Nomenclature systems compounds

The systematic lUPAC nomenclature of compounds tries to characterize compounds by a unique name. The names are quite often not as compact as the trivial names, which are short and simple to memorize. In fact, the lUPAC name can be quite long and cumbersome. This is one reason why trivial names are still heavily used today. The basic aim of the lUPAC nomenclature is to describe particular parts of the structure (fi agments) in a systematic manner, with special expressions from a vocabulary of terms. Therefore, the systematic nomenclature can be, and is, used in database systems such as the Chemical Abstracts Service (see Section 5.4) as index for chemical structures. However, this notation does not directly allow the extraction of additional information about the molecule, such as bond orders or molecular weight. 

The lUPAC rules are not the only nomenclature system in use today Chemical Abstracts Service sur veys all the worlds leading scientific journals that publish papers relating to chemistry and publishes brief abstracts of those papers The publication Chemical Abstracts and its indexes are absolutely es sential to the practice of chemistry For many years Chemical Abstracts nomenclature was very similar to lUPAC nomenclature but the tremendous explosion of chemical knowledge has required Chemical Abstracts to modify Its nomenclature so that its indexes are better adapted to computerized searching This means that whenever feasible a compound has a sin gle Chemical Abstracts name Unfortunately this Chemical Abstracts name may be different from any of the several lUPAC names In general it is easier to make the mental connection between a chemical structure and its lUPAC name than its Chemical Abstracts name... 

There are several types of nomenclature systems that are recognized. Which type to use is sometimes obvious from the nature of the compound. Substitutive nomenclature, in general, is preferred because of its broad applicability, but radicofunctional, additive, and replacement nomenclature systems are convenient in certain situations. 

The nomenclature of boron hydride derivatives has been somewhat confusing and many inconsistencies exist in the Hterature. The stmctures of some reported boron hydride clusters are so compHcated that only a stmctural drawing or graph, often accompanied by explanatory text, is used to describe them. Traditional nomenclature systems often can be used to describe compounds unambiguously, but the resulting descriptions may be so long and unwieldy that they are of Htde use. The lUPAC (7) and the Chemical Abstract Service (8) have made recommendations, and nomenclature methods have now been developed that can adequately handle nearly all clusters compounds however, these methods have yet to be widely adopted. Eor the most part, nomenclature used in the original Hterature is retained herein. 

Ollis and Ramsden state that A compound may be appropriately called mesoionic if it is a five-membered heterocycle which cannot be represented satisfactorily by any one covalent or polar structure and possesses a sextet of electrons in association with the five atoms comprising the ring . From the point of view of systematic nomenclature, compounds of this type are difficult to deal with, since most available nomenclature systems are designed so as to name one particular bond- and charge-localized canonical form. 

The tautomeric structure leads to ambiguities in the nomenclature of compounds in this series. Thus, 5-methyl- and 6-methylbenzo-furoxan denote two different molecules which, because of their interconversion, cannot be isolated separately at normal temperatures. Throughout this review, when we intend to refer to the ambiguous mixture, we shall use the system employing the lowest numbers. The above methyl derivative, for example, will be described as 6-methyl-benzofuroxan regardless of the form adopted in the crystal. When a... 

As noted in the text, chemists overwhelmingly use the nomenclature system devised and maintained by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, or IUPAC. Rules for naming monofunctional compounds were given throughout the text as each new functional group was introduced, and a list of where these rules can be found is given in Table A.l. 

Stock system the nomenclature system using oxidation numbers to differentiate between compounds or ions of a given element. 

Some of the rigidly systematic names selected by the Association for Science Education for their nomenclature list in 1985 from the IUPAC possibilities, and some of the systematic indexing names used by Chemical Abstracts since 1972, are given as synonyms in the Index of Chemical Names (Appendix 4). This should assist those coming into industry and research with a command of those nomenclature systems but who may be unfamiliar with the current variety of names used for chemicals. The inclusion where possible of the CAS Registry Number for each title compound should now simplify the clarification of any chemical name or synonym problems, by reference to the Registry Handbook or other CAS source. 

The naming of these three heterocyclic fused (5 5 5) ring systems has been carried out according to the IUPAC system of nomenclature. Some examples are given as follows compound la (Table 1) is named (3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenylthieno[2,3-3]pyrrolizin-8-one. Compound 15a (Table 2) is dithieno[3,2-3 2, 3 - 1thiophene. Compound 23a (Table 2) is dithieno[3,2-3 2, 3 - 1pyrrole. Compound 20a (Table 2) is dithicno[3,2-3 2, 3 -r/]thiophene-4,4-dio ide. Compound 13b (Table 2) is 3,4-dimethyldithieno[3,2-3 2, 3 -i/]thiophene-7,7-dioxide. Compound 38 (Table 4) is fM, r, r-10-azatricyclo[5.2.1.01 10]deca-2,5,8-triene. Compound 39 (Table 4) is cis,cis, m-10-azatricyclo[5.2.1.01 10]deca-2,8-diene. The nomenclature of compound 40 (Table 4) is 1,4,7 triaza tricy-clo[5.2.1.01,10]decane. 

Polymer nomenclature leaves much to be desired. A standard nomenclature system based on chemical structure as is used for small inorganic and organic compounds is most desired. 

In many cases, it will be noted that more than one name is suggested for a particular compound. Often a preferred name will be designated, but as there are several systematic or semi-systematic nomenclature systems it may not be possible, or even advisable, to recommend a unique name. In addition, many non-systematic (trivial) names are still in general use. Although it is hoped that these will gradually disappear from the literature, many are still retained for present use, although often in restricted circumstances. These restrictions are described in the text. The user of nomenclature should adopt the name most suitable for the purpose in hand. 

This is the principal nomenclature system used in organic chemistry, as described in the Guide to lUPAC Nomenclature of Organic Compounds, p. 18. It is based upon the name of a formal parent molecule (normally a hydride), which is then substituted. Although it is principally an oiganic nomenclature, it has been extended to names of hydrides of Groups 14, 15, 16 and 17. 

Polycyclic parent hydrides. These are classified as bridged polyalkanes (also known as von Baeyer bridged systems, from the nomenclature system developed to name them), spiro compounds, fused polycyclic systems and assemblies of identical rings. The four systems may be either carbocyclic or heterocyclic. In developing their names, the following principles are used. 

This chapter covers literature published since 1982 early materials are included here only where needed as a basis for describing further developments or where not previously mentioned in CHEC-1 <84CHEC-l(5)669>. The structural types surveyed here include 1,2,3-triazoles, benzotriazoles, their dihydro derivatives and carbocyclic fused compounds. Compounds with heterocyclic fused rings are not included. The nomenclature system was discussed in CHEC-T <84CHEC-I(5)670>. 

Further substitution of the peripheral carbon atoms of the cyclazines by heteroatoms (N, S, etc.) is indicated in this chapter according to the replacement nomenclature system (aza, thia, etc.). Although, strictly, this runs contrary to the rules,lc since it is a heterocyclic, not a hydrocarbon, system which is replaced, the connection between closely related compounds can more clearly be seen. It should be noted that Chemical Abstracts employs the systematic fusion nomenclature I, for instance, is pyrrolo[2,l,5-cd]indolizine. 

Generally, nomenclature systems use a base on which the name is constructed. This base can be derived from a parent compound name such as sil (from silane) in substitutive nomenclature (mainly used for organic compounds) or titan a central atom name such as cobalt in additive nomenclature (mainly used in coordination chemistry). 

We will base our study on the system developed by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. The system is called the IUPAC Rules. There are other semi-systematic nomenclature systems, and many individual compounds are known by nonsystematic or trivial names. These names will be given along with the IUPAC names when such trivial names are commonly used. 

---