Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pearson Distribution

Two types of curve have been fitted to the moments. The first of these is the Pearson Distribution (5), a curve which is described by the differential equation... [Pg.285]

Tsukatami, T., and Shigemitsu, K. (1980) Simplified Pearson distribution applied to an air pollutant concentration, Atmos. Environ. 14, 245-253. [Pg.1173]

Pearson Distribution. A skew statistical distribution applied to find the appropriate sample size in metal release testing. (F. Moore. Trans J. Brit Ceram. Soc. 76 (3) 52 1977 where the equation and properties of the distribution are discussed). [Pg.227]

When the estimates are well founded, the skewness may be preserved by using a distribution such as the Gompertz. The median of that curve occurs a.sy = 0.5 c, while the point of inflexion corresponds to the mode at y = c/exp (1) = 0.3679 c. The statistician Karl Pearson suggested as a simple measure of skewness... [Pg.827]

If the normal approximation to the binomial distribution is valid (that is, not more than 20% of expected cell counts are less than 5) for drug therapy and symptom of headache, then you can use the Pearson chi-square test to test for a difference in proportions. To get the Pearson chi-square / -value for the preceding 2x2 table, you run SAS code like the following ... [Pg.251]

David HA, Hartley HO, Pearson ES (1954) The distribution of the ratio, in a single normal sample of range to standard deviation. Biometrika 41 482... [Pg.124]

Phelps, D.K., G. Telek, and R.L. Lapan, Jr. 1975. Assessment of heavy metal distribution within the food web. Pages 341-348 in E.A. Pearson and E.D. Frangipane (eds.). Marine Pollution and Marine Waste Disposal. Pergamon Press, NY. [Pg.123]

Any resource important for stored-product insects may be patchy and influence insect distribution directly or in combination with other factors (e.g., food, favorable environmental conditions, structural features such as harborages or refugia). This section focuses on the patchiness of food resources used for either feeding or egg laying because it is one of the major determinates of insect distribution in food facilities. The spatial scale at which landscapes need to be defined is based on the organism being studied and the questions asked (Pearson et al., 1996 Wiens, 1989,... [Pg.250]

Priebe and coworkers [107,178] have attempted to rationalize the product distribution in terms of Pearson s theory of hard and soft acids and bases (HSAB) [179], concluding as a broad generalization that soft bases (S-, N- and C-nucleophiles) form bonds at the softer C-3 electrophilic center, whereas hard bases (O-based nucleophiles) react preferentially at the harder C-l center to give glycosides. They acknowledge that other factors may overrule this interpretation, such as when C-nucleophiles give kinetic C-l-alkylated products whose formation is not reversible. [Pg.375]

We run Monte Carlo simulations to examine the performance of the sensor selection algorithm based on the maximization of mutual information for the distributed data fusion architecture. We examine two scenarios first is the sparser one, which consists of 50 sensors which are randomly deployed in the 200 m x 200 m area. The second is a denser scenario in which 100 sensors are deployed in the same area. All data points in the graphs represent the means of ten runs. A target moves in the area according to the process model described in Section 4. We utilize the Neyman-Pearson detector [20, 30] with a = 0.05, L = 100, r) = 2, 2-dB antenna gain, -30-dB sensor transmission power and -6-dB noise power. [Pg.111]

MacFarland, A., Abramovich, D.R., Ewen, S.W. and Pearson, C.K. (1994) Stage-specific distribution of P-glycoprotein in first-trimester and full-term human placenta. The Histochemical Journal, 26, 417-423. [Pg.363]

The occupancy parameter of N is 75% that is three atoms are statistically distributed in the four positions. The real stoichiometry corresponds to Mo2N0.75 and in the unit cell there are 11 atoms instead of the ideal value of 12. The Mo position has the free parameterz for which, in this particular case the value 0.258 has been determined. The Pearson symbol is tI12 (11). [Pg.95]

In Sections 1.6.3 and 1.6.4, different possibilities were mentioned for estimating the central value and the spread, respectively, of the underlying data distribution. Also in the context of covariance and correlation, we assume an underlying distribution, but now this distribution is no longer univariate but multivariate, for instance a multivariate normal distribution. The covariance matrix X mentioned above expresses the covariance structure of the underlying—unknown—distribution. Now, we can measure n observations (objects) on all m variables, and we assume that these are random samples from the underlying population. The observations are represented as rows in the data matrix X(n x m) with n objects and m variables. The task is then to estimate the covariance matrix from the observed data X. Naturally, there exist several possibilities for estimating X (Table 2.2). The choice should depend on the distribution and quality of the data at hand. If the data follow a multivariate normal distribution, the classical covariance measure (which is the basis for the Pearson correlation) is the best choice. If the data distribution is skewed, one could either transform them to more symmetry and apply the classical methods, or alternatively... [Pg.54]

The range of rjk is — 1 to +1 a value of +1 indicates a perfect linear relationship, a value of —1 indicates a perfect inverse linear relationship absolute values of approximately <0.3 indicate a poor or no linear relationship. The Pearson correlation coefficient is best suited for normally distributed variables however, it is very sensitive to outliers. This coefficient is the most used correlation measure as usual also throughout this book the term correlation coefficient will be used for the Pearson correlation coefficient. [Pg.56]

With the development of modern computation techniques, more and more numerical simulations occur in the literature to predict the velocity profiles, pressure distribution, and the temperature distribution inside the extruder. Rotem and Shinnar [31] obtained numerical solutions for one-dimensional isothermal power law fluid flows. Griffith [25], Zamodits and Pearson [32], and Fenner [26] derived numerical solutions for two-dimensional fully developed, nonisothermal, and non-Newtonian flow in an infinitely wide rectangular screw channel. Karwe and Jaluria [33] completed a numerical solution for non-Newtonian fluids in a curved channel. The characteristic curves of the screw and residence time distributions were obtained. [Pg.257]

Curve fitting is an important tool for obtaining band shape parameters and integrated areas. Spectroscopic bands are typically modeled as Lorenzian distributions in one extreme and Gaussian distributions in the other extreme [69]. Since many observable spectroscopic features lie in between, often due to instrument induced signal convolution, distributions such as the Voight and Pearson VII have been developed [70]. Many reviews of curve fitting procedures can be found in the literature [71]. [Pg.174]

The Pearson VII model contains four adjustable parameters and is particularly well suited for the curve fitting of large spectral windows containing numerous spectral features. The adjustable parameters a, p, q and v° correspond to the amplitude, line width, shape factor and band center respectively. As q —the band reduces to a Lorenzian distribution and as q approaches ca. 50, a more-or-less Gaussian distribution is obtained. If there are b bands in a data set and... [Pg.174]

The extent to which an atom or molecule s charge distribution is affected by an external electric field E (which could be due to an approaching reactant) is governed, to first order, by its polarizability a. It was really a to which Pearson was referring in his hard and soft acid-base theory, which rationalizes a large number of chemical reactions. The terms hard and soft refer, respectively, to low and high polarizability. [Pg.8]

I Model development. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. C Food Bioproducts Process. 83, 261-272. Bouchon, P., Hollins, P., Pearson, M., Pyle, D. L., and Tobin, M. J. (2001). Oil distribution in fried potatoes monitored by infrared microspectroscopy. J. Food Sci. 66, 918-923. [Pg.231]


See other pages where Pearson Distribution is mentioned: [Pg.285]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.1799]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.172]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.285 ]




SEARCH



Pearson

© 2024 chempedia.info