P/<a calculations

Bash, P. A. Singh, U. C. Brown, F. K. Langridge, R. Kollman, P. A., Calculation of the relative change in binding free energy of a protein-inhibitor complex, Science 1987, 235, 574-576... 

An analytical procedure is often tested on materials of known composition. These materials may be pure substances, standard samples, or materials analyzed by some other more accurate method. Repeated determinations on a known material furnish data for both an estimate of the precision and a test for the presence of a constant error in the results. The standard deviation is found from Equation 12 (with the known composition replacing p). A calculated value for t (Eq. 14) in excess of the appropriate value in Table 2.27 is interpreted as evidence of the presence of a constant error at the indicated level of significance. 

Fs DFWM (jet exper.) [This workl Calculation B3LYP/6- 311+G(2d,p)a) Calculation MP2/ cc-pVTZ [Ref. 101... 

The concentration-velocity data shown below were obtained for an enzyme catalyzing a reaction S->P. (a) Calculate and... 

A portable photometer with a linear response to radiation registered 73.6 p.A with a blank solution in the light path. Replacement of the blank with an absorbing solution yielded a response of 24.9 p,A. Calculate... 

Figure 37. Variation of the dielectric constant s/s2 of a metal-insulator colloid solution as a function of the metallic phase (silver) p (a) calculation based on the Lorentz model (b) calculation based on the fractal model.

Now, also the coordinates of DGS curves are described also as group of points P (A, sJ. In both cases, the curve represents the registration level for defect evaluation, and, as far as the required evaluation result is concerned, any required value may be automatically calculated by the system and displayed digitally on the screen. Fig. 3. 

Gas A, by itself, adsorbs to a of 0.02 at P = 200 mm Hg, and gas B, by itself, adsorbs tod = 0.02 at P = 20 mm Hg Tisll K in both cases, (a) Calculate the difference between (2a and (2b> the two heats of adsorption. Explain briefly any assumptions or approximations made, ib) Calculate the value for 6 when the solid, at 77 K, is equilibrated with a mixture of A and B such that the final pressures are 200 mm Hg each, (c) Explain whether the answer in b would be raised, lowered, or affected in an unpredictable way if all of the preceding data were the same but the surface was known to be heterogeneous. The local isotherm function can still be assumed to be the Langmuir equation. 

Figure A2.5.6 shows a series of typical p, Fisothemis calculated using equation (A2.5.1). (The temperature, pressure and volume are in reduced units to be explained below.) At sufficiently high temperatures the pressure decreases monotonically with increasing volume, but below a critical temperature the isothemi shows a maximum and a minimum.

The van der Waals p., p. isothenns, calculated using equation (A2.5.3), are shown in figure A2.5.8. It is innnediately obvious that these are much more nearly antisynnnettic around the critical point than are the conespondingp, F isothenns in figure A2.5.6 (of course, this is mainly due to the finite range of p from 0 to 3). The synnnetry is not exact, however, as a carefiil examination of the figure will show. This choice of variables also satisfies the equal-area condition for coexistent phases here the horizontal tie-line makes the chemical potentials equal and the equal-area constniction makes the pressures equal. 

Note the meaning of this expression for each choice of the initial and final position a and a , calculate the classical path that takes you from x to x" m time t. Specifically, calculate tire momentum along the path and the final momentum, p", and find out how p" varies with the initial position. This would give, for a multidimensional problem, a matrix dp"-Jdx"- whose absolute detenninant needs to be inverted. 

S. Miyamoto and P. A. Kollman. Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches. Proteins, 16 226-245, 1993. 

Radmer, R.. 1., Kollman, P. A. Approximate free energy calculation methods and structiire based ligand design. J. Comp. Aid. Mol. Desgn (in press)... 

Fig. 11.6 The SC24/halide system. (Figure adapted from Lybrand T P, ] A McCammon and G Wipff 1986. Theoretical Calculation of Relative Binding Affinity in Host-Guest Systems. Proceedings of the National Al adeniy of Sciences USA 83 833-835.)...

Kollman P A 1993. Free Energy Calculations Applications to Chemical and Bicx hemica] Phenojne. Chemical Reviews 93 23 -2417. 

Bash P A, U C Singh, F K Brown, R Langridge and P A Kollman 1987. Calculation of the Relat Change in Binding Free-Energy of a Protein-Inhibitor Complex. Science 235 574-576. 

Eriksson M A L, J Pitera and P A Kollman 1999. Prediction of the Binding Free Energies of New TIBO-like HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Using a Combination of PROFEC, PB/SA, CMC/MD, and Free Energy Calculations. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 42 868-881. 

Miyamoto S and P A Kollman 1993a. Absolute and Relative Binding Tree Energy Calculations of the Interaction of Biotin and its Analogues with Streptavidin Using Molecular Dynamics/Free Energy Perturbation Approaches. Proteins Structure, Function and Genetics 16 226-245. 

Pearlman D A and P A Kollman 1989. A New Method for Carrying Out Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations - Dynamically Modified Wmdows. Journal Of Chemical Physics 90 2460-2470. 

Simmerling C, T Fox and P A Kollman 1998. Use of LocaUy Enhanced Sampling in Free Energ Calculations Testing and Application to the o —> /3 Anomerisation of Glucose. Journal of tl American Chemical Society 120 5771-5782. 

Fig. 18. Jet trajectory of a round jet in bounded cross flow where J = Pj V j p (a) flow geometry, ratio of height of tunnel to diameter of injection tube HID) = 12 and (b) flow streamlines where the data points are experimental deterrninations and the lines correspond to calculated predictions for (—)...

The final factor influencing the stabiHty of these three-phase emulsions is probably the most important one. Small changes in emulsifier concentration lead to drastic changes in the amounts of the three phases. As an example, consider the points A to C in Figure 16. At point A, with 2% emulsifier, 49% water, and 49% aqueous phase, 50% oil and 50% aqueous phase are the only phases present. At point B the emulsifier concentration has been increased to 4%. Now the oil phase constitutes 47% of the total and the aqueous phase is reduced to 29% the remaining 24% is a Hquid crystalline phase. The importance of these numbers is best perceived by a calculation of thickness of the protective layer of the emulsifier (point A) and of the Hquid crystal (point B). The added surfactant, which at 2% would add a protective film of only 0.07 p.m to emulsion droplets of 5 p.m if all of it were adsorbed, has now been transformed to 24% of a viscous phase. This phase would form a very viscous film 0.85 p.m thick. The protective coating is more than 10 times thicker than one from the surfactant alone because the thick viscous film contains only 7% emulsifier the rest is 75% water and 18% oil. At point C, the aqueous phase has now disappeared, and the entire emulsion consists of 42.3% oil and 57.5% Hquid crystalline phase. The stabilizing phase is now the principal part of the emulsion. 

---