Out-of-phase states

For a < njl, the dipole orientation is repulsive. As a result, the in-phase coupled exciton state Ba ) will be at higher energy than the out-of-phase ) state. 

Figure Al.6.8. Wavepacket interferometry. The interference contribution to the exeited-state fluoreseenee of I2 as a fiinotion of the time delay between a pair of ultrashort pulses. The interferenee eontribution is isolated by heterodyne deteetion. Note that the stnieture in the interferogram oeeurs only at multiples of 300 fs, the exeited-state vibrational period of f. it is only at these times that the wavepaeket promoted by the first pulse is baek in the Franek-Condon region. For a phase shift of 0 between the pulses the returning wavepaeket and the newly promoted wavepaeket are in phase, leading to eonstnietive interferenee (upper traee), while for a phase shift of n the two wavepaekets are out of phase, and interfere destnietively (lower traee). Reprinted from Seherer N F et 0/1991 J. Chem. Phys. 95 1487.

As already mentioned, electronically resonant, two-pulse impulsive Raman scattering (RISRS) has recently been perfonned on a number of dyes [124]. The main difference between resonant and nom-esonant ISRS is that the beats occur in the absorption of tlie probe rather than the spectral redistribution of the probe pulse energy [124]. These beats are out of phase with respect to the beats that occur in nonresonant ISRS (cosinelike rather tlian sinelike). RISRS has also been shown to have the phase of oscillation depend on the detuning from electronic resonance and it has been shown to be sensitive to the vibrational dynamics in both the ground and excited electronic states [122. 124]. 

Stabilizing resonances also occur in other systems. Some well-known ones are the allyl radical and square cyclobutadiene. It has been shown that in these cases, the ground-state wave function is constructed from the out-of-phase combination of the two components [24,30]. In Section HI, it is shown that this is also a necessary result of Pauli s principle and the permutational symmetry of the polyelectronic wave function When the number of electron pairs exchanged in a two-state system is even, the ground state is the out-of-phase combination [28]. Three electrons may be considered as two electron pairs, one of which is half-populated. When both electron pahs are fully populated, an antiaromatic system arises ("Section HI). 

This situation arises when the electronic wave function of the transition state is described by the out-of-phase combination of the two base functions. If the electronic wave function of the transition state is described by the in-phase coinbination. no curve crossing occurs. 

A more general classification considers the phase of the total electronic wave function [13]. We have treated the case of cyclic polyenes in detail [28,48,49] and showed that for Hiickel systems the ground state may be considered as the combination of two Kekule structures. If the number of electron pairs in the system is odd, the ground state is the in-phase combination, and the system is aromatic. If the number of electron pairs is even (as in cyclobutadiene, pentalene, etc.), the ground state is the out-of-phase combination, and the system is antiaromatic. These ideas are in line with previous work on specific systems [40,50]. 

The results of the derivation (which is reproduced in Appendix A) are summarized in Figure 7. This figure applies to both reactive and resonance stabilized (such as benzene) systems. The compounds A and B are the reactant and product in a pericyclic reaction, or the two equivalent Kekule structures in an aromatic system. The parameter t, is the reaction coordinate in a pericyclic reaction or the coordinate interchanging two Kekule structures in aromatic (and antiaromatic) systems. The avoided crossing model [26-28] predicts that the two eigenfunctions of the two-state system may be fomred by in-phase and out-of-phase combinations of the noninteracting basic states A) and B). State A) differs from B) by the spin-pairing scheme. 

Adopting the view that any theory of aromaticity is also a theory of pericyclic reactions [19], we are now in a position to discuss pericyclic reactions in terms of phase change. Two reaction types are distinguished those that preserve the phase of the total electi onic wave-function - these are phase preserving reactions (p-type), and those in which the phase is inverted - these are phase inverting reactions (i-type). The fomier have an aromatic transition state, and the latter an antiaromatic one. The results of [28] may be applied to these systems. In distinction with the cyclic polyenes, the two basis wave functions need not be equivalent. The wave function of the reactants R) and the products P), respectively, can be used. The electronic wave function of the transition state may be represented by a linear combination of the electronic wave functions of the reactant and the product. Of the two possible combinations, the in-phase one [Eq. (11)] is phase preserving (p-type), while the out-of-phase one [Eq. (12)], is i-type (phase inverting), compare Eqs. (6) and (7). Normalization constants are assumed in both equations ... 

We term the in-phase combination an aromatic transition state (ATS) and the out-of-phase combination an antiaromatic transition state (AATS). An ATS is obtained when an odd number of electron pairs are re-paired in the reaction, and an AATS, when an even number is re-paired. In the context of reactions, a system in which an odd number of electrons (3, 5,...) are exchanged is treated in the same way—one of the electron pairs may contain a single electron. Thus, a three-electron system reacts as a four-electron one, a five-electron system as a six-electron one, and so on. 

A simple VB approach was used in [75] to describe the five structures. Only the lowest energy spin-pairing structures I (B symmehy) of the type (12,34,5 were used (Fig. 21). We consider them as reactant-product pairs and note that the transformation of one structure (e.g., la) to another (e.g., Ib) is a thr ee-electron phase-inverting reaction, with a type-II transition state. As shown in Figure 22, a type-II structure is constructed by an out-of-phase combination of... 

Type-n structures are formally the out-of-phase transition states between two type-I structures, even if there is no measurable banier. 

The key to the correct answer is the fact that the conversion of one type-V (or VI) structures to another is a phase-inverting reaction, with a 62 species transition state. This follows from the obseiwation that the two type-V (or VI) stiucture differ by the spin pairing of four electrons. Inspection shows (Fig. 28), that the out-of-phase combination of two A[ structmes is in fact a one,... 

According to Eq. (A.4), if < 0, the ground state will be the in-phase combination, and the out-of-phase one, an excited state. On the other hand, if > 0, the ground state will be the out-of-phase combination, while the in-phase one is an excited state. This conclusion is far reaching, since it means that the electronic wave function of the ground state is nonsymmetric in this case, in contrast with common chemical intuition. We show that when an even number of electron pairs is exchanged, this is indeed the case, so that the transition state is the out-of-phase combination. 

Since Q is negative, and //ab,cl for tbe ground state must be a negative sign, it follows that the ground state for the odd parity case is the in-phase combination, while for the even parity case, the out-of-phase wave function is the ground state. 

Valence bond and molecular orbital theory both incorporate the wave description of an atom s electrons into this picture of H2 but m somewhat different ways Both assume that electron waves behave like more familiar waves such as sound and light waves One important property of waves is called interference m physics Constructive interference occurs when two waves combine so as to reinforce each other (m phase) destructive interference occurs when they oppose each other (out of phase) (Figure 2 2) Recall from Section 1 1 that electron waves m atoms are characterized by their wave function which is the same as an orbital For an electron m the most stable state of a hydrogen atom for example this state is defined by the Is wave function and is often called the Is orbital The valence bond model bases the connection between two atoms on the overlap between half filled orbifals of fhe fwo afoms The molecular orbital model assembles a sef of molecular orbifals by combining fhe afomic orbifals of all of fhe atoms m fhe molecule... 

For Pond 3513, the cycle of 2 3 8U and 239,2 °pu concentrations in water (filtered with a 0.22y membrane) is out of phase with the cycle of plutonium concentrations in Lake Michigan. In this shallow pond, the concentrations of the two actinides peak in summer and decline in winter. An explanation for this cycle of plutonium is that photosynthetic activity depletes dissolved CO2 which results in an increase in pH and this in turn shifts the oxidation state in favor of Pu(V) which is desorbed from the sediments(26). 

Theory. If two or more fluorophores with different emission lifetimes contribute to the same broad, unresolved emission spectrum, their separate emission spectra often can be resolved by the technique of phase-resolved fluorometry. In this method the excitation light is modulated sinusoidally, usually in the radio-frequency range, and the emission is analyzed with a phase sensitive detector. The emission appears as a sinusoidally modulated signal, shifted in phase from the excitation modulation and partially demodulated by an amount dependent on the lifetime of the fluorophore excited state (5, Chapter 4). The detector phase can be adjusted to be exactly out-of-phase with the emission from any one fluorophore, so that the contribution to the total spectrum from that fluorophore is suppressed. For a sample with two fluorophores, suppressing the emission from one fluorophore leaves a spectrum caused only by the other, which then can be directly recorded. With more than two flurophores the problem is more complicated but a number of techniques for deconvoluting the complex emission curve have been developed making use of several modulation frequencies and measurement phase angles (79). 

Radicals and excited states have an orbital occupied by one electron. The interaction of the singly occupied orbital with a vacant orbital (Scheme 15) and with a singly occupied orbital (Scheme 16) leads to the stabilization. The stabilized orbitals occupy one and two electrons, respectively. There are no electrons in the destabilized orbital. For the interaction with a doubly occupied orbital there are two electrons in the stabilized orbital and one electron in the destabilized orbital (Scheme 17). Although the destabilization of the out-of-phase combined orbital is greater than the stabilization of the in-phase combination, there is one more electron in the stabilized orbital. Net stabilization is then expected. 

The syn addition mode was also confirmed by ab intio calculation of the reaction between thiophene 1-oxide 99 and ethylene. They stated that the selectivity can be explained by the orbital mixing rule (Scheme 51). The ir-HOMO of the diene part of 99 is modified by an out-of-phase combination with the low lying n-orbital of... 

Fig. 1 A schematic illustration of the in-phase and out-of-phase combinations of the atomic orbitals into the bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals, respectively. The dissociation limit of a H molecule corresponds to a pure diradical with degenerate singlet and triplet states...

Orbital phase continuity in triplet state. The orbital phase properties are depicted in Fig. 5c. For the triplet, the radical orbitals, p and q, and bonding n (a) orbital are donating orbitals (labeled by D in Fig. 5c) for a-spin electrons, while the antibonding jt (a ) orbital (marked by A) is electron-accepting. It can be seen from Fig. 5c that the electron-donating (D) radical orbitals, p and q, can be in phase with the accepting (a ) orbital (A), and out of phase with the donating orbital, Jt/a (D) at the same time for the triplet state. So the orbital phase is continuous, and the triplet state of 1,3-diradical (e.g., TMM and TM) is stabilized by the effective cyclic orbital interactions [29, 31]. 

Singlet o-type diradical. Figure 8 shows the phase relationship between the electron donating and accepting orbitals in a o-type diradical (Scheme 4b). It can be seen that the cyclic -p-0j -02 -q-02-0j- orbital interaction satisfies the continuity requirements in the singlet state (Fig. 8) the neighboring orbitals in p(D)-Oj (A)-02 (A)-q(A)-02(D) are all in phase while those in the sequence p(D)-Oj(D)-02(p) are all out of phase. The phase is continuous for the cyclic interaction. 

---