Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nuclear plants radiation units

If possible comparisons are focused on energy systems, nuclear power safety is also estimated to be superior to all electricity generation methods except for natural gas (30). Figure 3 is a plot of that comparison in terms of estimated total deaths to workers and the pubHc and includes deaths associated with secondary processes in the entire fuel cycle. The poorer safety record of the alternatives to nuclear power can be attributed to fataUties in transportation, where comparatively enormous amounts of fossil fuel transport are involved. Continuous or daily refueling of fossil fuel plants is required as compared to refueling a nuclear plant from a few tmckloads only once over a period of one to two years. This disadvantage appHes to solar and wind as well because of the necessary assumption that their backup power in periods of no or Httie wind or sun is from fossil-fuel generation. Now death or serious injury has resulted from radiation exposure from commercial nuclear power plants in the United States (31). [Pg.238]

Show the complex iterations between government laws and regulations and the PSA response to not only comply but to protect the process industry. The real impact of the accident at the Three-Mile Island nuclear plant was not radiation, which was within regulations but financial losses to the utility and the acceptance of nuclear electrical f>ower in the United States. The effects of the Bhopal accident were in human life but it also had a profound effect on the chemical industry financially, and its acceptability and growth. Present the mathematics used in PSA in one chapter to be skipped, studied, or relerred to according to the readers needs. [Pg.541]

Our exposure to man-made radioactive sources, such as from nuclear power plants, is negligible when compared to the total radiation we receive. Man-made radiation accounts for less than 3% of the total radiation we receive in the United States, but in some countries, this figure is higher. The vast majority of the 3% of man-made doses of radiation we receive in our lifetime results from medical uses, and the vast majority of the 97% of the total exposure to all radiation we receive comes from natural sources. [Pg.33]

Although this has been shown to occur in experimental animals after exposure of males to foreign compounds such as cyclophosphamide, there is only inconclusive evidence that this occurs in humans. Thus, studies of exposure of human males to vinyl chloride, dibromo-chloropropane, and anesthetic gases, for example, have revealed only equivocal evidence of developmental toxicity in the offspring. There now seems to be some evidence that the leukemia occurring in children, which appears to be clustered around nuclear fuel-reprocessing plants such as Sellafield in the United Kingdom, may be due to paternal exposure to radiation. [Pg.247]

Other people arc concerned about the dangers of nuclear power. The radiation released and radioactive wastes produced by nuclear power plants have made them unpopular in the United States. It is not clear what the future of nuclear power plants in the United States will be. [Pg.647]

There now seems to be some evidence that the leukaemia occurring in children, which appears to be clustered around nuclear fuel reprocessing plants such as Sellafield in the United Kingdom, may be due to paternal exposure to radiation. [Pg.435]

Table 19.5 shows the physical effects of short-term exposure to various doses of radiation, and Table 19.6 gives the sources and amounts of the radiation to which a typical person in the United States is exposed each year. Note that natural sources contribute about twice as much as human activities do to the total exposure. However, although the nuclear industry contributes only a small percentage of the total exposure, controversy surrounds nuclear power plants because of their potential for creating radiation hazards. These hazards arise mainly from two sources accidents allowing the release of radioactive materials, and improper disposal of the radioactive products in spent fuel elements. [Pg.690]

Since the middle 1950s, both national and international procedures have imposed strict control upon the nuclear industry in the United Kingdom, to ensure that the dangers from ionising radiation to both the general public and workers in nuclear power plants are at the lowest reasonably achievable levels (ALARA— As Low As Reasonably Achievable ). [Pg.61]

Although nuclear power reactors really do have a good safety record, the distrust and fear associated with radiation make most people sensitive to safety issues and accidents. The most serious accident to occur in the United States happened in 1979 at the Three Mile Island Plant in Pennsylvania. A combination of operator error and equipment failure caused a loss of reactor core coolant. The loss of coolant led to a partial meltdown and the release of a small amount of radioactive gas. There was no loss of life or injury to plant personnel or the general population. [Pg.78]


See other pages where Nuclear plants radiation units is mentioned: [Pg.23]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.854]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.1650]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.1696]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.1006]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.2575]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.898]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.880]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.1007]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.2906]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.23 ]




SEARCH



Nuclear plants

Nuclear radiation

Radiation units

© 2024 chempedia.info