Polarization potential drop

Because of the charged nature of many Langmuir films, fairly marked effects of changing the pH of the substrate phase are often observed. An obvious case is that of the fatty-acid monolayers these will be ionized on alkaline substrates, and as a result of the repulsion between the charged polar groups, the film reverts to a gaseous or liquid expanded state at a much lower temperature than does the acid form [121]. Also, the surface potential drops since, as illustrated in Fig. XV-13, the presence of nearby counterions introduces a dipole opposite in orientation to that previously present. A similar situation is found with long-chain amines on acid substrates [122]. 

The exchange current is directiy related to the reaction rate constant, to the activities of reactants and products, and to the potential drop across the double layer. The larger the more reversible the reaction and, hence, the lower the polarization for a given net current flow. Electrode reactions having high exchange currents are favored for use in battery apphcations. 

Nonpolarizable interfaces correspond to interfaces on which a reversible reaction takes place. An Ag wire in a solution containing Ag+ions is a classic example of a nonpolarizable interface. As the metal is immersed in solution, the following phenomena occur3 (1) solvent molecules at the metal surface are reoriented and polarized (2) the electron cloud of the metal surface is redistributed (retreats or spills over) (3) Ag+ ions cross the phase boundary (the net direction depends on the solution composition). At equilibrium, an electric potential drop occurs so that the following electrochemical equilibrium is established ... 

The trends of behavior described above are found in solutions containing an excess of foreign electrolyte, which by definition is not involved in the electrode reaction. Without this excess of foreign electrolyte, additional effects arise that are most distinct in binary solutions. An appreciable diffusion potential q) arises in the diffusion layer because of the gradient of overall electrolyte concentration that is present there. Moreover, the conductivity of the solution will decrease and an additional ohmic potential drop will arise when an electrolyte ion is the reactant and the overall concentration decreases. Both of these potential differences are associated with the diffusion layer in the solution, and strictly speaking, are not a part of electrode polarization. But in polarization measurements, the potential of the electrode usually is defined relative to a point in the solution which, although not far from the electrode, is outside the diffusion layer. Hence, in addition to the true polarization AE, the overall potential drop across the diffusion layer, 9 = 9 + 9ohm is included in the measured value of polarization, AE. ... 

For measurements involving current flow, three-electrode cells (Fig. ll.lb) are more common they contain both an AE and a RE. No current flows in the circuit of the reference electrode, which therefore is not polarized. However, the OCV value that is measured includes the ohmic potential drop in the electrolyte section between the working and reference electrode. To reduce this undesired contribution from ohmic... 

In this example the current density distribution is nonuniform in the vertical, since at all heights x the sums of ohmic potential drops and polarization of the two electrodes must be identical. In the top parts of the electrodes, where the ohmic losses are minor, the current density will be highest, and it decreases toward the bottom. The current distribution will be more uniform the higher the polarization. 

In the classical version one uses a two-electrode cell with DME and a mercury AE (the pool) at the bottom of the cell (see Fig. 23.2). The latter, which has a large surface area, is practically not polarized. The current at the DME is low and causes no marked ohmic potential drop in the solution and no marked polarization of the AE. Hence, to change the DME potential, it will suffice to vary the external voltage applied to the cell. During the measurements, 7 vs. % rather than 7 vs. E curves are recorded. 

But does the catastrophe really exist in the chain approach To underline the problem we used the word seemingly with respect to the appearance of the CH anomaly. We now consider this more carefully. Notice that in the chain summation each dipole is treated as if it were inserted between the infinite plates of capacitor. No matter how many dipoles we have, they do not affect the potential drop across the gap of the MC. It can only mean that the average polarization, P, in Eqs. (20) and (22) equals zero. In its turn, P is proportional to A jA, where A and A are the areas of the plate and of the dipolar array respectively. This means that the chain approach is valid when A i/A 0. In other words, even for the infinitely large dipolar lattice, its size is infinitesimally small in comparison to A. Since in this picture P - 0, according to Eq. (24) the capacitance C Ait/d > 0 and the CH catastrophe disappears. 

This result was taken as an experimental eonfirmation of the model developed by Sehmiekler [7]. However, it appeared somehow eontradictory with other results obtained with SECM. It was also suggested that eoneentration polarization phenomena occurring at the aqueous side are negligible as the whole potential drop is presumably developed in the benzene phase. This assumption can be qualitatively verified by evaluating a simplified expression for the potential distribution based on a back-to-back diffuse double layer [40,113],... 

When the ITIES is polarized with a potential difference 0, there is a separation of electrical charge across it. According to the Gouy-Chapman theory, the charges in the aqueous and organic diffuse layers are related to the potential drops and A0 in the respective layers by the equations... 

In general a polar bond is formed when an ion is specifically adsorbed on a metal electrode this results in an uneven distribution of charges between the adsorbate and the metal and hence in the formation of a surface dipole moment. So the adsorption of an ion gives rise to a dipole potential drop across the interface in addition to that which exists at the bare metal surface. 

The cathodic and the anodic polarization potentials equal each other representing the operation potential if the iR drop in the electrolyte is negligible as shown in Fig. 10-32. 

In this equation IR is the potential drop developed when the polarizing current I overcomes the resistance R = 1/cA of the electrolyte between the test electrode and the Luggin tip or probe by means of which the reference electrode makes ionic or electrolytic contact with the test electrode. 

Concentration polarization and overpotential can both occur at the working and auxiliary electrodes. There is an ohmic potential drop between working and auxiliary electrodes. To obtain the best measurement of the working electrode potential, the reference electrode should be placed as close as possible to the working electrode (Figure 17-4). 

In most modern practical batteries, a major part of polarization loss at moderately high current densities is due to ohmic potential drop. Considerable attention is therefore given during the design of a battery to ... 

The electric field which actually affects the charge transfer kinetics is that between the electrode and the plane of closest approach of the solvated electroactive species ( outer Helmholtz plane ), as shown in Fig. 2.2. While the potential drop across this region generally corresponds to the major component of the polarization voltage, a further potential fall occurs in the diffuse double layer which extends from the outer Hemlholtz plane into the bulk of the solution. In addition, when ions are specifically absorbed at the electrode surface (Fig. 2.2c), the potential distribution in the inner part of the double layer is no longer a simple function of the polarization voltage. Under these circumstances, serious deviations from Tafel-like behaviour are common. 

---