Transition states phase

PHASE SPACE THEORY AND ORBITING TRANSITION STATE PHASE SPACE THEORY... 

Orbiting Transition State Phase Space Theory... 

Chesnavich and Bowers (1977a,b 1979) modified the phase space theory model by assuming (a) an orbiting transition state located at the centrifugal barrier, and (b) that orbital rotational energy at this transition state is converted into relative translational energy of the products. The Hamiltonian used for this orbiting transition state/phase... 

The orbiting transition state phase space theory (OTS/PST)... 

As LEED studies have shown, the stmcture of a chemisorbed phase can change with 6. In terms of transition state theory, we can write A = (I/tq) and a common observation is that while E may change with a phase change, AS will tend to change also, and similarly. The result, again known as a compensation effect, is that the product remains relatively constant... 

Flere, we shall concentrate on basic approaches which lie at the foundations of the most widely used models. Simplified collision theories for bimolecular reactions are frequently used for the interpretation of experimental gas-phase kinetic data. The general transition state theory of elementary reactions fomis the starting point of many more elaborate versions of quasi-equilibrium theories of chemical reaction kinetics [27, M, 37 and 38]. 

Poliak E 1987 Transition state theory for photoisomerization rates of f/ a/rs-stilbene in the gas and liquid phases J. Chem. Phys. 86 3944... 

Poliak E 1990 Variational transition state theory for activated rate processes J. Chem. Phys. 93 1116 Poliak E 1991 Variational transition state theory for reactions in condensed phases J. Phys. Chem. 95 533 Frishman A and Poliak E 1992 Canonical variational transition state theory for dissipative systems application to generalized Langevin equations J. Chem. Phys. 96 8877... 

A situation that arises from the intramolecular dynamics of A and completely distinct from apparent non-RRKM behaviour is intrinsic non-RRKM behaviour [9], By this, it is meant that A has a non-random P(t) even if the internal vibrational states of A are prepared randomly. This situation arises when transitions between individual molecular vibrational/rotational states are slower than transitions leading to products. As a result, the vibrational states do not have equal dissociation probabilities. In tenns of classical phase space dynamics, slow transitions between the states occur when the reactant phase space is metrically decomposable [13,14] on the timescale of the imimolecular reaction and there is at least one bottleneck [9] in the molecular phase space other than the one defining the transition state. An intrinsic non-RRKM molecule decays non-exponentially with a time-dependent unimolecular rate constant or exponentially with a rate constant different from that of RRKM theory. 

In deriving the RRKM rate constant in section A3.12.3.1. it is assumed that the rate at which reactant molecules cross the transition state, in the direction of products, is the same rate at which the reactants fonn products. Thus, if any of the trajectories which cross the transition state in the product direction return to the reactant phase space, i.e. recross the transition state, the actual unimolecular rate constant will be smaller than that predicted by RRKM theory. This one-way crossing of the transition state, witii no recrossmg, is a fiindamental assumption of transition state theory [21]. Because it is incorporated in RRKM theory, this theory is also known as microcanonical transition state theory. 

The bulk of the infomiation about anhannonicity has come from classical mechanical calculations. As described above, the aidiannonic RRKM rate constant for an analytic potential energy fiinction may be detemiined from either equation (A3.12.4) [13] or equation (A3.12.24) [46] by sampling a microcanonical ensemble. This rate constant and the one calculated from the hamionic frequencies for the analytic potential give the aidiannonic correctiony j ( , J) in equation (A3.12.41). The transition state s aidiannonic classical sum of states is found from the phase space integral... 

A. (The gas phase estimate is about 100 picoseconds for A at 1 atm pressure.) This suggests tliat tire great majority of fast bimolecular processes, e.g., ionic associations, acid-base reactions, metal complexations and ligand-enzyme binding reactions, as well as many slower reactions that are rate limited by a transition state barrier can be conveniently studied with fast transient metliods. 

We shall assume, for simplifying the notation, that the k values are positive. For a phase-inverting reaction, the wave function of the transition state is therefore written as... 

Figure 5. A cut across the ground state (GS) and the excited state (ES) potential surfaces of the H4 system. The parameter Qp is the phase preserving nuclear coordinate connecting the H(lll) with the transition state between H(I) and H(1I) (Fig, 4). Keeping the phase of the electronic wave function constant, this coordinate leads from the ground to the excited state. At a certain point, the two surfaces must touch. At the crossing point, the wave function is degenerate.

This situation arises when the electronic wave function of the transition state is described by the out-of-phase combination of the two base functions. If the electronic wave function of the transition state is described by the in-phase coinbination. no curve crossing occurs. 

Adopting the view that any theory of aromaticity is also a theory of pericyclic reactions [19], we are now in a position to discuss pericyclic reactions in terms of phase change. Two reaction types are distinguished those that preserve the phase of the total electi onic wave-function - these are phase preserving reactions (p-type), and those in which the phase is inverted - these are phase inverting reactions (i-type). The fomier have an aromatic transition state, and the latter an antiaromatic one. The results of [28] may be applied to these systems. In distinction with the cyclic polyenes, the two basis wave functions need not be equivalent. The wave function of the reactants R) and the products P), respectively, can be used. The electronic wave function of the transition state may be represented by a linear combination of the electronic wave functions of the reactant and the product. Of the two possible combinations, the in-phase one [Eq. (11)] is phase preserving (p-type), while the out-of-phase one [Eq. (12)], is i-type (phase inverting), compare Eqs. (6) and (7). Normalization constants are assumed in both equations ... 

Phase-preserving transition state (11) Phase-inverting transition state (12)... 

We term the in-phase combination an aromatic transition state (ATS) and the out-of-phase combination an antiaromatic transition state (AATS). An ATS is obtained when an odd number of electron pairs are re-paired in the reaction, and an AATS, when an even number is re-paired. In the context of reactions, a system in which an odd number of electrons (3, 5,...) are exchanged is treated in the same way—one of the electron pairs may contain a single electron. Thus, a three-electron system reacts as a four-electron one, a five-electron system as a six-electron one, and so on. 

B. The phase changes near the transition state lying along this coordinate. It must therefore be positive close to that locality. The electronic wave function of... 

A simple VB approach was used in [75] to describe the five structures. Only the lowest energy spin-pairing structures I (B symmehy) of the type (12,34,5 were used (Fig. 21). We consider them as reactant-product pairs and note that the transformation of one structure (e.g., la) to another (e.g., Ib) is a thr ee-electron phase-inverting reaction, with a type-II transition state. As shown in Figure 22, a type-II structure is constructed by an out-of-phase combination of... 

Type-n structures are formally the out-of-phase transition states between two type-I structures, even if there is no measurable banier. 

The key to the correct answer is the fact that the conversion of one type-V (or VI) structures to another is a phase-inverting reaction, with a 62 species transition state. This follows from the obseiwation that the two type-V (or VI) stiucture differ by the spin pairing of four electrons. Inspection shows (Fig. 28), that the out-of-phase combination of two A[ structmes is in fact a one,... 

Figure 31 shows the proposed Longuet-Higgins loop for the cyclopentadienyl cation. It uses the type-VI Ai anchors, with the type-VII B structures as transition states between them. This situation is completely analogous to that of the radical (Fig. 23). Since the loop is phase inverting, a conical intersection should be located at its center—as required by the Jahn-Teller theorem.

According to Eq. (A.4), if < 0, the ground state will be the in-phase combination, and the out-of-phase one, an excited state. On the other hand, if > 0, the ground state will be the out-of-phase combination, while the in-phase one is an excited state. This conclusion is far reaching, since it means that the electronic wave function of the ground state is nonsymmetric in this case, in contrast with common chemical intuition. We show that when an even number of electron pairs is exchanged, this is indeed the case, so that the transition state is the out-of-phase combination. 

---