Nomenclature generation

Organic polymers have traditionally been named on the basis of the monomer used, a hypothetical monomer, or a semi-systematic structure. Alternatively, they may be named in the same way as organic compounds, i.e., on the basis of a structure as drawn. The former method, often called source-based nomenclature or monomer-based nomenclature , sometimes results in ambiguity and multiple names for a single material. The latter method, termed structure-based nomenclature , generates a sometimes cumbersome unique name for a given polymer, independent of its source. Within their limitations, both types of names are acceptable and weU-documented. The use of stereochemical descriptors with both types of polymer nomenclature has been published. ... 

While the trivial and trade nomenclature in most cases has accidental character, the lUPAC Commission has worked out a series of rules [4] which allow the great majority of structures to be represented uniformly, though there still exists some ambiguity within this nomenclature. Thus, many structures can have more than one name. It is important that the rules of some dialects of the lUPAC systematic nomenclature are transformed into a program code. Thus, programs for generating the names from chemical structures, and vice versa (structures from names) have been created [5] (see Chapter II, Section 2 in the Handbook). 

Two-Dimensional Representation of Chemical Structures. The lUPAC standardization of organic nomenclature allows automatic translation of a chemical s name into its chemical stmcture, or, conversely, the naming of a compound based on its stmcture. The chemical formula for a compound can be translated into its stmcture once a set of semantic rules for representation are estabUshed (26). The semantic rules and their appHcation have been described (27,28). The inverse problem, generating correct names from chemical stmctures, has been addressed (28) and explored for the specific case of naming condensed benzenoid hydrocarbons (29,30). 

When applying this principle to replacement names generated from fusion nomenclature, it is essential to keep in mind that fusion names for hydrocarbons ending in -cycloalkene are for fully unsaturated skeletons the -ene ending implies whatever number of double bonds may be necessary, without a multiplier. Thus (117) has six double bonds in the twelve-membered ring, and one must add ten hydrogens to saturate it to the stage of a simple benzene derivative, compound (118). 

This reaction converts ribulose-5-P to another ketose, namely, xylulose-5-P. This reaction also proceeds by an enediol intermediate, but involves an inversion at C-3 (Figure 23.31). In the reaction, an acidic proton located a- to a carbonyl carbon is removed to generate the enediolate, but the proton is added back to the same carbon from the opposite side. Note the distinction in nomenclature here. Interchange of groups on a single carbon is an epimerization, and interchange of groups between carbons is referred to as an isomerization. 

Just as we did for PCR, we must determine the optimum number of PLS factors (rank) to use for this calibration. Since we have validation samples which were held in reserve, we can examine the Predicted Residual Error Sum of Squares (PRESS) for an independent validation set as a function of the number of PLS factors used for the prediction. Figure 54 contains plots of the PRESS values we get when we use the calibrations generated with training sets A1 and A2 to predict the concentrations in the validation set A3. We plot PRESS as a function of the rank (number of factors) used for the calibration. Using our system of nomenclature, the PRESS values obtained by using the calibrations from A1 to predict A3 are named PLSPRESS13. The PRESS values obtained by using the calibrations from A2 to predict the concentrations in A3... 

Common Definitions Membrane processes have been evolving since the 1960s with each application tending to generate its own terminology. Recommended nomenclature is provided along with alternatives in current use. 

The intense need for herbal information in response to consumer interest in natural products was an acute reminder that information and knowledge generated locally have an international role. Confusion created by multiple names and unreliable nomenclature and classification of natural products mirrors problems encountered with drug nomenclature in the 1960s. Our information deficit in this area is still large. Chapter 24 presents a discussion of natural products. 

---