Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Normalizing constant, proof

The normalization constant />, can be evaluated and is given in Appendix II with the proof of the orthogonalities among eigenvectors. One obtains the following form for after some simplifications ... [Pg.14]

The recursion formula, the normalizing constant, and the proof for the orthogonality relation among eigenvectors are given in Appendix IV. And pi r) is given such that... [Pg.26]

The component of the eigenvector can be obtained by the same argument as in the previous cases i. e., the wth component of the eigenvector is proportional to, S , and is uniquely determined by the orthogonalization constant. Only the results will be given below the proof of the recursion formulas, the orthogonality relations, and the normalization constants are obtained by methods analogous to those in Appendix IV ... [Pg.27]

Obviously, these structural changes make the transfer of force-constants from the neutral B3 molecule to the B3+ radical inadequate. Instead, we tentatively transferred the scale factors optimized for the neutral molecule to the quantum-mechanical force-field of B3+ and calculated the corresponding scaled normal frequencies. We obtained a clear correspondence between many of the frequencies experimentally observed in Cl doped B3 crystals (Fig. 3(a)) and the calculated scaled frequencies (Fig. 3(b)). We also observed that some of the calculated scaled frequencies in the neutral B3 molecule are present in the spectra of the Cl doped crystals (Fig. 3(c)). This fact tells us that there is some portion of unoxidized B3 molecules in the sample and gives additional proof for the validity of the SQMF calculations performed on the neutral B3 molecule. [Pg.348]

The factor a is a measure of the accessibility of the bonds (13), and k is the specific rate constant for the rate of breaking of normal IC-O-4 C bonds in the anhydroglucose chain (k in Equations 1-3 equals ak). The expression 100[1 /(DPn)t — 1/(DP )0] gives the percentage of the initial number of bonds that have been broken. Equation 4 is also the equation that would apply if an equal number of bonds were broken in equal periods of time, that is, at a constant rate of chain scissioning (zero-order kinetics). Conformance to Equation 4, therefore, cannot be taken as proof of first-order kinetic behavior (12). [Pg.327]

The single most important NMR spectroscopic parameter is the scalar coupling constant, for the HD isotopomer of an H2 complex without the superscript is normally used here to refer to the one-bond coupling). The signal becomes a 1 1 1 triplet (D has spin 1) with much narrower linewidth and is direct proof of the existence of an H2 ligand, since classical hydrides do not show significant Jhd because no residual H-D bond is present. J d for HD gas is 43 Hz, the maximum possible value is 0.74 A). A lower value represents a proportionately shorter dup. 7hp determined in solution correlates well with hh in the solid state via the empirical relationships developed by both Morris [40] and Heine-key [41] ... [Pg.619]

Anemia has frequently, but not consistently, been reported in association with scurvy in clinical cases, both in adults and infants, and in experimental scurvy in guinea pigs and monkeys. The extensive literature has been cited (M18, L19, V2). The anemias were not constant in type or severity, although all were reheved when ascorbic acid was reintroduced to tbe diet. In contrast, no anemia or abnormality of the blood picture was ever seen in experimental human scurvy. The therapeutic effect of ascorbic acid on the anemia cannot be accepted as proof of its etiology, since associated deficiencies would also be made good with the return of normal appetite. It is well recognized that the clinical cases of scurvy usually have associated deficiencies. Often, there is iron deficiency in the milk-fed infants, and folic acid or vitamin B12 deficiency in the malnourished adult. ... [Pg.183]

The water in coal is bound in different forms to its constituents. It can be divided into three types (1) Free moisture, also referred to as external moisture, superficial moisture, or the primary moisture fraction, which is present in large cracks and capillaries. Water bound in this way retains its normal physical properties. (2) Inherent moisture, also referred to as internal moisture or the secondary moisture fraction, whose vapor pressure is lower, since it is absorbed within the pore structure of the coal. (3) Water of constitution, which is mainly combined with mineral matter normally present in coal. This water is generally driven off only at temperatures higher than those normally used for the determination of moisture content. Standard methods do not make use of these terms and define (1) the total moisture content of a coal and (2) the moisture content of the coal analysis sample. Total moisture determination must be made over the sample as received in the laboratory, in an air-proof recipient. The determination consists in drying in an oven at 105 °C till constant weight. Its value is of huge interest both in international and domestic coal trade (ISO 589, ASTM D3173). [Pg.761]

As it has turned out that consistency in the mean does not hold in general, several people have presented a proof of the fact that the stochastic model of a certain simple special reaction tends to the corresponding deterministic model in the thermodynamic limit. This expression means that the number of particles and the volume of the vessel tend to infinity at the same time and in such a way that the concentration of the individual components (i.e. the ratio of the number and volume) tends to a constant and the two models will be close to each other. In addition to this the fluctuation around the deterministic value is normally distributed as has been shown in a special case by Delbriick (later head of the famous phage group) almost fifty years ago (Delbriick, 1940). To put it into present-day mathematical terms the law of the large numbers, the central limit theorem, and the invariance principle all hold. These statements have been proved for a large class of reactions for those with conservative, reversible mechanisms. Kurtz used the combinatorial model, and the same model was used by L. Arnold (Arnold, 1980) when he generalised the results for the cell model of reactions with diffusion. [Pg.160]

As a proof-of-concept, the Lavigne group has investigated the sensor response for simple a,co-diamines with a chain lengths between two and six methylene groups. In addition, histamine was used as an analyte. The analysis was performed with the UV-Vis data obtained for a constant polymer concentration of 0.4mM, and for five different analyte concentrations between 0.5 and 5.0mM. The normalized absorption values at nine wavelengths were subjected to a LDA (see Glossary in Box 7.1). A jack-knifed classification matrix showed that the analyte can be identified with an accuracy of over 99% [23]. [Pg.180]

Since the scalar product vanishes, the two normals are perpendicular if the normals are perpendicular, then so must be their respective level surfaces. It is important to emphasize that we have obtained this result using Equation 4-1, which is valid only for constant density liquids in isotropic, homogeneous media. In this limit, the commonly used approximation that flow from (or into) a constant pressure fracture is locally perpendicular is, in fact, exact. The flow from a producing fracture with variable lengthwise pressure, as seen from this proof, will not be orthogonal locally (this is clear because flow parallel to the fracture exists). These results do not apply to transient compressible liquids,... [Pg.54]

As proof of curve shape similarity, the curves are normalized and shown plotted on probability graph paper. The fact that the lines for drain and pool temperatures are straight and nearly parallel, for about the same portions of volume, indicates curve shape similarity. The separation of the curves on the probability plot indicates that their equations have different constants. The difference is due to mixing, ambient heating during drain, and heat transfer to the pool from the pressurizing gas. [Pg.464]


See other pages where Normalizing constant, proof is mentioned: [Pg.60]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.922]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.922]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.55 , Pg.58 , Pg.59 ]




SEARCH



Normalization constants

Normalizing constant

Proofing

© 2024 chempedia.info