C) acrylic polymer or copolymer is used on the adherent side of tapes, decals, and labels. Acrylics provide a good balance of tack and bond strength with exceptional color stabiUty and resistance to aging (201,202). AcryUcs also find use in numerous types of constmction adhesive formulations and as film-to-film laminating adhesives (qv). 

Carboxylated polymers such as AF use similar but not identical compounds. The higher strength, especially hot bond strength, is due to the interaction of the carboxyl groups on the polymer chain with the metal oxides. The crystallization rate of AF is low and does not contribute to bond strength. Manufacture of adhesive compounds from AF is more demanding than manufacture of those from AD. 

ABS plastic, a polymer consisting of polybutadiene spheroids is dispersed in a continuous phase of poly(styrene—acrylonitrile). The chromic acid attacks the polybutadiene at a much higher rate than the continuous phase. This gives an excellent microroughened surface with superior metal-to-plastic bond strength. A typical recommended formulation consists of 20 vol % sulfuric acid, 420 g/L chromic acid, and 0.1—1.0% of a fluorocarbon wetting agent. The plastic is treated with this formulation for 6—10 min at 60—65°C. 

The primary challenge facing adhesive bonding of metals is to obtain sufficient durability of a bonded structure. Initial bond strength in metal-polymer adhesive joints is almost invariably excellent. Challenging the application of adhesives in polymer-polymer joining, however, is the problem of obtaining a joint that is... 

The most common use of curing agents is with carboxylic latices. Isocyanates and melamines can be used but zinc oxide is the most common curing agent. Zinc oxide cross-links carboxylated latices and improves bond strength by ionomer formation [78]. Carboxylated polychloroprene reacts slowly with zinc oxide in dispersed form, causing a gradual increase in adhesive gel content. This can lead to restricted adhesive shelf life. Resin acid sites compete with the polymer acid sites for Zn(II). The more resin acid sites, the more stable the adhesive. 

Even the earliest reports discuss the use of components such as polymer syrups bearing carboxylic acid functionality as a minor component to improve adhesion [21]. Later, methacrylic acid was specifically added to adhesive compositions to increase the rate of cure [22]. Maleic acid (or dibasic acids capable of cyclic tautomerism) have also been reported to increase both cure rate and bond strength [23]. Maleic acid has also been reported to improve adhesion to polymeric substrates such as Nylon and epoxies [24]. Adducts of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and various anhydrides (such as phthalic) have also been reported as acid-bearing monomers [25]. Organic acids have a specific role in the cure of some blocked organoboranes, as will be discussed later. 

The PVF is made by acidic reaction between poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and formaldehyde. The poly(vinyl alcohol) is, in turn, made by hydrolysis of poly(vinyl acetate) or transesterification of poly(vinyl acetate). Thus, residual alcohol and ester functionality is usually present. Cure reportedly occurs through reaction of phenolic polymer hydroxyls with the residual hydroxyls of the PVA [199]. The ester residues are observed to reduce bond strength in PVF-based systems [199]. This does not necessarily extend to PVF-P adhesives. PVF is stable in strong alkali, so participation of the acetals in curing is probably unimportant in most situations involving resoles. PVF is physically compatible with many phenolic resins. 

X 10 N and the value obtained by the simplest form, 1.45 X 10 " N m n = 918 and a = 0.31 nm for Equation 21.1). These comparisons imphed that the measurements were consistent with the theoretical predictions. The deviation between the rupture length of 260.9 nm and the fitted-contour length indicated that the polymer chain was not fully stretched at the rupture event. The reason for this was that the rupture event was a stochastic process and was dependent on many factors such as pulling speed, bond strength, and temperature. The vahdity of the freely jointed (FJC) model (dashed fine) was also checked ... 

---