Noise/drift calculations

PROS REJECT jcls Section 3.6, Fig. 1.29 In a production environment there are often several superimposed processes that yield measurement series like that depicted in the lower panel there is drift that unexpectedly changes slope, there is bias and measurement noise, and there are operators who take corrective action. The model includes the probability of drift occurring and a feed-back loop that permits both positive and negative coefficients. The operators can be ordered to react if a single value exceeds a set limit, or only if 2, 3, or more successive values do so. The program calculates the two-sided (asymmetric) total probability of a value being OOS and depicts this in the upper panel on a log(p) scale. The red horizontal is the upper limit on the total risk as set in cell B20. 

Figure 1.18 Methods for calculating short- and long-ten noise and drift for chromatographic detectors.

In the frame of the present review, we discussed different approaches for description of an overdamped Brownian motion based on the notion of integral relaxation time. As we have demonstrated, these approaches allow one to analytically derive exact time characteristics of one-dimensional Brownian diffusion for the case of time constant drift and diffusion coefficients in arbitrary potentials and for arbitrary noise intensity. The advantage of the use of integral relaxation times is that on one hand they may be calculated for a wide variety of desirable characteristics, such as transition probabilities, correlation functions, and different averages, and, on the other hand, they are naturally accessible from experiments. 

Nowadays, most chromatographic software is capable of calculating the detector noise and drift. Typically, the detector should be allowed to warm up and stabilize prior to the test. Temperature fluctuations should be avoided during the test. The noise and drift tests can be performed under static and dynamic conditions. For a static testing condition, the flow cell is filled with methanol, and no... 

In the following sections we first consider the case where the outlet mole fractions or partial pressures are measured directly, for example by a gas chromatograph, but due to noise or measurement error need to be adjusted in order to achieve the atomic balance required by equation 7.3. Next we consider the case of a mass spectrometer, where calibration is required to derive the partial pressures from mass spectrometer peak readings. In that case it turns out that the procedure used to achieve mass balance also provides a useful way to improve the calibration and to monitor possible changes (calibration drifts) in the mass spectrometer. Finally we consider the case where some components in the feed and/or product are not measured, due either to ignorance or to neglect. It turns out that even in this case it is possible to calculate good approximations to the outlet molar composition to be expected in order to maintain mass and atomic balance. 

One has to keep in mind that such a derivation always implies some assumptions concerning the stationarity of the analytical system and particularly the stationarity of the noise. In general, stationarity and the absence of a deterministic drifting baseline is assumed, although some derived expressions in the general form are valid for non-stationary noise. However, the derived theory can be used as a basis for the calculation of the remaining uncertainty in the case of a correction procedure for deterministic (for instance linear) baseline drift. 

Following the above described algorithm, peak optimal control forces and inter-story drifts should be calculated at Step 2. For this reason response of the optimal controlled stmcture to the artificial white noise ground motion is simulated. 

The Wiener process represents one possible form of diffusion processes. It is actually the integral of what in practical applications is called a white noise. The Wiener process with drift will be used in our application. The initial mean value (drift) is p and standard deviations for each time increment have been previously calculated—see Table 1. For our model we apply Wiener process with drift given by stochastic differential equation. 

Figure 13.11. Comparison of ion current stability between NanoESI and high-flow ESI and APCI techniques. The RSD of the baseline count rate is a measure of the high-frequency ion current fluctuations. The area counts were calculated over 3-s windows, approximating chromatographic peak width, taken at 10 separate segments of the 1.6-min trace from beginning to end. Only one segment is shown for each trace to illustrate the measurement. This is a measure of the low-frequency noise reflected in baseline drift. Similar experiments at intermediate flows under the conditions of Figure 13.1 A (not total consumption nanoESI conditions) verified the trend.

---