Polarizable systems, dipoles

The molecule is often represented as a polarizable point dipole. A few attempts have been performed with finite size models, such as dielectric spheres [64], To the best of our knowledge, the first model that joined a quantum mechanical description of the molecule with a continuum description of the metal was that by Hilton and Oxtoby [72], They considered an hydrogen atom in front of a perfect conductor plate, and they calculated the static polarizability aeff to demonstrate that the effect of the image potential on aeff could not justify SERS enhancement. In recent years, PCM has been extended to systems composed of a molecule, a metal specimen and possibly a solvent or a matrix embedding the metal-molecule system in a molecularly shaped cavity [62,73-78], In particular, the molecule was treated at the Hartree-Fock, DFT or ZINDO level, while for the metal different models have been explored for SERS and luminescence calculations, metal aggregates composed of several spherical particles, characterized by the experimental frequency-dependent dielectric constant. For luminescence, the effects of the surface roughness and the nonlocal response of the metal (at the Lindhard level) for planar metal surfaces have been also explored. The calculation of static and dynamic electrostatic interactions between the molecule, the complex shaped metal body and the solvent or matrix was done by using a BEM coupled, in some versions of the model, with an IEF approach. 

One method for treating polarizability is to add point inducible dipoles on some or all atomic sites. This polarizable point dipoles (PPD) method has been applied to a wide variety of atomic and molecular systems, ranging from noble gases to water to proteins. The dipole moment, p,-, induced on a site i is... 

One important difference between the shell model and polarizable point dipole models is in the former s ability to treat so-called mechanical polarization effects. In this context, mechanical polarization refers to any polarization of the electrostatic charges or dipoles that result from causes other than the electric field of neighboring atoms. In particular, mechanical interactions such as steric overlap with nearby molecules can induce polarization in the shell model, as further described below. These mechanical polarization effects are physically realistic and are quite important in some condensed-phase systems. 

As mentioned earlier, the shell model is closely related to those based on polarizable point dipoles in the limit of vanishingly small shell displacements, they are electrostatically equivalent. Important differences appear, however, when these electrostatic models are coupled to the nonelectrostatic components of a potential function. In particular, these interactions are the nonelectrostatic repulsion and van der Waals interactions—short-range interactions that are modeled collectively with a variety of functional forms. Point dipole-and EE-based models of molecular systems often use the Lennard-Jones potential. On the other hand, shell-based models frequently use the Buckingham or Born-Mayer potentials, especially when ionic systems are being modeled. 

Karlstrom, G. and Sadlej, A. J., Basis set superposition effects on properties of interacting systems. Dipole moments and polarizabilities, Theor. Chim. Acta 61, 1-9 (1982). 

G. Karlstrom and A. J. Sadlej, Theor. Chim. Acta, 61, 1 (1982). Basis Set Superposition Effects on Properties of Interacting Systems. Dipole Moments and Polarizabilities. 

A subsequent description by Bockris and associates drew attention to further complexities as shown in Figure 15. The metal surface now is covered by combinations of oriented structured water dipoles, specifically adsorbed anions, followed by secondary water dipoles along with the hydrated cation structures. This model serves to bring attention to the dynamic situation in which changes in potential involve sequential as well as simultaneous responses of molecular and atomic systems at and near an electrode surface. Changes in potential distribution involve interactions extending from atom polarizability, through dipole orientation, to ion movements. The electrical field effects are complex in this ideal polarized electrode model. 

Within the direct reaction field (DRF) method,the classical part of the solute-sol-vent system (solvent) is treated as a distribution of the polarizable point dipoles, interacting with each other. The DRF Hamiltonian of the solute-solvent system is thus given by the following formula ... 

As shown above, there have been identified several mechanisms involved in the interactions between atoms and molecules, denominated collectively as the van der Waals forces. In atomic and completely nonpolar molecular systems (hydrocarbons, fluorocarbons, etc.) the London dispersion forces provide the major contribution to the total interaction potential. However, in many molecular systems containing atoms of very different electronegativities and polarizabilities the dipole-dipole (Keesom) and dipole-induced dipole (Debye) forces may also make significant contributions to the total interaction. 

The above calculation represents an example of the application to an atom of what is called the finite field method. In this method we solve the Schrodinger equation for the system in a given homogeneous (weak) electric field. Say, we are interested in the approximate values of Uqq/ for a molecule. First, we choose a coordinate system, fix the positions of the nuelei in space (the Born-Oppenheimer approximation) and ealeulate the number of electrons in the molecule. These are the data needed for the input into the reliable method we choose to calculate E S). Then, using eqs. (12.38) and (12.24) we calculate the permanent dipole moment, the dipole polarizability, the dipole hyperpolarizabilities, etc. by approximating E(S) by a power series of Sq A. 

The purpose of this Chapter is to describe the dielectric properties of liquid crystals, and relate them to the relevant molecular properties. In order to do this, account must be taken of the orientational order of liquid crystal molecules, their number density and any interactions between molecules which influence molecular properties. Dielectric properties measure the response of a charge-free system to an applied electric field, and are a probe of molecular polarizability and dipole moment. Interactions between dipoles are of long range, and cannot be discounted in the molecular interpretation of the dielectric properties of condensed fluids, and so the theories for these properties are more complicated than for magnetic or optical properties. The dielectric behavior of liquid crystals reflects the collective response of mesogens as well as their molecular properties, and there is a coupling between the macroscopic polarization and the molecular response through the internal electric field. Consequently, the molecular description of the dielectric properties of liquid crystals phases requires the specification of the internal electric field in anisotropic media which is difficult. 

The properties we have included are the electric mnltipole polarizabilities - a , dipole-dipole, Aa py, dipole-quadrupole and C p ys, quadrupole-quadrupole - as well as the mixed polarizabilities - G p, electric dipole-magnetic dipole, Dy p, magnetic dipole-electric quadrupole and the magnetizability (magnetic dipole-magnetic dipole polarizability) i, p. The frequency-dependent response properties labeled with a prime vanish for w = 0, and the properties specified in the second rows of the equations ( Eqs. 11.75, O 11.77,0 11.79) are zero for reference states described by real wave functions (in practice, closed-shell nondegenerate systems). 

Infrared and Raman spectroscopy each probe vibrational motion, but respond to a different manifestation of it. Infrared spectroscopy is sensitive to a change in the dipole moment as a function of the vibrational motion, whereas Raman spectroscopy probes the change in polarizability as the molecule undergoes vibrations. Resonance Raman spectroscopy also couples to excited electronic states, and can yield fiirtlier infomiation regarding the identity of the vibration. Raman and IR spectroscopy are often complementary, both in the type of systems tliat can be studied, as well as the infomiation obtained. 

Polarization is usually accounted for by computing the interaction between induced dipoles. The induced dipole is computed by multiplying the atomic polarizability by the electric field present at that nucleus. The electric field used is often only that due to the charges of the other region of the system. In a few calculations, the MM charges have been included in the orbital-based calculation itself as an interaction with point charges. 

Neither bromine nor ethylene is a polar molecule but both are polarizable and an induced dipole/mduced dipole force causes them to be mutually attracted to each other This induced dipole/mduced dipole attraction sets the stage for Br2 to act as an electrophile Electrons flow from the tt system of ethylene to Br2 causing the weak bromine-bromine bond to break By analogy to the customary mechanisms for electrophilic addition we might represent this as the formation of a carbocation m a bimolecular elementary step... 

---