Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Optical comparison

Bromo[2.2]metacyclophane-4-carbonitril (60, which had previously been correlated with many optically active 4-monosubstituted, 4,14-homo-, 4,12- and 4,14-heterodisubstituted [2.2]metacyclophanes) 77,78) was chosen as a nicely crystalline reference substance lo6) its chirality (i ) as determined by the Bijvoet-method 106) contrasts with the previously assigned chirality based on results of a kinetic resolution 77) (vide infra), but agrees with the assignment by the coupled oscillator method (to the bisester 57) 1071 and by optical comparison and correlation 84... [Pg.46]

In analogy to 23, the chiralities of [2.2]meta- and [10]paracyclophanecarboxylic acids were also deduced from the results of kinetic resolutions 40-77>. For the application of Horeau s method, (—)-[10]paracyclophanecarboxylic acid (14) was transformed by stereoselective hydrogenation and subsequent sodium borohydride reduction of an intermediate cyclohexanone into the (—)-cis-cyclohexanol 94 which on reaction with racemic 2-phenylbutanoic anhydride afforded a 15% excess of the Ievorotatory acid thereby proving (in agreement with the kinetic resolution of the anhydride of 14, vide supra) the chirality (5) for (—)-14 and all its derivatives 40). Optical comparison with dioxa[10]paracyclophanecarboxylic acid (16) confirmed this result63,108). [Pg.48]

Everyone involved with these various proposals realizes the urgent need for a more modern system than that currently in use. The use of the comparison microscope, and the direct optical comparison in split-field observation of each and every separate piece of evidence is a tremendously time-consuming process. It also requires the physical presence of all evidence and test specimens. The circulation of evidence specimens for comparison with evidence or tests on file in other cities is also a very costly and time-consuming process, not to mention the problems that can arise in maintaining the continuity in the chain of possession of evidence. Presently, each comparison requires a manual search through the ballistics evidence files. This requires time, personnel, and a great deal of space devoted to the storage of evidence files. [Pg.87]

The diffuse attenuation coefficient (K ) is one of several apparent optical properties (AOPs) of natural waters described by Preisendorfer [25]. Unlike inherent optical properties (lOPs) described below, AOP s depend on the quality of incident light as well as the optical qualities of the water. In spite of this apparent limitation (and in part because the differences between AOP s and lOP s were said to be small in many instances [26]), a case was argued for the standard use of to characterize natural waters for purposes of optical comparisons and bio-optical models [27,28]. Gordon [17,29] provided a practical means to adjust measurements to remove much of its dependence on the ambient light field. In particular, Gordon [17] established that, after adjustment (described below), averaged from surface to Zio% is proportional to the summed concentrations of constituent optical compounds. [Pg.65]

Optical Rotatory Dispersion and Circular Dichroism. The comparison of optical rotations, at several wavelengths, of silanes of similar environment around silicon often gives a useful indication of their relative configuration. However, optical comparison alone is not a method of unquestioned validity. [Pg.78]

Lovibond tintometer Optical comparison instrument manufactured by Tintometer Ltd., for use of Lovibond glasses. [Pg.584]

It was realized some time ago that Richards method of optical comparison could be advantageously implemented in an interactive computer graphics system [30, 31]. The computer has access to data representing the electron density map and is capable of constructing a representation of the molecular model from a library describing the amino acid residues. The electron density map and the model are displayed on a cathode ray tube in a suitable form giving the illusion of three dimensions, and the operator instructs the computer to modify the model. The operator s commands tend to improve the perceived fit between map and model one of the functions of the computer is to maintain the model s bonded geometry. [Pg.461]

The evidence on which the absolute configuration of a given lignan is assigned frequently consists of a combination of chemical interconversions within and between classes of compound and optical comparisons. The four main classes of lignan are ... [Pg.186]

Chemical properties of deposited monolayers have been studied in various ways. The degree of ionization of a substituted coumarin film deposited on quartz was determined as a function of the pH of a solution in contact with the film, from which comparison with Gouy-Chapman theory (see Section V-2) could be made [151]. Several studies have been made of the UV-induced polymerization of monolayers (as well as of multilayers) of diacetylene amphiphiles (see Refs. 168, 169). Excitation energy transfer has been observed in a mixed monolayer of donor and acceptor molecules in stearic acid [170]. Electrical properties have been of interest, particularly the possibility that a suitably asymmetric film might be a unidirectional conductor, that is, a rectifier (see Refs. 171, 172). Optical properties of interest include the ability to make planar optical waveguides of thick LB films [173, 174]. [Pg.560]

Elliott C M, Derr D L, Matyushov D V and Newton M D 1998 Direct experimental comparison of the theories of thermal and optical electron-transfer studies of a mixed-valence dinuclear iron polypyridyl complex J. Am. Chem. [Pg.2995]

For either the in-line or hybrid analyzers, the ions injected into the TOF section must all begin their flight down the TOF tube at the same instant if arrival times of ions at a detector are to be used to measure m/z values (see Chapter 26, TOF Ion Optics ). For the hybrid TOF instruments, the ion detector is usually a microchannel plate ion counter (see Chapter 30, Comparison of Multipoint Collectors (Detectors) of Ions Arrays and MicroChannel Plates ). [Pg.153]

Fig. 5. Effect of polymer dosage on different observed properties of flocculated slurry (40). Comparison of five parameters in a flocculation system (8%fluorite suspension + polyacrylamide Cyanamer P250). A, Rate of settling of floe boundary, in cm/s B, height of settled bed, cm C, height of consoHdated filter-cake, cm D, refiltration rate, arbitrary units and E, clarification, % optical transmission of 1 cm of supernatant Hquid after 3 min settling... Fig. 5. Effect of polymer dosage on different observed properties of flocculated slurry (40). Comparison of five parameters in a flocculation system (8%fluorite suspension + polyacrylamide Cyanamer P250). A, Rate of settling of floe boundary, in cm/s B, height of settled bed, cm C, height of consoHdated filter-cake, cm D, refiltration rate, arbitrary units and E, clarification, % optical transmission of 1 cm of supernatant Hquid after 3 min settling...
Fig. 26. Qualitative compatison of substrate materials for optical disks (187) An = birefringence IS = impact strength BM = bending modulus HDT = heat distortion temperature Met = metallizability WA = water absorption Proc = processibility. The materials are bisphenol A—polycarbonate (BPA-PC), copolymer (20 80) of BPA-PC and trimethylcyclohexane—polycarbonate (TMC-PC), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), uv-curable cross-linked polymer (uv-DM), cycHc polyolefins (CPO), and, for comparison, glass. Fig. 26. Qualitative compatison of substrate materials for optical disks (187) An = birefringence IS = impact strength BM = bending modulus HDT = heat distortion temperature Met = metallizability WA = water absorption Proc = processibility. The materials are bisphenol A—polycarbonate (BPA-PC), copolymer (20 80) of BPA-PC and trimethylcyclohexane—polycarbonate (TMC-PC), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), uv-curable cross-linked polymer (uv-DM), cycHc polyolefins (CPO), and, for comparison, glass.

See other pages where Optical comparison is mentioned: [Pg.142]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.952]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.952]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.1023]    [Pg.1235]    [Pg.1307]    [Pg.1317]    [Pg.1325]    [Pg.1655]    [Pg.2208]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.135]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.112 ]




SEARCH



Atomic optical spectrometry techniques, comparison

Comparison between ionization potential and optical absorption of atoms

Comparison of Optical and Acoustic Reflectometry

Nonlinear optics comparison between results

Scanning optics comparison with other

© 2024 chempedia.info