Tolerance percentage

This model has an absolute tolerance rather than a percentage tolerance. The parameter 1 0.05. 

Note 2—The Fahrenheit tolerance is 1.8 times larger than the °C tolerance at the equivalent °C temperature. Note particularly that percentage tolerances apply only to temperatures that are expressed in °C. 

The basic seed processing plant design is based on 70% removal of the sulfur contained in the coal used (Montana Rosebud), which satisfies NSPS requirements. Virtually complete sulfur removal appears to be feasible and can be considered as a design alternative to minimize potential corrosion problems related to sulfur in the gas. The estimated reduction in plant performance for complete removal is on the order of 1/4 percentage point. The size of the seed processing plant would have to be increased by roughly 40% but the corresponding additional cost appears tolerable. The constmction time for the 500 MW plant is estimated to be ca five years. 

By using the nearest tolerance limit, which is the tolerance limit physically closest to the distribution mean, the worst case scenario is being used ensuring that overopti-mistic values of process capability are not employed. In Figure 3, a — 1.5cr shift is shown from the target value for a Cp =1.5. Cp is a much more valuable tool than Cp because it can be applied accurately to shifted distributions. As a large percentage of distributions are shifted, Cp is limited in its usefulness. If is applied to a non-shifted Normal distribution, by the nature of its formula it reverts to Cp. 

Clearance loss. This loss is caused by flow passing between the stationary shroud and the rotor blades and is a function of the blade height and clearance. The clearance is usually fixed by tolerances and, for smaller blade heights, the loss is usually a greater percentage. This loss varies between 1 and 2%. 

Steady-state voltage regulation Acceptable transitent voltage variation Non-linearity characteristics of load current Percentage distortion in voltage Frequency tolerance Power factor of load Inmsh upon switch-on... 

Accuracy (systematic error or bias) expresses the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. Accuracy is usually expressed as the percentage recovery of added analyte. Acceptable average analyte recovery for determinative procedures is 80-110% for a tolerance of > 100 p-g kg and 60-110% is acceptable for a tolerance of < 100 p-g kg Correction factors are not allowed. Methods utilizing internal standards may have lower analyte absolute recovery values. Internal standard suitability needs to be verified by showing that the extraction efficiencies and response factors of the internal standard are similar to those of the analyte over the entire concentration range. The analyst should be aware that in residue analysis the recovery of the fortified marker residue from the control matrix might not be similar to the recovery from an incurred marker residue. 

Carbon Monoxide. Carbon monoxide, a fuel in high-temperature cells (MCFC and SOFC), is preferentially absorbed on noble metal catalysts that are used in low-temperature cells (PAFC and PEFC) in proportion to the hydrogen-to-CO partial pressure ratio. A particular level of carbon monoxide yields a stable performance loss. The coverage percentage is a function of temperature, and that is the sole difference between PEFC and PAFC. PEFC cell limits are < 50 ppm into the anode major U.S. PAFC manufacturers set tolerant limits as < 1.0% into the anode MCFC cell limits for CO and H20 shift to H2 and C02 in the cell as the H2 is consumed by the cell reaction due to a favorable temperature level and catalyst. 

Male weanling rats were fed a 5%, 20%, or 40% casein diet for 10 days and then given heptachlor intraperitoneally. The animals receiving the 5% casein diet showed a three-fold tolerance to heptachlor toxicity, but the toxicity of heptachlor epoxide was not affected (Weatherholtz et al. 1969). This was probably due to inability of weanling rats to metabolically convert heptachlor to the more toxic heptachlor epoxide. This fact is further supported by the observation that changes in protein percentage in diet did not affect the toxicity of heptachlor epoxide itself. 

---