Open market relationships

Open market relationships are typified by short-term contracts, arm s length relations, little joint development, and many suppliers per part. Observing that Japanese practice - and consequently the lean model of supply - differs significantly from this indicates that other, non-market mechanisms must be operating. 

The pathways from local markets are much richer. The map shows that complete pathways run from open markets and the farmer to the terminal value. Good relations, via three functional consequences of these choices of outlet. Social contact. Contact with producers, and Advice or service. Contact with producers is a central node where complete pathways for shopping at open markets and direct from the farmer intersect. Thus Contact with producers can be seen to be integral to short organic supply chains (direct and local markets). But, whereas buying from the farmer connects to value only through Contact with producers, shopping in the open market connects to value via Relationship with staff - Advice, and an abstract attribute, Pleasant atmosphere that is linked to both Contact with producers and Social contact. Thus, three main paths can be... 

Implementing partnerships the potential pitfalls in moving from open market negotiations to collaborative relationships. 

In earlier chapters, we referred to partners as other firms that happen to share the supply network with a focal firm. And in section 9.2 we started to develop the term partnership to address the evolution of additional features from a basic, arm s length relationship. Here, we use the term strategic partner to refer to a supply partner with whom a focal firm has decided to develop a long-term, collaborative relationship. Collaboration may be the ultimate objective of a number of phases through which a supply relationship may evolve. A transition route from open market negotiation to collaboration is shown in Figure 9.8. 

External affairs and investor relations should have a small group of experts at the corporate center, and the SBU external affairs personnel should have dotted line relationships with it. The corporate unit should focus on corporate identity to create a consistent and positive public image of the corporation. It should use issue management to shape public opinion, to pre-empt crises, and to cultivate a strong image and reputation for the company, and it needs to deal openly and honestly with crises when they occur. All external inquiries should be handled by the central unit - with the exception of public relations initiatives directly related to marketing efforts in the divisions (e.g., the launch of a new product). 

To mention some, in 1972, negotiations to supply mechanization facilities for zinc smelting and refining to foreign smelters started and contracts were signed successively. This opened the door for MESCO to export mechanization facilities, and thereafter, it has been successful in overseas marketing. Further, MESCO has established a relationship with Outokumpu of Finland for copper smelter facilities. In Japan, MESCO has delivered facilities not only to MMS but also to other companies which are in the same trade. 

Over time, the supplier development program transitions to focus on total cost and the building of value. This includes the design of programs to work with suppliers to accelerate open innovation, reach CSR goals, and build strategic relationships to nse assets and key relationships to penetrate new markets. It takes different forms in different supply chains. 

ME is consistent with the slow convergence of transportation and other energy systems. The studies into ME considered household market segments, and found that only about 4 million out of 34 million California residents would most likely be able to adopt ME-enabled FCVs. There does appear to be a trade-off relationship between ME-power and driving range, as well as similar give-and-take situations within the supply framework. However, as questions arise over BEVs, market forces may well be opening the door for ME innovation in the FCV sector (Williams and Kurani, 2006,2007). 

Discussion of the community s relationships with the economic markets, environmental vulnerabilities and strengths. The community s history and socio-cultural issues might be tilso open here for discussion. If there are important laws applicable to engineers, they should be discussed too. 

---