Fitting error

Also, the result of any diffraction-based trial-and-error fitting is not necessarily unique it is always possible that there exists another untried structure that would give a better fit to experiment. Hence, a multi-teclmique approach that provides independent clues to the structure is very fniithil and common in surface science such clues include chemical composition, vibrational analysis and position restrictions implied by other structural methods. This can greatly restrict the number of trial structures which must be investigated. 

Model-fitting procedures are usually based on analytical solutions of the model however, model parameters may be estimated by fitting the differential equations describing the model. Since the numerical solution of the differential equations introduces another source of error, fitting of differential equations is usually limited to cases where nonlinearities are present. 

What viscosity model best represents the following data Determine the values of the parameters in the model. Show a plot of the data together with the line that represents the model, to show how well the model works. Hint The easiest way to do this is by trial and error, fitting the model equation to the data using a spreadsheet.)... 

We can summarise some other ideas for evaluating the predictive ability of the PLS model. First, you can compare the average error (RMSEP) with the concentration levels of the standards (in calibration) and evaluate whether you (or your client) can accept the magnitude of this error (fit-for-purpose). Then, it is interesting to calculate the so-called "ratio of prediction to deviation", which is just RPD=SD/SEP, where, SD is the standard deviation of the concentrations of the validation samples and SEP is the bias-corrected standard error of prediction (for SEP, see Section 4.6 for more details). As a rule of thumb, an RPD ratio lower than 3 suggests the model has poor predictive capabilities [54]. 

The C-0 bond lengths R(C-O) and the mean amplitudes a of the bent angle distribution were determined from trial-and-error fits of the observed MRMI maps [10], as plotted in Fig. 1.3c. The large values of R(C-O) com-... 

Tab. 11.1. Tight-binding parameters obtained from the least-square-error fit to LMTO band dispersions for the nine ll-VI semiconductors in the sp d basis with the A-B and B-B interactions. The first row lists the interatomic spacings in A, the next eight rows contain the onsite energies for all the orbitals, e.g. the row for dc t2) lists the entries for the t2cl orbital onsite energies for the cation. The subscript a denotes the anion. The last fifteen rows list the Slater Koster parameters. The last column shows the average value of the Slater Koster parameters multiplied by the square of the cation-anion distance, d. ...

Error = (Fitted value - Measured value) / (Measured value)... 

Reactions were chosen from this set by trial and error fitting to the 0.1 mM ZCo uptake isotherm. Reactions 203 and 204 (Table I) proved necessary and adequate, while 202 produced unacceptably low uptake curve slopes. The solution is not unique. Other combinations of reactions and equilibrium constants (K) can fit the 0.1 mM data equally well, but K-values significantly different from the selected range degrade the fit at higher ECo. 

Kletz s definition of human error fits well with this author s studies of accident reports. For simplicity and to have a terse definition of human error that relates directly to the occupational setting in which exposures to injuries and illnesses occur, I present this definition ... 

Differentiating the R x) profile gives the extension rate down the fiber. The practice of taking derivatives of experimental data is prone to errors. Fitting the data first with a spline function can improve accuracy of dR/dx (Secor, 1988). 

The author would like to thank Thomas Springer (Los Alamos) for many contributions to the mathematical modelling aspects mentioned here, Ruth Sherman (Los Alamos) who gathered much experimental data on RuOj, Judith Rishpon (University of Tel Aviv) who made the quartz crystal microbalance measurements of Fig. 14, and Bernard Boukamp (University of Twente) who has allowed the author to use his non-linear least-squared error fitting routines for impedance data analysis. 

---