Pauli, generally

W. Pauli, General Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980. 

The state F) is such that the particle states a, b, c,..., q are occupied and each particle is equally likely to be in any one of the particle states. However, if two of the particle states a, b, c,...,q are the same then F) vanishes it does not correspond to an allowed state of the assembly. This is a characteristic of antisynmietric states and it is called the Pauli exclusion principle no two identical fennions can be in the same particle state. The general fimction for an assembly of bosons is... 

The strategy for representing this differential equation geometrically is to expand both H and p in tenns of the tln-ee Pauli spin matrices, 02 and and then view the coefficients of these matrices as time-dependent vectors in three-dimensional space. We begin by writing die the two-level system Hamiltonian in the following general fomi. 

Generalized first-order kinetics have been extensively reviewed in relation to teclmical chemical applications [59] and have been discussed in the context of copolymerization [53]. From a theoretical point of view, the general class of coupled kinetic equation (A3.4.138) and equation (A3.4.139) is important, because it allows for a general closed-fomi solution (in matrix fomi) [49]. Important applications include the Pauli master equation for statistical mechanical systems (in particular gas-phase statistical mechanical kinetics) [48] and the investigation of certain simple reaction systems [49, ]. It is the basis of the many-level treatment of... 

Relativistic density functional theory can be used for all electron calculations. Relativistic DFT can be formulated using the Pauli formula or the zero-order regular approximation (ZORA). ZORA calculations include only the zero-order term in a power series expansion of the Dirac equation. ZORA is generally regarded as the superior method. The Pauli method is known to be unreliable for very heavy elements, such as actinides. 

The most general statement of the Pauli principle for electrons and other fermions is that the total wave function must be antisymmetric to electron (or fermion) exchange. For bosons it must be symmetric to exchange. 

However, Pauli s Nobel Prize-winning work did not provide a solution to the question which I shall call the closing of the periods —that is why the periods end, in the sense of achieving a full-shell configuration, at atomic numbers 2,10, 18, 36, 54, and so forth. This is a separate question from the closing of the shells. For example, if the shells were to fill sequentially, Pauli s scheme would predict that the second period should end with element number 28 or nickel, which of course it does not. Now, this feature is important in chemical education since it implies that quantum mechanics cannot strictly predict where chemical properties recur in the periodic table. It would seem that quantum mechanics does not fully explain the single most important aspect of the periodic table as far as general chemistry is concerned. 

The application of the quantum mechanics to the interaction of more complicated atoms, and to the non-polar chemical bond in general, is now being made (45). A discussion of this work can not be given here it is, however, worthy of mention that qualitative conclusions have been drawn which are completely equivalent to G. N. Lewis s theory of the shared electron pair. The further results which have so far been obtained are promising and we may look forward with some confidence to the future explanation of chemical valence in general in terms of the Pauli exclusion principle and the Heisenberg-Dirac resonance phenomenon. 

This result must now, however, be replaced by one based upon the quantum theory. In this case a generally applicable expression cannot be obtained, and it is necessary to consider particular molecular models. W. Pauli, Jr.3 has treated the diatomic dipole, which is of interest to us, and his treatment forms the basis of this discussion. 

We will soon encounter the enormous consequences of this antisymmetry principle, which represents the quantum-mechanical generalization of Pauli s exclusion principle ( no two electrons can occupy the same state ). A logical consequence of the probability interpretation of the wave function is that the integral of equation (1-7) over the full range of all variables equals one. In other words, the probability of finding the N electrons anywhere in space must be exactly unity,... 

The properties of the Slater determinant demonstrate immediately the Pauli exclusion principle, as usually taught. It reads No two electrons can have all four quantum numbers equal, that is to say that they cannot occupy the same quantum state. It is the direct result of the more general argument that the wavefunction must be antisymmetric under the permutation of any pair of (identical and indistinguishable) electrons. 

The connection between the Pauli exclusion principle and the more general Pauli principle can be understood as follows. If two electrons with the same spin a were to occupy the same orbital ip, the total wave function for the system would be written yi, zO (/ "to, yi,... 

The requirement that electrons (and fermions in general) have antisymmetric many-particle wave functions is called the Pauli principle, which can be stated as follows ... 

The Pauli exclusion principle requires that no two electrons can occupy the same spin-orbital is a consequence of the more general Pauli antisymmetry principle ... 

---