Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Simple nonpolar polymers

Polymers have much smaller effective dipole moments in the solid phase than in dilute solutions. The dipole moments of polar and nonpolar solid polymers thus differ much less from each other than the dipole moments of polar and nonpolar polymers in dilute solution or of liquids of polar and nonpolar simple molecules. [Pg.49]

Even simple polymers like polyethylene or polypropylene can form composites with carbon nanotubes. The embedding, however, is limited to noncovalent interaction due to the complete lack of functional groups. Yet on the other hand, the hydrophobic nanotube surface hardly poses any problems in a wetting by the nonpolar polymer chains or in the formation of noncovalently bound composites. [Pg.254]

However, for many simple calculations, it is valuable to have a single number parameter. Typical values of Xi are illustrated in Thble 3.4, where values were selected at low concentrations of polymer. If the value of Xi is below 0.5, the polymer should be soluble if amorphous and linear. When Xi equals 0.5, as in the case of the polystyrene-cyclohexane system at 34°C in Table 3.4, then the Flory 0 conditions exist see Section 4.1. If the polymer is crystalline, as in the case of polyethylene, it must be heated to near its melting temperature, so that the total free energy of melting plus dissolving is negative. For very many nonpolar polymer-solvent systems, Xi is in the range of 0.3 to 0.4. [Pg.84]

Simple Cases. Nonpolar hydrocarbon solvents like cyclohexane and nonpolar polymers like polyisoprene follow the above rules, and correlations like that presented in Fig. 10 are quite precise. Here the intermolecular bonds are almost solely due to van der Waal s forces. [Pg.268]

In connection with the aforementioned study on polymerization mechanism of MMA77,78), Miyamoto et al. developed a preparatory method of separating blends of isotactic and syndiotactic PMMA82 The principle was based on a competitive adsorption of these different stereoisomeric polymers from a nonpolar solution (chloroform) onto an adsorbent surface (silica gel). The procedure was quite simple, as described below A given polymer blend was dissolved in chloroform, in which no stereocomplex formation usually occurs, and silica gel was then dispersed in this solution for adsorptive equilibration with the polymer species. The isotactic species could be isolated as the adsorbed component. In practice, its purity was ca. 80—90%, which depended on the added amount of silica gel. By repeating the same procedure, the purity could be enhanced. [Pg.215]

Proteins are often stabilized by low concentrations of simple alcohols or ketones76 and by higher concentrations of polyhydroxy alcohols, such as glycerol77 and sucrose,78 and also by certain inert, synthetic polymers such as polyethyleneglycol (PEG).79 The latter is a widely used precipitant. The polyhydroxy-alcohols and PEG are all hydrated but tend not to interact strongly with the protein molecules. On the other hand, simple alcohols may denature proteins by their interaction with nonpolar regions.77... [Pg.102]

Some mention should be made concerning the state of the polymer at the beginning of TLC experiment. Normally the sample is applied to the plate from solution in a relatively nonpolar solvent. This solvent is then evaporated, and the chromatographic plate is eluted with the chosen eluent. The drying step results in a polymer deposit which would be difficult to characterize it is not simply a precipitate, and it probably is not a simple adsorbed (multi) layer. Redissolution and entry into the mobile phase under displacement conditions occur in a minute or less (13). [Pg.63]

The bimolecular quenching rate constants, of pyrene fluorescence in various systems are presented in Table II. The values of with the quenchers such as oxygen, nitromethane, and sodium iodide in PA-I8K2 polymer-micellar solutions are much smaller than in water or in homogeneous nonpolar solvents (viz. heptane) and even smaller than in SDS micellar solutions. The data suggest that the penetration of the selected quenchers to the pyrene hosted in the polymer micelle is inhibited by the main chain of the host polymer micelle. This restrictive effect is larger than in simple micellar systems, and it results from the more rigid environment of pyrene in polymer micellar systems. [Pg.337]


See other pages where Simple nonpolar polymers is mentioned: [Pg.450]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.886]    [Pg.888]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.931]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.316]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.554 , Pg.555 ]




SEARCH



Nonpolar

Nonpolarized

Polymer nonpolar

© 2024 chempedia.info