Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Probability interpretation

The gedanken" experiment in Section 3 4.4.2 results in equation 3.4.4-2 suggesting the operations of summation and multiplication in the algebraic sense - not as probabilities. Since this is a simulation why are not the results correct until given the probability interpretation Hint refer to the Venn Diagram discussion (Section 2.2)... [Pg.148]

Answer It is necessary in taking the summation that overlapping areas be removed to get the probability interpretation. [Pg.500]

A final example is the concept of QM state. It is often stated that the wave function must be square integrable because the modulus square of the wave function is a probability distribution. States in QM are rays in Hilbert space, which are equivalence classes of wave functions. The equivalence relation between two wave functions is that one wave function is equal to the other multiplied by a complex number. The space of QM states is then a projective space, which by an infinite stereographic projection is isomorphic to a sphere in Hilbert space with any radius, conventionally chosen as one. Hence states can be identified with normalized wave functions as representatives from each equivalence class. This fact is important for the probability interpretation, but it is not a consequence of the probability interpretation. [Pg.26]

III. Experimental observation of Quantum Mechanics. Only this final section should address the rules that govern interpretations of experiments measuring properties of QM systems with macroscopic devices. This includes probability interpretation, uncertainty relations, complementarity and correspondence. Then experiments can be discussed to show how the wave functions manipulated in section I can be used to predict the probabilistic outcome of experiments. [Pg.29]

We will soon encounter the enormous consequences of this antisymmetry principle, which represents the quantum-mechanical generalization of Pauli s exclusion principle ( no two electrons can occupy the same state ). A logical consequence of the probability interpretation of the wave function is that the integral of equation (1-7) over the full range of all variables equals one. In other words, the probability of finding the N electrons anywhere in space must be exactly unity,... [Pg.23]

The probability interpretation from equation (1-7) of the wave function leads directly to the central quantity of this book, the electron density p(r). It is defined as the following multiple integral over the spin coordinates of all electrons and over all but one of the spatial variables... [Pg.36]

The most probable interpretation of the above results is that the conformation disfavored by steric repulsion between the ortho- and a-substituents is the same conformation that is required for the substrate to be bound in the active site of the enzyme. Undoubtedly it is conformation A (syn-periplanarwith respect to the ortho- and a-substituents) illustrated in Fig. 9. If the substrate could undergo the reaction via the other planar conformation (B), the expected product would have been obtained, because conformation (B) is free from steric repulsion between the two substituents, and the substrate would have had no difficulty to take up this conformation. The actual inactivity of the two compounds (X, R = Cl, CH3 and CH3, CH3) suggests that, for some reason, conformation (B) is disfavored in the pocket of the enzyme. Then, how much is the energy... [Pg.23]

The probability interpretation of the wave function in quantum mechanics obtained by forming the square of its magnitude leads naturally to a simple idea for the weights of constituent parts of the wave function when it is written as a linear combination of orthonormal functions. Thus, if... [Pg.16]

As already mentioned the derivation above leaves the interpretation, classical or quantum to the eye of the beholder. The second remark concerns biorthogonality, which implies that the coefficients c, will not be associated with a probability interpretation since we have the rule c + c = 1. The operators, in Eqs. (65)-(68), are in general non-selfadjoint and nonnormal (do not commute with its own adjoint), hence the order between them must be respected. We finally note that the general kets in Eq. (68) depend on energy and momenta, whereas in the conjugate problem, to be introduced below, they rely on time and position. Introducing well-known operator identifications, (h = 2nh is Planck s constant and V the gradient operator)... [Pg.64]

Max Bom, German-British physicist. Bom in Breslau (now Wroclaw, Poland), 1882, died in Gottingen, 1970. Professor Berlin, Cambridge, Edinburgh. Nobel Prize, 1954. One of the founders of quantum mechanics, originator of the probability interpretation of the (square of the) wave-function (Chapter 4). [Pg.22]

The generally accepted notion of wave-particle duality, which predates Heisenberg and Bohr, could be reconciled with the probability interpretation, but the fuzziness associated with waves remained unexplained in the orthodox tradition. The proclamation of the quantum-mechanical uncertainty principle was intended to take care of the oversight. A more serious indictment of the orthodox tradition is hard to imagine, short of the blunt statement by Nobel physicist, Murray Gell-Mann [28] ... [Pg.92]

As an example, in liquid BeF2-LiF, one can interpret the characteristics of the NMR absorption as being due to the existence of BeF. The ion is stable to 820 K. However, no evidence of the ion s rotation is seen, and a probable interpretation of this is that BeF groups are bonded into bigger structures, which prevent rotation of individual units in the structure. [Pg.710]

Results on the adsorption of azide (N3 ) and cyanate (CNO ) ions have been reported by Corrigan et al. [113,135]. For adsorbed azide ion on a silver electrode only one potential-dependent band has been reported between 2074 and 2083 cm . As discussed by Corrigan and Weaver [135], at low potentials a loss of azide ions in solution is observed (band at 2048 cm in Fig. 44) without a corresponding adsorbate gain. As the potential is made more positive a weak adsorbate band is developed (2074 cm ). The most probable interpretation, according to Corrigan and Weaver, is that at low potentials the linear N3 ion is flat-adsorbed. As the degree of... [Pg.182]

In fact, Kelen et al. [134] have presented data and a theoretical approach indicating that the backbiting mechanism seems to be the most probable interpretation of ring-formation in the cationic polymerization of 1,3-di-oxolane. [Pg.311]

Quantum mechanics involves two distinct sets of hypotheses—the general mathematical scheme of linear operators and state vectors with its associated probability interpretation and the commutation relations and equations of motion for specific dynamical systems. It is the latter aspect that we wish to develop, by substituting a single quantum dynamical principle for the conventional array of assumptions based on classical Hamiltonian dynamics and the correspondence principle. [Pg.352]

Besides a high fraction of Te in substitutional positions a second type of Te was found in iron. The most probable interpretation was that formation of iron tel-lurides occurred. After heating to 400°C the Te atoms in substitutional positions also changed into tellurides. [Pg.62]

In cyclic voltammetry measurements of DMF solutions of nitroso-, azoxy-, and azobenzene using the hanging mercury drop electrode, it was found that besides the usual peaks of redox processes an additional, new system of peaks was observed. Its properties were nearly identical for all three substrates. The most probable interpretation seems to be to attribute this additional system of peaks to a reaction between adsorbed azobenzene dianion and mercury at graphite such additional peaks were not observed [173] ... [Pg.399]

State the conditions that a function must satisfy in order to be a solution of the Schrodinger equation. Explain how these conditions provide the probability interpretation of the wave function (Section 4.5). [Pg.162]

These areas under the normal distribution curve can be given probability interpretations. For example, if an experiment yields a nearly normal distribution... [Pg.913]

LPG-like substances, collectively termed excreted factor (EF), are present in conditioned medium from Leishmania parasites. The components of the EF can be organized into several categories. In one, LPG can form very tight complexes with albumin in the medium. Analysis of this form of LPG in the medium indicates that it is identical in all respects to the cell-associated LPG. One probable interpretation is that the lipid portion of LPG interacts with the hydrophobic binding pocket of albumin facilitating its release from the surface of the promastigote. [Pg.185]

Indeed that picture is rigorously correct. It has been shownf that the forces that the electrons in a molecule exert on the nuclei are just those that would be exerted according to classical electrostatic theory by a cloud of negative charge distributed according to the probability interpretation of the square of the wave function for the electrons. The equilibrium lengths of the bonds are determined by the point at which the attractive forces, which... [Pg.46]

Fig. 5 9 According to the probability interpretation of wave functions, the squares of the two functions shown in Fig. 5.7 measure the relative probability of finding the electron at various places, when it is in a state described by one or the other wave function... Fig. 5 9 According to the probability interpretation of wave functions, the squares of the two functions shown in Fig. 5.7 measure the relative probability of finding the electron at various places, when it is in a state described by one or the other wave function...
Beck [1928BEC] has measured the enthalpy of reaction of Th(S04)2(cr) with an aqueous NaOH solution of unstated concentration at 20°C. As noted in Appendix A, it is impossible to derive unambiguous values for the enthalpy of formation of Th(S04)2(cr) from these data but the more probable interpretation implies a value of Af//° (Th(S04)2, cr, 298.15 K) = -2502 kJ-moP, with an unknown, but large uncertainty. [Pg.276]


See other pages where Probability interpretation is mentioned: [Pg.29]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.1001]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.705]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.1000]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.100 ]




SEARCH



Data interpretation probability density function

Interpretations, assessing probability

Probability Definitions and Interpretations

Probability density function interpretation

© 2024 chempedia.info