Nations approach implementation

If France, Germany, Sweden and the UK adopt different regulatory approaches, this research seeks to uncover which role these Member States have in the adoption of different types of EU legislation. It follows that this research must first establish if the regulatory approach of a Member State is consistent with its approach to EU decision-making. With the advent of REACH, the question now arises as to what effect these national approaches may have on REACH implementation, and what effect REACH will have on national approaches. 

Analysing national approaches allows for evaluation of the policy styles of the regulatory authorities. Because policy style influences how authorities set and implement regulation [377], they determine the efficiency and effectiveness of chemical risk management. An analysis of policy style also provides a basis for examining why the relationship between the national actors varies to such a large extent between the four countries. The overall position of each national approach is shown schematically in Figure 4.1 [376, 378]. 

The next Chapter exposes how without careful attention to particular issues during implementation the REACH legislative text is unlikely to deliver the recommendations identified in Table 4.6. Several examples are presented in Chapter 5 that illustrate how the strengths and weakness of the national approaches tend to hinder rather than facilitate EU decision-making. The proposed systems framework for decision-making under REACH then seeks to rectify these potential shortcomings of the legislation. 

The nations approach deals with both the equal treatment of individuals within multinational states and global justice with respect to political communities that advance claims to self-determination. In this section, I demonstrate that its implementation would provide for a more peaceful relationship between substate and... 

Asymmetrical warfare in all of its forms is a growing concern for the world community. Controlling conflicts of this type is important for world peace. The introduction of the nations approach, and the modified right in particular, would have a mitigating effect on some justifications for asymmetrical warfare and especially for terrorism enacted in the name of self-determination. The implementation of the nations approach and the modified right cannot eliminate all justifications for the actions of non-state combatants, but it renders invalid those that have to do with claims to self-determination and demands for the equality of status of substate and state-endowed groups. 

Some of the already existing mechanisms used to enforce international norms could support the implementation of the nations approach. The same types of international sanctions that exist now could be employed to secure the compliance of states that... 

When assessing potential tollers for a project where an international presence is prescribed or simply expanding your selection of available tollers, the same basic approach presented here can be used. However, some elements may need to be implemented differently, expanded, or combined to accurately depict a toller s capabilities when crossing national and cultural boundaries. A client should still seek the same ethics regarding safety, environmental responsibility, quality and contractual obligations as described previously. 

Methods submitted by industry are partly used for implementation in national collections of analytical methods (e.g., in the German Method Collection of 35 LMBG). This activity often involves a modification of the analytical procedure and extended validation. Some examples for this approach are discussed by Lutz Alder in this Handbook. 

---