Numerical methods nodes

To utilize the numerical method, Eq. (3-24) must be written for each node within the material and the resultant system of equations solved for the temperatures at the various nodes. A very simple example is shown in Fig. 3-6, and the four equations for nodes 1, 2, 3, and 4 would be... 

From the foregoing discussion we have seen that the numerical method is simply a means of approximating a continuous temperature distribution with the finite nodal elements. The more nodes taken, the closer the approximation but, of course, more equations mean more cumbersome solutions. Fortunately, computers and even programmable calculators have the capability to obtain these solutions very quickly. 

A tube has diameters of 4 mm and S mm and a thermal conductivity 20 W/m2 °C. Heat is generated uniformly in the tube at a rate of 500 MW/m3 and the outside surface temperature is maintained at 100°C. The inside surface may be assumed to be insulated. Divide the tube wall into four nodes and calculate the temperature at each using the numerical method. Check with an analytical solution. 

The results of this example illustrate the power of the numerical method in solving problems which could not be solved in any other way. Furthermore, only a modest number of nodes, and thus modest computation facilities, may be required to obtain a sufficiently accurate solution. For example, the accuracy with which h will be known is typically 10 to 15 percent. This would overshadow any inaccuracies introduced by using relatively large nodes, as was done here. 

Substituting the given quantities, the temperature of the exposed surface of the plate at x = L = 0.04 m Is determined to be 136.0°C, which is almost identical to the result obtained here v/ith the approximate finite difference method (Fig. 5-19). Therefore, highly accurate results can be obtained with numerical methods by using a limited number of nodes. 

TheWiscretization error involved in numerical methods is due to replacing the derivatives by differences in each step, or the actual temperature distribution between two adjacent nodes by a straight line segment. 

When deriving these expressions, it was assumed that velocity at all the cell faces is positive. In other cases, suitable modifications to include appropriate upstream nodes (in place of 0ww and 0ss) should be made. It can be seen that the continuity equation indicates that the last term inside the bracket of Eq. (6.19) will always be zero for constant density flows. The behavior of numerical methods depends on the source term linearization employed and interpolation practices. Before these practices are discussed, a brief discussion of the desired characteristics of discretization methods will be useful. The most important properties of the discretization method are ... 

Several numerical methods, such as finite volume, finite difference, finite element, spectral methods, etc., are widely used for solving the complex set of partial differential equations. The latest computer technology allows us to obtain solutions with a mesh resolution on the order of millions of nodes. More-detailed discussion on numerical methodology is provided later. 

Solve this linear problem using numerical method of lines for Pe = 1, 10. How many node points are needed for obtaining three digits accuracy if average concentration at t = 1 is used to verify convergence ... 

Currently, numerical methods are most used to solve heat transmission problems. The method of Finite Differences is being substituted by the Finite Element Method. Most Finite Element based mechanical calculation codes include the Thermal Analysis. The temperature distribution obtained from the thermal calculation is used as a load input to the mechanical stress and deformation problem. For that, the temperatures at the nodes are transformed into initial strain by means of the equation... 

As was written in the foregoing, the major problems in electrochemical digital simulation in one dimension have now been solved. The new frontier is in two-and more-dimensional systems. During the last 20 years or so, ultramicroelectrodes have more or less replaced the mercury drop, and these form a two-dimensional diffusion space, whether they be single disks, or disk arrays, or (arrays of) strips or generator-collector strips, and so forth. Here, the problems include the fact of the large numbers of nodes required for reasonably accurate computations, and thus, long computation times and extreme computer memory needs, at the least as well as the fact that discretization usually produces (widely) banded systems of equations, so that sophisticated methods of solution need to be used in order to have sufficient memory and realistic computation times. There is also a lack of theoretical work on the numerical methods used. It is by no means certain that the familiar stability criteria will apply with these systems, which often have... 

To use the numerical method, Eq. (4.15-9) is written for each node or point. Hence, for N unknown nodes, N linear algebraic equations must be written and he system of equations solved for the various node temperatures. For a hand calculation using a modest number of nodes, the iteration method can be used to solve the system of equations. 

Numerical calculation methods for unsteady-state heat conduction are similar to numerical methods for steady state discussed in Section 4.15. The solid is subdivided into sections or slabs of equal length and a fictitious node is placed at the center of each section. Then a heat balance is made for each node. This method differs from the steady-state method in that we have heat accumulation in a node for unsteady-state conduction. 

Derivation of method for steady state. In Fig. 6.6-1 a two-dimensional solid shown with unit thickness is divided into Squares. The numerical methods for steady-state molecular diffusion are very similar to those for steady-state heat conduction discussed in Section 4.15. Hence, only a brief summary will be given here. The solid inside of a square is imagined to be concentrated at the center of the square at c and is called a node, which is connected to the adjacent nodes by connecting rods through which the mass diffuses. 

It would be desirable to have numerical methods for which the error in the approximate solution tends to zero independently of the parameter e as the number of grid nodes increases (i.e., at For this... 

Wang and Sun (2001) developed another numerical method to simulate textile processes and to determine the micro-geometry of textile fabrics. They called it a digital-element model. It models yams by pin-connected digital-rod-element chains. As the element length approaches zero, the chain becomes fully flexible, imitating the physical behavior of the yams. The interactions of adjacent yarns are modeled by contact elements. If the distance between two nodes on different yarns approaches the yam diameter, contact occurs between them. The yarn microstructure inside the fabric is determined by process mechanics, such as yarn tension and interyam friction and compression. The textile process is modeled as a nonlinear solid mechanics problem with boundary displacement (or motion) conditions. This numerical approach was identified as digital-element simulation rather than as finite element simulation because of a special yam discretization process. With the conventional finite element method, the element preserves... 

In the FEM, the solution domain is broken down into a finite number of smaller regions called elements. These elements are connected at specific points called nodes. An important criterion of the FEM is that the solution must be continuous along conunon boxmdaries of adjacent elements. For thermal analysis, the governing heat equations are solved using standard numerical methods. For structural analysis, stress/stiain equations are solved. 

The integral equation for the elastic boundary tractions and displacements is solved by numerical methods. The boundary is divided Into N finite length elements. In this paper the surface tractions and displacements are assumed to change linearly over each of the boundary elements. Figure 2 shows a typical boundary the surface tractions are prescribed on part of the boundary and the displacements are prescribed on the remaining part of the boundary. At each node point on the boundary there are two components of traction and two components of displacement. Thus, for N elements and N nodes there are 2N unknowns in the discretized system. The boundary Integral equation for the elasticity problem Is rewritten as below ... 

Equation (6.196) forms the basis of a numerical method if we parameterize a trial form for w f) by some vector e of coefficients cpp. In FEM, these coefficients are the field values at each node p. We then choose N weight functions Wp r) to generate a set of algebraic equations... 

Due to obvious deficiencies in the calculations with previous APROS versions a new solution model for the thermal stratification of APROS code was developed [23]. The old method used upwind solution for the enthalpy. Due to numeric diflfiision the code lost information about the stratified layer. The new higher order numeric method uses information from three consecutive nodes to solve the transported liquid enthalpy. The new enthalpy solution contains a special weight function, which is calculated from liquid enthalpies of the three nodes. The experiments GDE-41 and GDE-43 were recalculated with the new model (Fig. 4). The model was also tested separately with a standalone PSIS [24]. The calculation results were good. The new model eliminated significantly the numerical diliusion and restricted the spreading of the thermal front. 

---