Phases heavy atom

Number of reflections phased Heavy atom sites 11969 2 3... 

We have evaluated the electronic isotope effect for some gas phase heavy atom exchange reactions only with minimum basis set wavehmctions,... 

Referring to figure Bl.8.5 the radii of the tliree circles are the magnitudes of the observed structure amplitudes of a reflection from the native protein, and of the same reflection from two heavy-atom derivatives, dl and d2- We assume that we have been able to detemiine the heavy-atom positions in the derivatives and hl and h2 are the calculated heavy-atom contributions to the structure amplitudes of the derivatives. The centres of the derivative circles are at points - hl and - h2 in the complex plane, and the three circles intersect at one point, which is therefore the complex value of The phases for as many reflections as possible can then be... 

How do we find phase differences between diffracted spots from intensity changes following heavy-metal substitution We first use the intensity differences to deduce the positions of the heavy atoms in the crystal unit cell. Fourier summations of these intensity differences give maps of the vectors between the heavy atoms, the so-called Patterson maps (Figure 18.9). From these vector maps it is relatively easy to deduce the atomic arrangement of the heavy atoms, so long as there are not too many of them. From the positions of the heavy metals in the unit cell, one can calculate the amplitudes and phases of their contribution to the diffracted beams of the protein crystals containing heavy metals. 

X-Ray diffraction from single crystals is the most direct and powerful experimental tool available to determine molecular structures and intermolecular interactions at atomic resolution. Monochromatic CuKa radiation of wavelength (X) 1.5418 A is commonly used to collect the X-ray intensities diffracted by the electrons in the crystal. The structure amplitudes, whose squares are the intensities of the reflections, coupled with their appropriate phases, are the basic ingredients to locate atomic positions. Because phases cannot be experimentally recorded, the phase problem has to be resolved by one of the well-known techniques the heavy-atom method, the direct method, anomalous dispersion, and isomorphous replacement.1 Once approximate phases of some strong reflections are obtained, the electron-density maps computed by Fourier summation, which requires both amplitudes and phases, lead to a partial solution of the crystal structure. Phases based on this initial structure can be used to include previously omitted reflections so that in a couple of trials, the entire structure is traced at a high resolution. Difference Fourier maps at this stage are helpful to locate ions and solvent molecules. Subsequent refinement of the crystal structure by well-known least-squares methods ensures reliable atomic coordinates and thermal parameters. 

Force fields split naturally into two main classes all-atom force fields and united atom force fields. In the former, each atom in the system is represented explicitly by potential functions. In the latter, hydrogens attached to heavy atoms (such as carbon) are removed. In their place single united (or extended) atom potentials are used. In this type of force field a CH2 group would appear as a single spherical atom. United atom sites have the advantage of greatly reducing the number of interaction sites in the molecule, but in certain cases can seriously limit the accuracy of the force field. United atom force fields are most usually required for the most computationally expensive tasks, such as the simulation of bulk liquid crystal phases via molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo methods (see Sect. 5.1). 

Multiple isomorphous replacement allows the ab initio determination of the phases for a new protein structure. Diffraction data are collected for crystals soaked with different heavy atoms. The scattering from these atoms dominates the diffraction pattern, and a direct calculation of the relative position of the heavy atoms is possible by a direct method known as the Patterson synthesis. If a number of heavy atom derivatives are available, and... 

This approximation has already proven very effective in the calculation of likelihood functions for maximum likelihood refinement of parameters of the heavy-atom model, when phasing macromolecular structure factor amplitudes with the computer program SHARP [53]. A similar approach was also used in computing the variances to be used in evaluation of a %2 criterion in [54]. 

Once a suitable crystal is obtained and the X-ray diffraction data are collected, the calculation of the electron density map from the data has to overcome a hurdle inherent to X-ray analysis. The X-rays scattered by the electrons in the protein crystal are defined by their amplitudes and phases, but only the amplitude can be calculated from the intensity of the diffraction spot. Different methods have been developed in order to obtain the phase information. Two approaches, commonly applied in protein crystallography, should be mentioned here. In case the structure of a homologous protein or of a major component in a protein complex is already known, the phases can be obtained by molecular replacement. The other possibility requires further experimentation, since crystals and diffraction data of heavy atom derivatives of the native crystals are also needed. Heavy atoms may be introduced by covalent attachment to cystein residues of the protein prior to crystallization, by soaking of heavy metal salts into the crystal, or by incorporation of heavy atoms in amino acids (e.g., Se-methionine) prior to bacterial synthesis of the recombinant protein. Determination of the phases corresponding to the strongly scattering heavy atoms allows successive determination of all phases. This method is called isomorphous replacement. 

The method, also called heavy atom method, consists in introducing a heavy atom in the molecule. Then X-rays with a wave length close to the X-ray absorption of the heavy atom is introduced. As a result a phase shift is superimposed on the ordinary diffraction pattern and configuration is then deduced. The method was first employed in 1951 by Bijvoet et al. to examine sodium rubidium tartrate who concluded that it is possible to differentiate between the two optically active forms. In other words it was possible to determine the absolute configuration of the enantiomers. Since then the absolute configurations of about two hundred optically active compounds have been elucidated by their correlation with other substances of known configuration. 

If the Patterson method cannot be applied because the structure has no or too many heavy atoms, it is possible to use another approach for phase determination, the so-called direct methods. By the term direct methods is meant that class of methods which exploits relationships among the structure factors in order to go directly from the observed magnitudes E to the needed phases < ) (Herbert A. Hauptman, Nobel lecture, 9. Dec., 1985). The direct method approach for solving the phase problem uses probability... 

The isomorphous replacement method requires attachment of heavy atoms to protein molecules in the crystal. In this method, atoms of high atomic number are attached to the protein, and the coordinates of these heavy atoms in the unit cell are determined. The X-ray diffraction pattern of both the native protein and its heavy atom derivative(s) are determined. Application of the so-called Patterson function determines the heavy atom coordinates. Following the refinement of heavy atom parameters, the calculation of protein phase angles proceeds. In the final step the electron density of the protein is calculated. 

---