Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Poly copolymers distribution

Figure 6.10 Scanning electron microscopy and confocal Raman images of a ternary blend— polystyrene (PS), pentafluorostyrene)-b-polystyrene (P5FS-b-PS), and polystyrene-b-poly[poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate] (PS-b-PPEGMA). Solvent casting under 70% relative humidity induces regular pores in which the copolymer distribution depends on the polarity of the component. Red color indicates the presence of PS and P5FS-b-PS, and blue color is indicative of PS-b-PPEGMA. Depth analysis of the pore composition evidenced a heterogeneous distribution of the block copolymer within the pore. Figure 6.10 Scanning electron microscopy and confocal Raman images of a ternary blend— polystyrene (PS), pentafluorostyrene)-b-polystyrene (P5FS-b-PS), and polystyrene-b-poly[poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate] (PS-b-PPEGMA). Solvent casting under 70% relative humidity induces regular pores in which the copolymer distribution depends on the polarity of the component. Red color indicates the presence of PS and P5FS-b-PS, and blue color is indicative of PS-b-PPEGMA. Depth analysis of the pore composition evidenced a heterogeneous distribution of the block copolymer within the pore.
Formaldehyde homopolymer is composed exclusively of repeating oxymethylene units and is described by the term poly oxymethylene (POM) [9002-81-7]. Commercially significant copolymers, for example [95327-43-8] have a minor fraction (typically less than 5 mol %) of alkyUdene or other units, derived from cycHc ethers or cycHc formals, distributed along the polymer chain. The occasional break in the oxymethylene sequences has significant ramifications for polymer stabilization. [Pg.56]

Membrane stmcture is a function of the materials used (polymer composition, molecular weight distribution, solvent system, etc) and the mode of preparation (solution viscosity, evaporation time, humidity, etc). Commonly used polymers include cellulose acetates, polyamides, polysulfones, dynels (vinyl chloride-acrylonitrile copolymers) and poly(vinyhdene fluoride). [Pg.294]

The maximum rates of crystallisation of the more common crystalline copolymers occur at 80—120°C. In many cases, these copolymers have broad composition distributions containing both fractions of high VDC content that crystallise rapidly and other fractions that do not crystallise at all. Poly(vinyhdene chloride) probably crystallises at a maximum rate at 140—150°C, but the process is difficult to foUow because of severe polymer degradation. The copolymers may remain amorphous for a considerable period of time if quenched to room temperature. The induction time before the onset of crystallisation depends on both the type and amount of comonomer PVDC crystallises within minutes at 25°C. [Pg.432]

Suspension Polymerization. At very low levels of stabilizer, eg, 0.1 wt %, the polymer does not form a creamy dispersion that stays indefinitely suspended in the aqueous phase but forms small beads that setde and may be easily separated by filtration (qv) (69). This suspension or pearl polymerization process has been used to prepare polymers for adhesive and coating appHcations and for conversion to poly(vinyl alcohol). Products in bead form are available from several commercial suppHers of PVAc resins. Suspension polymerizations are carried out with monomer-soluble initiators predominantly, with low levels of stabilizers. Suspension copolymerization processes for the production of vinyl acetate—ethylene bead products have been described and the properties of the copolymers determined (70). Continuous tubular polymerization of vinyl acetate in suspension (71,72) yields stable dispersions of beads with narrow particle size distributions at high yields. [Pg.465]

Growth in PVAc consumption is illustrated in Eigure 3. The emulsions continue to dominate the adhesives and paint markets. It also shows the distribution of PVAc and copolymer usage by market. The companies Hsted in Table 10 are among the principal suppHers of poly(vinyl acetate)s and vinyl acetate copolymers, but there are numerous other suppHers. Many other companies produce these polymers and consume them internally in the formulation of products. [Pg.467]

As these block copolymers were synthesized using the anionic polymerization technique, their molecular weight distributions were narrow. The microspheres with narrower size distribution are better for well-ordered self-organization. Actually, all block copolymers synthesized for these works formed poly(4-vinyl pyridine) (P4VP) spheres in the PS matrices with narrow size distributions. [Pg.602]

The poly(styrene-b-isoprene) (P(S-b-IP)) and poly(-styrene-b-2-vinyl pyridine) (P(S-b-2VP)) block copolymers with narrow molecular weight distributions for blending with the microspheres were also synthesized using the additional anionic polymerization technique. The number-average molecular weights (Mns) and PS contents are also shown in Table 1. [Pg.602]

Various substituted styrene-alkyl methacrylate block copolymers and all-acrylic block copolymers have been synthesized in a controlled fashion demonstrating predictable molecular weight and narrow molecular weight distributions. Table I depicts various poly (t-butylstyrene)-b-poly(t-butyl methacrylate) (PTBS-PTBMA) and poly(methyl methacrylate)-b-poly(t-butyl methacrylate) (PMMA-PTBMA) samples. In addition, all-acrylic block copolymers based on poly(2-ethylhexyl methacrylate)-b-poly(t-butyl methacrylate) have been recently synthesized and offer many unique possibilities due to the low glass transition temperature of PEHMA. In most cases, a range of 5-25 wt.% of alkyl methacrylate was incorporated into the block copolymer. This composition not only facilitated solubility during subsequent hydrolysis but also limited the maximum level of derived ionic functionality. [Pg.264]

A radical initiator based on the oxidation adduct of an alkyl-9-BBN (47) has been utilized to produce poly(methylmethacrylate) (48) (Fig. 31) from methylmethacrylate monomer by a living anionic polymerization route that does not require the mediation of a metal catalyst. The relatively broad molecular weight distribution (PDI = (MJM ) 2.5) compared with those in living anionic polymerization cases was attributed to the slow initiation of the polymerization.69 A similar radical polymerization route aided by 47 was utilized in the synthesis of functionalized syndiotactic polystyrene (PS) polymers by the copolymerization of styrene.70 The borane groups in the functionalized syndiotactic polystyrenes were transformed into free-radical initiators for the in situ free-radical graft polymerization to prepare s-PS-g-PMMA graft copolymers. [Pg.41]

All poly(3HB-co-3HV)s synthesized by R. europha that were characterized for sequence distribution were found to be random copolymers as indicated by 13C NMR spectrometry. However, as noted above, the fractionation of some poly(3HB-co-3HV) copolymers revealed that the sequence distributions determined by 13C NMR might not be reliable. In that study, poly(3HB) that had a chad sequence indicative of a random poly(3HB-co-3HV), as determined by 13C NMR, was fractionated into various copolymers that had significantly different compositions. [Pg.76]

Weight average molecular weights of poly(HAMCL) with saturated or unsaturated pendent groups are relatively low, compared to Mw s of poly(HASCL), and in the range of 60,000 to 360,000 g mol as depicted in Table 2 [4,30,35,36]. Also for the poly(HAMCL) copolymers, the molecular weight distributions are unimodal. Their polydispersities are in the range of 1.6-2.4, which is narrower than the polydispersity of poly(3HB-co-3HV) copolymers, and close to the theoretical value of 2.0 for synthetic polycondensates such as chemically synthesized polyesters [54]. [Pg.265]

Narrow molecular weight distribution PMMA-fc-poly(2-perfluorooclyle-thyl methacrylate) block copolymers (Scheme 2) were synthesized in THF at... [Pg.21]

Block copolymers with PS and a polymethacrylate block carrying a liquid crystalline group, PS-b-poly 6-[4-(cyanophenylazo)phenoxy]hexyl methacrylate, were successfully prepared in quantitative yields and with relatively narrow molecular weight distributions (Scheme 5) [18]. The thermotropic liquid crystalline behavior of the copolymers was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. [Pg.23]

Symmetric triblock copolymers of the ABA type, where B was PTHF and A poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline), PMeOx, were prepared by cationic polymerization with trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride as a difunctional initiator [58]. Subsequent hydrolysis of the PMeOx blocks with HC1 in a methanol/ water mixture resulted in the formation of the corresponding polyethylen-imine blocks (Scheme 20). Samples with relatively low molecular weight distributions were obtained. [Pg.37]

The direct synthesis of poly(3-sulfopropyl methacrylate)-fr-PMMA, PSP-MA-fr-PMMA (Scheme 27) without the use of protecting chemistry, by sequential monomer addition and ATRP techniques was achieved [77]. A water/DMF 40/60 mixture was used to ensure the homogeneous polymerization of both monomers. CuCl/bipy was the catalytic system used, leading to quantitative conversion and narrow molecular weight distribution. In another approach the PSPMA macroinitiator was isolated by stopping the polymerization at a conversion of 83%. Then using a 40/60 water/DMF mixture MMA was polymerized to give the desired block copolymer. In this case no residual SPMA monomer was present before the polymerization of MMA. The micellar properties of these amphiphilic copolymers were examined. [Pg.46]

GTP was employed for the synthesis of block copolymers with the first block PDMAEMA and the second PDEAEMA, poly[2-(diisopropylamino)e-thyl methacrylate], PDIPAEMA or poly[2-(N-morpholino)ethyl methacrylate], PM EM A (Scheme 33) [87]. The reactions took place under an inert atmosphere in THF at room temperature with l-methoxy-l-trimethylsiloxy-2-methyl-1-propane, MTS, as the initiator and tetra-n-butyl ammonium bibenzoate, TBABB, as the catalyst. Little or no homopolymer contamination was evidenced by SEC analysis. Copolymers in high yields with controlled molecular weights and narrow molecular weight distributions were obtained in all cases. The micellar properties of these materials were studied in aqueous solutions. [Pg.51]

A PEO macroinitiator with Si — H end groups was prepared through the condensation of monohydroxy-terminated PEO with CISiMePhH in the presence of pyridine [130]. The presence of the Si —Ph moiety prevents the hydrolysis of the Si — O — C bond, due to steric factors. This macroinitiator was subsequently used for the synthesis of poly(ferrocenyldimethylsilane), PFS, to afford PEO-fc-PFS block copolymers. The ROP of the ferrocenophane was conducted catalytically using the Pt(0) Karstedt s catalyst in toluene at 25 °C (Scheme 55). Rather broad molecular weight distributions (higher than 1.3) were obtained. [Pg.71]


See other pages where Poly copolymers distribution is mentioned: [Pg.4389]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.81]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.280 , Pg.282 , Pg.283 ]




SEARCH



Copolymer distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info