Pipe flow networks

Equation (8) is of the form of the Newton-Raphson method. The A(X) matrix, however, is not necessarily the Jacobian, J(X). Just how the A(X) is set up depends on the application. Bending and Hutchison (88) developed the method for pipe flow networks. Hutchison and Shewchuk (89) applied the method to multiple distillation towers. Gorczynski and Hutchison (90) detail the method for flowsheeting systems. Quasilin (91) is a flowsheeting system based on this approach. MULTICOL (92) appears to solve interconnected columns by means of this approach as well. 

The first set of constraints represents the mass conservation law at each node of the water network. The second set describes the energy (head) losses for each pipe in the network to relate the pressure drop (head loss), due to friction, to the pipe flow rate and the diameter, roughness, material of construction, and length of the pipe. In this work, the commonly used Hazen-Williams empirical formula (Alperovits Shamir, 1977 Cunha Sousa, 1999 Coulter Morgan, 1985) is used. The third set of constraints includes bounds on variables such as minimum head or flowrate requirements. This set also includes constraints to ensure that only one diameter can be selected for each pipe (stream), a more realistic representation rather than having a split-pipe design. 

Filtrate is collected in the underdrain system, which may be as simple as a network of perforated pipes covered by graded gravel or a complex structure with slotted nozzles or conduits that will retain the finest sand media while maintaining high flow rates. This latter design allows the use of both air and liquid for the backwashing and cleaning operations. 

A direct current flows in the installations during operation of cathodic protection stations therefore, the transformer-rectifier must be switched off when pipes are out or other work on the fuel installation is carried out, and the separated areas must be bridged with large cross-section cables before the work is started in order to avoid sparking that could come from the current network. 

Safety relief systems are verified as part of PSM. This includes the PS Vs themselves and also flare system piping networks. Safety relief valves are covered in Section I—Fluid Flow. A good procedure for sizing the flare system piping is found in Section 19—Safety-Relief Manifolds. This method, first published in the Oil and Gas Journal, has been adopted by APl. I have also used... 

For a geonet LDCR system, the flow rate for the geonet is determined in the laboratory by using the ASTM D4716 test method, and the value is modified to meet site-specific situations. The geonet flow rate DR is then determined in the same way as for the granular system. No pipe network is needed. 

For liquids flowing in pipes the pressure drop is commonly taken proportional to a power of the flow rate, usually around 2. One of the simplest correlations used in water distribution network calculation is the Hazen-Williams formula,3... 

Although the evaluation of partial derivatives is not usually an insurmountable obstacle in networks involving one-phase flow in pipes, several investigators (C3, L2) have explored alternative iterative methods which do not require direct evaluation of partial derivatives. These methods are generally based on linearized approximations using secants rather than tangents. ... 

In the formulation of Bickel et al. (B7) which appears to be the most general formulation on this problem to date, both the feed and delivery conditions (temperature, pressure, flow rate, and composition) are specified. As before, the decision variables include the pipe diameters. But in addition, the number, placement, suction, and delivery pressures of compressors may also be varied within the constraints of overall pipeline lengths and network... 

In the discussion above only a single pipe section was considered. For a network, nodal continuity equations in flows and pressures are also required (Nl, W12). If a pipe section is too long to be treated as one cell, it may be divided into as many cells as necessary. Intermediate nodes are introduced between cells and the equations are augmented accordingly. 

Sample problem A is a small gravity-fed water distribution network taken from Carnahan and Wilkes (C2). The network is shown schematically in Fig. 21 with an arbitrary assignment of flow directions. The numerical data on this network including the initial guesses and the final solution are given in Tables IX and X. In addition, the following data are used in the computation p = 62.4 lbm/ft3, p = 1 cP, e = 0.01 in. for all pipes. 

Piping systems often involve interconnected segments in various combinations of series and/or parallel arrangements. The principles required to analyze such systems are the same as those have used for other systems, e.g., the conservation of mass (continuity) and energy (Bernoulli) equations. For each pipe junction or node in the network, continuity tells us that the sum of all the flow rates into the node must equal the sum of all the flow rates out of the node. Also, the total driving force (pressure drop plus gravity head loss, plus pump head) between any two nodes is related to the flow rate and friction loss by the Bernoulli equation applied between the two nodes. 

A typical procedure for determining the flow rates in each branch of a network given the pipe sizes and pressures entering and leaving the network is illustrated by the following example. 

The flows of wastewater originating from the water supply of a community and runoff from precipitation on urban surfaces are typically collected and conveyed for treatment and disposal. The system used for this purpose is called a sewer network or a collection system that consists of individual pipes (sewer lines) and a number of installations, such as inlet structures and pumps, to facilitate collection and transport. The efficient, safe and cost-effective collection and transport of wastewater and urban runoff have been identified as key criteria to be observed. In this context, the word safe means that public health, welfare and environmental protection have high priority. The demand for solutions toward more sustainable water management in the cities is a new challenge. 

---