Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particles electrostatic effects

Larsericsdotter, H., Oscarsson, S., and Buijs, J. 2001. Thermodynamic analysis of proteins adsorbed on silica particles Electrostatic effects. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 237 98-103. [Pg.977]

The electrostatic force is directly proportional to the net charge of an aerosol particle. Therefore, effective charging of the particles is of great importance. Airborne particles are normally charged either due to their birth processes or due to charge transfer from gas ions to particles. The natural charging of particles is normally so weak that it has no practical importance for electrostatic air cleaning. [Pg.1213]

According to this approximation, the drift velocity is proportional to the square of the electric field. This is a clear indication of the importance of the electric field inside an electrostatic precipitator. Equation (13.60) is a valid approximation for large particles [dp > 0.5 m), provided that particle charge is close to the saturation level. In the case of small particles, the effect of diffusion charging must be taken into account. [Pg.1226]

If only electrostatic effects are responsible for polymer adsorption and flocculation, our results can be explained according to the same scheme as that used by Furusawa et Al.(20) to interprete the destabilization of negatively charged latex by a cationic polymer. In a first step, the adsorption of the polymer leads to the neutralization of the particles which are no more stabilized by electrostatic repulsions and there is flocculation (we have not studied this step since in our experiments polymer was always in large excess with respect to Al(0H)3). In a second step the adsorption inverses the charge and (we have indeed measured by... [Pg.140]

Fitzgerald et al. (1984) measured pressure fluctuations in an atmospheric fluidized bed combustor and a quarter-scale cold model. The full set of scaling parameters was matched between the beds. The autocorrelation function of the pressure fluctuations was similar for the two beds but not within the 95% confidence levels they had anticipated. The amplitude of the autocorrelation function for the hot combustor was significantly lower than that for the cold model. Also, the experimentally determined time-scaling factor differed from the theoretical value by 24%. They suggested that the differences could be due to electrostatic effects. Particle sphericity and size distribution were not discussed failure to match these could also have influenced the hydrodynamic similarity of the two beds. Bed pressure fluctuations were measured using a single pressure point which, as discussed previously, may not accurately represent the local hydrodynamics within the bed. Similar results were... [Pg.69]

From the illustrative value given for pe above it is apparent that electrostatic effects on vapor pressure will be negligible unless the particle charge level is orders of magnitude greater than I V/micron. [Pg.8]

In general, the adsorption of a surfactant on particles with previously adsorbed polymer can be influenced by (i) a reduction of surface area available for adsorption as a result of the presence of adsorbed polymer, (ii) possible interactions between polymer and surfactant in the bulk solution or in the interfacial region (that is, surfactant with loops, tails or trains of adsorbed polymer molecules), (iii) the steric effect of adsorbed polymer, preventing approach of surfactant molecules for adsorption at the surface, or (iv) possible electrostatic effects if polymer and/or surfactant are charged species. [Pg.300]

To account for their data (Fig. 2.7), Mondain-Monval et al. hypothesized that these two forces simply add and that the repulsion between micelles and droplets increases the effective diameter of the droplets (or micelles) [22]. This force is derived by integrating the osmotic pressure Posm over the accessible zone for micelles of diameter 2r (r = 2.35 nm) from 6 = n to 9 = 7t -Oi, with 9i defined in Fig. 2.6. The distance at which the small micelles are excluded from the gap between the droplets is evidently influenced by the electrostatic micelle-droplet repulsion. To account for this repulsion, droplets (or micelles) may be considered as particles of effective radius (a + S) [or micelles of radius (r + 5)]. From... [Pg.61]

Other factors also come into play in laboratory systems. For example, McMurry and Rader (1985) have shown that particle deposition at the walls of Teflon smog chambers is controlled by Brownian and turbulent diffusion for particles with Dp 0.05 yxm and by gravitational settling for particles with Dp > 1.0 yxm. However, in the 0.05- to 1.0-yxm range, the deposition is controlled by electrostatic effects Teflon tends to... [Pg.364]

These compressed air nebulizers produce polydisperse aerosols. After the aerosol is produced, the size distribution may change due to evaporation of liquid from the droplets. In addition, the particles may be electrically charged due to an ion imbalance in the droplets as they form if such charges become further concentrated due to evaporation, the particle may break up into smaller particles. Thus electrical neutralization of the aerosol, for example, by exposure to a radioactive source, is usually necessary to prevent electrostatic effects from dominating the particle motion, coagulation, and other behavior. [Pg.633]

Once the dirty spot is removed from the substrate being laundered, it is important that it not be redeposited. Solubilization of the detached material in micelles of surfactant has been proposed as one mechanism that contributes to preventing the redeposition of foreign matter. Any process that promotes the stability of the detached dirt particles in the dispersed form will also facilitate this. We see in Chapter 11 how electrostatic effects promote colloidal stability. The adsorption of ions —especially amphipathic surfactant ions —onto the detached matter assists in blocking redeposition by stabilizing the dispersed particles. Materials such as carbox-ymethylcellulose are often added to washing preparations since these molecules also adsorb on the detached dirt particles and interfere with their redeposition. [Pg.340]

Electrostatic and electrical double-layer forces play a very important role in a number of contexts in science and engineering. As we see in Chapter 13, the stability of a wide variety of colloids, ranging from food colloids, pharmaceutical dispersions, and paints, to colloidal contaminants in wastewater, is affected by surface charges on the particles. The filtration efficiency of submicron particles can be diminished considerably by electrical double-layer forces. As we point out in Chapter 13, coagulants are added to neutralize the electrostatic effects, to promote aggregation, and to enhance the ease of separation. [Pg.499]

To apply these ideas to coagulation phenomena, we must consider what happens to these distributions of potential when two similar surfaces approach one another (Section 11.7). To study coagulation phenomena, we need to compare the electrostatic effects of particle approach with the van der Waals effects discussed in the last chapter. This is done in terms of potential energy curves as discussed in Section 10.2. As we move through the chapter, our interest shifts from potential (volts) to potential energy (joules). It is important to keep track of the difference between the two as the development progresses. [Pg.501]

Reay also considered the viscous interaction between a bubble and particle as the particle approaches the bubble. In effect, he allowed the particle to rotate as it gets close to the bubble. This model predicts, as G becomes very small, that particles will attach to bubbles as a result of hydrodynamic forces alone (for small particles and large bubbles). In effect, the vacuum induced in the wake behind a rising bubble can trap particles in spite of mtcrfacial repulsion due to electrostatic effects. This model suggests that for flotation of oily water another mechanism (hydrodynamic capture), in addition to collision, may contribute to the overall removal rate. Evidence is presented in this paper that hydrodynamic capture is an operative mechanism tor the bubble and particle sizes encountered in flotation of oil drops using bubbles from 0.2 to 0.7 mm in diameter. [Pg.214]

X. l very small particles or micelles. Electrostatic effects negligible. [Pg.23]

In the presence of increasing amounts of emulsifier, then, the mechanism of particle formation becomes increasingly determined by particle nucleation rather than coagulation. Similar electrostatic effects may be brought about by copolymerization of ionic monomers in the absence of conventional emulsifiers (38,... [Pg.30]

One of the important characteristics of gas-solid multiphase flows is concerned with the electrostatic effect. Particles can be charged by surface contact in a collision, by corona charging and scattering in an ionized gas, by thermionic emission in a high-temperature environment, and by other charging mechanisms such as colloidal propulsion... [Pg.103]

It is noted that the particle-wall interaction in the boundary layer and the electrostatic effect due to the electrostatic charge carried by the particles may strongly affect particle collection and reentrainment in the cyclone and, consequently, affect the collection efficiency. In the presence of electrostatic charges of particles and an external electric field, the collection efficiency of a tangential inlet cyclone with a steep cone is given by [Soo, 1989]... [Pg.307]

It is recognized that within the range where drag reduction occurs, the solids concentration is so dilute that the averaged distance between particles is usually 10 or more particle diameters. Therefore, under this flow condition, interparticle effects can be neglected. Consider the case of a fully developed horizontal pipe flow with negligible electrostatic effects. From Eq. (11.6), the pressure drop depends only on the wall friction, as given by... [Pg.470]


See other pages where Particles electrostatic effects is mentioned: [Pg.404]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.817]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.829]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.835]    [Pg.836]    [Pg.864]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.297]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.364 ]




SEARCH



Electrostatic effectiveness

Electrostatic effects

Electrostatic particles

Particle deposition electrostatic effects

Particle effects

© 2024 chempedia.info