Polycarbonate density

Properly ASTM Test Phenolic Chi onile Rigid Closed Cell Plienylcne Oxide Foam able Resin Polyethylene Medium- Polycarbonate Density Foam Polystyrene Polyurethane Rigid Closed Cell... 

Fig. 7. Raman microprobe spectra of (a) polystyrene [9003-33-6], (b) low density polyethylene, and (c) polycarbonate [24936-68-3].

Figure 6 shows the field dependence of hole mobiUty for TAPC-doped bisphenol A polycarbonate at various temperatures (37). The mobilities decrease with increasing field at low fields. At high fields, a log oc relationship is observed. The experimental results can be reproduced by Monte Carlo simulation, shown by soHd lines in Figure 6. The model predicts that the high field mobiUty follows the following equation (37) where d = a/kT (p is the width of the Gaussian distribution density of states), Z is a parameter that characterizes the degree of positional disorder, E is the electric field, is a prefactor mobihty, and Cis an empirical constant given as 2.9 X lO " (cm/V). ...

Fig. 6. Melt viscosity dependence on shear rate for various polymers A, low density polyethylene at 210°C B, polystyrene at 200°C C, UDEL P-1700 polysulfone at 360°C D, LEXAN 104 polycarbonate at 315°C and E, RADEL A-300 polyethersulfone at 380°C.

Fig. 15. Oxygen permeability versus 1/specific free volume at 25 °C (30). 1. Polybutadiene 2. polyethylene (density 0.922) 3. polycarbonate 4. polystyrene 5. styrene-acrylonitrile 6. poly(ethylene terephthalate) 7. acrylonitrile barrier polymer 8. poly(methyl methacrylate) 9. poly(vinyl chloride) 10. acrylonitrile barrier polymer 11. vinyUdene chloride copolymer 12. polymethacrylonitrile and 13. polyacrylonitrile. See Table 1 for unit conversions.

In the mid-1950s a number of new thermoplastics with some very valuable properties beeame available. High-density polyethylenes produced by the Phillips process and the Ziegler process were marketed and these were shortly followed by the discovery and rapid exploitation of polypropylene. These polyolefins soon became large tonnage thermoplastics. Somewhat more specialised materials were the acetal resins, first introduced by Du Pont, and the polycarbonates, developed simultaneously but independently in the United States and Germany. Further developments in high-impact polystyrenes led to the development of ABS polymers. 

Whilst the Vicat test usually gives the higher values the differences are quite modest with many polymers (e.g. those of types A, B and C). For example, in the case of the polycarbonate of bis-phenol A (Chapter 20) the heat distortion temperatures are 135-140°C and 140-146°C for the high and low stress levels respectively and the Vicat softening point is about 165°C. In the case of an acetal homopolymer the temperatures are 100, 170 and 185°C respectively. With nylon 66 the two ASTM heat distortion tests give values as different as 75 and 200°C. A low-density polyethylene may have a Vicat temperature of 90°C but a heat distortion temperature below normal ambient temperatures. 

Around Izod notch Low-density polyethylene Ethylene-propylene block copolymers Cellulose nitrate and propionate ABS and high-impact polystyrene Bis-phenol A polycarbonate... 

To enhance the resistance to heat softening his-phenol A is substituted by a stiffer molecule. Conventional bis-phenol A polycarbonates have lower heat distortion temperatures (deflection temperatures under load) than some of the somewhat newer aromatic thermoplastics described in the next chapter, such as the polysulphones. In 1979 a polycarbonate in which the bis-phenol A was replaced by tetramethylbis-phenol A was test marketed. This material had a Vicat softening point of 196 C, excellent resistance to hydrolysis, excellent resistance to tracking and a low density of about l.lg/cm-. Such improvements were obtained at the expense of impact strength and resistance to stress cracking. 

Polycarbonates based on tetramethylbisphenol A are thermally stable and have a high Vicat softening point of 196°C. On the other hand they have lower impact and notched impact resistance than the normal polymer. Blends with styrene-based polymers were introduced in 1980, and compared with PC/ABS blends, are claimed to have improved hydrolytic resistance, lower density and higher heat deflection temperatures. Suggested applications are as dishes for microwave ovens and car headlamp reflectors. 

Property ASTM Test Phenolics Foamedin Syntactic Place Castable Polyvinyl Chloride Rigid Closed Cell Phenylene Oxide Foamable Resin Polycarbonate Polystyrene Medium-Density Foam Polystyrene Molded Extruded Polyurethane Rigid Closed Cell... 

A rather crude, but nevertheless efficient and successful, approach is the bond fluctuation model with potentials constructed from atomistic input (Sect. 5). Despite the lattice structure, it has been demonstrated that a rather reasonable description of many static and dynamic properties of dense polymer melts (polyethylene, polycarbonate) can be obtained. If the effective potentials are known, the implementation of the simulation method is rather straightforward, and also the simulation data analysis presents no particular problems. Indeed, a wealth of results has already been obtained, as briefly reviewed in this section. However, even this conceptually rather simple approach of coarse-graining (which historically was also the first to be tried out among the methods described in this article) suffers from severe bottlenecks - the construction of the effective potential is neither unique nor easy, and still suffers from the important defect that it lacks an intermolecular part, thus allowing only simulations at a given constant density. 

Nanoelectrode ensembles were prepared by electroless deposition of Au within the pores of polycarbonate membrane filters (Poretics). Filters with pore diameters of 10 and 30 nm were used [25]. The pore densities and average center-to-center distances between pores for these membranes are shown in Table 1. Multiplying the pore density (pores cm ) by the cross-... 

The pores in a commercially available polycarbonate filtration membrane (Poretics) were used as templates to form the nanotubules (pore diameter = 50 nm pore density = 6 X 10 pores cm thickness = 6 pm). As before, the electrolessly plated Au deposits both on the pore walls and the membrane faces [71]. The gold surface layers on the membrane faces allow us to make electrical contact to the Au nanotubules within the pores. The thickness of the gold layers deposited on the pore walls can be controlled... 

---