Poly polymer blends

Figure 9.7-1 Experimental cloud-point curve of the polymer blend Poly(methyl methacrylate)/Poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile (28%AN)) as a function of pressure.

Since there had not been any measurements of thermal diffusion and Soret coefficients in polymer blends, the first task was the investigation of the Soret effect in the model polymer blend poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) and poly(ethyl-methyl siloxane) (PEMS). This polymer system has been chosen because of its conveniently located lower miscibility gap with a critical temperature that can easily be adjusted within the experimentally interesting range between room temperature and 100 °C by a suitable choice of the molar masses [81, 82], Furthermore, extensive characterization work has already been done for PDMS/PEMS blends, including the determination of activation energies and Flory-Huggins interaction parameters [7, 8, 83, 84],... 

Miles IS, ZurekA (1988) Preparation, structure, and properties of two-phase co-continuous polymer blends. Poly Eng Sci 28 796... 

Dielectric loss e" of miscible blends of poly(2-chlorostyrene) (P2CS450 Mp2cs = 4.5 x 10 ) and poly (vinyl methyl ether) (PVME96 Mpvme = 9.6 x 10 ) with various P2CS volume fractions ( )p2cs measured at 1 kHz at various temperatures. (Data taken, with permission, from Urakawa, O., Y. Fuse, H. Hori, Q. Tran-Cong, and O. Yano. 2001. A dielectric study on the local dynamics of miscible polymer blends Poly(2-chlorostyrene)/poly(vinyl methyl ether). Polymer 42 765-773.)... 

Urakawa, O., Y. Fuse, H. Hori, Q. Tran-Cong, and O. Yano. 2001. A dielectric study on the local dynamics of miscible polymer blends Poly(2-chlorostyrene)/ poly(vinyl methyl ether). Polymer 42 765-773. 

Figure 4.25. (a) The mutual diffusion coefficient in the miscible polymer blend poly(vinyl chloride)-polycaprolactone (PVC-PCL) at 91 °C, as measured by x-ray microanalysis in the scanning electron microscope (Jones et al. 1986). The solid line is a fit assuming that the mutual diffusion coefficient is given by equation (4.4.11), with the composition dependence of the tracer diffusion coefficient of the PCL given by a combination of equations (4.4.9) and (4.4.10). The tracer diffusion coefficient of the PVC is assumed to be small in comparison, (b) The calculated profile of diffusion between pure PVC and pure PCL, on the basis of the concentration dependence of the mutual diffusion coefficient shown in (a). The reduced length u — where the... 

Chopra Divya, Vlassopoulos Dimitris, and Hatzikiriakos Savvas. Nonlinear rheological response of phase separating polymer blends Poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate). J. Rheol. 44 no. 1 (2000) 27-45. 

Vlassopoulos Dimitris. Rheology of LCST polymer blends Poly(styrene-co-maleic anhy-drite)/poly(methyl methacrylate). Rheol. Acta. 35 no. 6 (1996) 556-566. 

Polymer Blends. Commercial blends of nylon with other polymers have also been produced in order to obtain a balance of the properties of the two materials or to reduce moisture uptake. Blends of nylon-6,6 with poly(phenylene oxide) have been most successflil, but blends of nylon-6,6 and nylon-6 with polypropylene have also been introduced. 

Sulfonation has been used to change some characteristics of blends. Poly(2,6-diphenyl-l,4-phenylene oxide) and polystyrene are immiscible. However, when the polymers were functionalized by sulfonation, even though they remained immiscible when blended, the functionalization increased interfacial interactions and resulted in improved properties (65). In the case of DMPPO and poly(ethyl acrylate) the originally immiscible blends showed increased miscibility with sulfonation (66). 

Polymer Blends. The miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide) with a number of other polymers has been studied, eg, with poly (methyl methacrylate) (18—23), poly(vinyl acetate) (24—27), polyvinylpyrroHdinone (28), nylon (29), poly(vinyl alcohol) (30), phenoxy resins (31), cellulose (32), cellulose ethers (33), poly(vinyl chloride) (34), poly(lactic acid) (35), poly(hydroxybutyrate) (36), poly(acryhc acid) (37), polypropylene (38), and polyethylene (39). 

The effect of a second polymer blended with PPS which causes enhanced nucleation of PPS has been previously observed. It was found that low concentrations (1—2 wt %) of poly(phenylene sulfide ketone) and poly(ether ether ketone), when melt-blended with PPS, function effectively to increase the nucleation density of PPS (149). 

Common conductive polymers are poly acetylene, polyphenylene, poly-(phenylene sulfide), polypyrrole, and polyvinylcarba2ole (123) (see Electrically conductive polymers). A static-dissipative polymer based on a polyether copolymer has been aimounced (124). In general, electroconductive polymers have proven to be expensive and difficult to process. In most cases they are blended with another polymer to improve the processibiUty. Conductive polymers have met with limited commercial success. 

In situ preparation of polymer blends of 1,4-polybutadiene with polystyrene, or poly(l-butene) has been achieved by using the heterogeneous Ziegler-Natta type catalyst (C2H )2A1C1—Ti(OC4H )4 in the host polymers (217). Homogeneous catalysts can also be used to catalyze these reactions (218). 

Blends with PVC. Nitrile mbber may be blended with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) by the polymer producer by two different techniques (1) blending of NBR latex with PVC latex followed by co-coagulation and drying, or (2) physically mixing the soHd NBR and PVC powder in mixing equipment such as an internal mixer. NBR—PVC polymer blends are well known for the good ozone resistance that is imparted by the PVC. 

Because of the aqueous solubiUty of polyelectrolyte precursor polymers, another method of polymer blend formation is possible. The precursor polymer is co-dissolved with a water-soluble matrix polymer, and films of the blend are cast. With heating, the fully conjugated conducting polymer is generated to form the composite film. This technique has been used for poly(arylene vinylenes) with a variety of water-soluble matrix polymers, including polyacrjiamide, poly(ethylene oxide), polyvinylpyrroHdinone, methylceUulose, and hydroxypropylceUulose (139—141). These blends generally exhibit phase-separated morphologies. 

Following the success in blending rubbery materials into polystyrene, styrene-acrylonitrile and PVC materials to produce tough thermoplastics the concept has been used to produce high-impact PMMA-type moulding compounds. These are two-phase materials in which the glassy phase consists of poly(methyl methacrylate) and the rubbery phase an acrylate polymer, usually poly(butyl acrylate Commercial materials of the type include Diakon MX (ICI), Oroglas... 

Interfacial adhesion and, thereby, compatibility can be enhanced by the selective crosslinking reaction in polymer blends. Inoue and Suzuki [26] reported the properties of blends dynamically crosslinked PP-EPDM blends. The crosslinking agent was yV,N -/w-phenylene-bismaleimide - poly(2,2,4 - trimethyl - 1,2-dihydroquino -line) system. Increase in interfacial adhesion leads to... 

Chattopadhyay S., Chaki T.K., and Bhowmick A.K., New thermoplastic elastomers from poly(ethyle-neoctene) (engage), poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate) and low-density polyethylene by electron beam technology structural characterization and mechanical properties. Rubber Chem. TechnoL, 74, 815, 2001. Roy Choudhury N. and Dutta N.K., Thermoplastic elastomeric natural rubber-polypropylene blends with reference to interaction between the components. Advances in Polymer Blends and Alloys Technology, Vol. 5 (K. Finlayson, ed.), Technomic Publishers, Pensylvania, 1994, 161. 

---