Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Optical microscopy limitations

Some limitations of optical microscopy were apparent in applying [247—249] the technique to supplement kinetic investigations of the low temperature decomposition of ammonium perchlorate (AP), a particularly extensively studied solid phase rate process [59]. The porous residue is opaque. Scanning electron microscopy showed that decomposition was initiated at active sites scattered across surfaces and reaction resulted in the formation of square holes on m-faces and rhombic holes on c-faces. These sites of nucleation were identified [211] as points of intersection of line dislocations with an external boundary face and the kinetic implications of the observed mode of nucleation and growth have been discussed [211]. [Pg.26]

The radii of both orifices can be either on a micrometer or a submicrometer scale. If the device is micrometer-sized, it can be characterized by optical microscopy. The purposes of electrochemical characterization of a dual pipette are to determine the effective radii and to check that each of two barrels can be independently polarized. The radius of each orifice can be evaluated from an IT voltammogram obtained at one pipette while the second one is disconnected. After the outer surface of glass is silanized, the diffusion-limiting current to each water-filled barrel follows Eq. (1). The effective radius values calculated from that equation for both halves of the d-pipette must be close to the values found from optical microscopy. [Pg.390]

The resolution or "resolving power" of a light microscope is usually specified as the minimum distance between two lines or points in the imaged object, at which they will be perceived as separated by the observer. The Rayleigh criterion [42] is extensively used in optical microscopy for determining the resolution of light microscopes. It imposes a resolution limit. The criterion is satisfied, when the centre of the Airy disc for the first object occurs at the first minimum of the Airy disc of the second. This minimum distance r can then be calculated by Equation (3). [Pg.537]

Push-push/pull-pull chromophores 118 and 119 have exhibited material properties to show their prospect for several applications particularly in the fields of two-photon microscopy and optical power limitation <1999CC2055, 2002SM17>. [Pg.705]

For samples thicker than the depth of field, the images are blurred by out-of-focus fluorescence. Corrections using a computer are possible, but other techniques are generally preferred such as confocal microscopy and two-photon excitation microscopy. It is possible to overcome the optical diffraction limit in near-field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM). [Pg.354]

The resolution of a conventional microcope is limited by the classical phenomena of interference and diffraction. The limit is approximately X/2, X being the wavelength. This limit can be overcome by using a sub-wavelength light source and by placing the sample very close to this source (i.e. in the near field). The relevant domain is near-field optics (as opposed to far-field conventional optics), which has been applied to microscopy, spectroscopy and optical sensors. In particular, nearfield scanning optical microscopy (N SOM) has proved to be a powerful tool in physical, chemical and life sciences (Dunn, 1999). [Pg.356]

Powerful methods that have been developed more recently, and are currently used to observe surface micro topographs of crystal faces, include scanning tunnel microscopy (STM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and phase shifting microscopy (PSM). Both STM and AFM use microscopes that (i) are able to detect and measure the differences in levels of nanometer order (ii) can increase two-dimensional magnification, and (iii) will increase the detection of the horizontal limit beyond that achievable with phase contrast or differential interference contrast microscopy. The presence of two-dimensional nuclei on terraced surfaces between steps, which were not observable under optical microscopes, has been successfully detected by these methods [8], [9]. In situ observation of the movement of steps of nanometer order in height is also made possible by these techniques. However, it is possible to observe step movement in situ, and to measure the surface driving force using optical microscopy. The latter measurement is not possible by STM and AFM. [Pg.93]

It may extend the limit of optical microscopy to 1 /50 the wavelength of the light. [Pg.130]


See other pages where Optical microscopy limitations is mentioned: [Pg.2487]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.871]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.1626]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.1018]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.363 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.270 ]




SEARCH



Microscopy limitations

Optical limiting

Optical microscopy

© 2024 chempedia.info