Myocardial infarction thrombolytics

Arterial thrombi (white thrombi) are formed initially from both platelets and fibrin in medium-sized arteries on the basis of atherosclerosis. These thrombi can lead to symptoms of, among others, myocardial ischemia and myocardial infarction. The treatment is primarily aimed at prevention of thrombus formation with platelet aggregation inhibitors. For the treatment of myocardial infarction thrombolytic agents are used and for secondary prevention both oral anticoagulants and anti-platelet drugs are employed. 

Myocardial infarction -thrombolytic therapy [ENZYME APPLICATIONS - THERAPEUTIC] (Vol 9)... 

Thrombolytic Enzymes. Although atherosclerosis and the accompanying vascular wall defects are ultimately responsible for such diseases as acute pulmonary embolism, arterial occlusion, and myocardial infarction, the lack of blood flow caused by a fibrin clot directly results in tissue injury and in the clinical symptoms of these devastating diseases (54). Thrombolytic enzyme therapy removes the fibrin clot by dissolution, and has shown promise in the treatment of a number of thrombo-occlusive diseases (60). 

Compared to streptokinase, urokinase has been less extensively studied because of its high cost, ie, about 10 times that of a comparable treatment with streptokinase. In addition to the indications described for streptokinase, urokinase is indicated for use in patients with prior streptokinase treatment, or prior Streptococcal infection. Urokinase is commonly used at a loading dose of 4400 units /kg, with a maintenance intravenous infusion dose of 4400 units/kg/h for thromboses other than acute myocardial infarction. In the latter case, a much larger dose, ie, 0.5—2.0 million units/h or a bolus dose of 1.0 million units followed by a 60-min infusion with 1.0 million units, has been found optimal (106). An intracoronary dose of 2000 units/min for two hours was used in one comparative study with intracoronary streptokinase (107). In this study, urokinase exhibited efficacy equivalent to streptokinase with fewer side effects. Other studies with intracoronary urokinase have adrninistered doses ranging from 2,000 to 24,000 units/min with a reperfusion efficacy of 60—89% (108—112). In another urokinase trial, 2.0 million units were adrninistered intravenously, resulting in a thrombolytic efficacy of 60% (113). Effectiveness in terms of reduction in mortaUty rate has not been deterrnined because of the small number of patients studied. 

Krumholz HM, Pasternak RC, Weinstein MC, et al. Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in elderly patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1992 327 7-13. 

In situations where inappropriate clot formation results in the blockage of a blood vessel, the tissue damage that ensues depends, to a point, upon how long the clot blocks blood flow. Rapid removal of the clot can often minimize the severity of tissue damage. Thus, several thrombolytic (clot-degrading) agents have found medical application (Table 12.5). The market for an effective thrombolytic agent is substantial. In the USA alone, it is estimated that 1.5 million people suffer acute myocardial infarction each year, and there are another 0.5 million suffer strokes. 

Alteplase has proven effective in the early treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction (i.e. those treated within 12 h after the first symptoms occur). Significantly increased rates of patient survival (as measured 1 day and 30 days after the initial event) are noted when tPA is administered in favour of streptokinase, a standard therapy (see later). tPA has thus established itself as a first-line option in the management of acute myocardial infarction. A therapeutic dose of 90-100 mg (often administered by infusion over 90 min) results in a steady-state alteplase concentration of 3-4 mg l 1 during that period. However, the product is cleared rapidly by the liver, displaying a serum half-life of approximately 3 min. As is the case for most thrombolytic agents, the most significant risk associated with tPA administration is the possible induction of severe haemorrhage. 

Castillo, P.A., Palmer, C.S., Halpern, M.T., Hatziandreu, E.J., and Gersh, B.J. 1997. Cost-effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 31(5), 596-603. 

Hegele (H23) reported an acute reduction of Lp(a) during tPA infusion. The success of this type of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction seems to be unaffected by high Lp(a) levels (H32). 

H32. Hodenberg, E. von, and Kreuzer, J., Effects of lipoprotein(a) on success rate of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 67, 1349-1353 (1991). 

Andresen D, Steinbeck G, Bruggemann T, et al. Risk stratification following myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era a two-step strategy using noninvasive and invasive methods. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan... 

Franzosi MG, Santoro E, De Vita C, et al. Ten-year follow-up of the first megatrial testing thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction results of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nellTnfarto-l study. The GISSI Investigators. Circulation 1998 98 2659-2665. 

Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986 1 397-402. 

O Keefe JH, Jr., Rutherford BD, McConahay DR, et al. Early and late results of coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1989 64 1221-1230. 

Grines CL, Browne KF, Oneil W, et al., for the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study group. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993 328 673-679. 

Collen, D. (1998). Staphylokinase a potent, uniquely fibrin-selective thrombolytic agent. Nature Med. 4(3), 279-284. Collins, R. et al. (1997). Drug therapy—aspirin, heparin and fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 336(12), 847-860. 

Plasminogen, an inactive precursor, is activated to plasmin which as a protease is able to break down fibrin clots. The thrombolytic agents in use promote the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin at the site of a thrombus. Indications include post-myocardial infarction treatment. The thrombolytic must be administered within 6 hours for an optimal effect. Other indications are treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism, deep-vein thrombosis, acute arterial thrombosis and thromboembolism, as well as in the clearance of arteriovenous catheters and can-nulae. Agents are streptokinase, anistreplase, urokinase, alteplase, reteplase and tenecteplase. 

E. Therapeutic response Activase, and other thrombolytic agents, used in a timely manner during an evolving myocardial infarction, decrease mortality and improve left ventricular function. Resolution of chest pain, resolution of baseline EKG changes, reduced total creatine phospho-kinase (CPK) release, and preserved left ventricular function are evidence of cardiac reperfusion. Activase, administered within the first 3 hours of ischemic stroke onset, has been shown to improve recovery. 

E Role in therapy Thrombolytic agents currently licensed for the treatment of AMI in the United States include streptokinase, tissue plasminogen activator, anistreplase, reteplase, and tenecteplase. TNKase and alteplase have similar clinical efficacy for thrombolysis after myocardial infarction (i.e., similar mortality and intracranial hemorrhage rates). However, advantages of TNKase include ease and rapidity of administration, longer half-life, greater fibrin specificity, and lower noncerebral bleeding rates. Reteplase shares some characteristics of tenecteplase (e.g., similar half-life, rapid onset, and ease of administration). 

The paradigm shift in 1980 on the causation of acute myocardial infarction to acute coronary occlusion by a thrombus created the rationale for thrombolytic therapy of this common lethal disease. At that time—and for the first time-intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the European Cooperative Study Group trial was found to reduce mortality significantly. Later studies, with thousands of patients in each trial, provided enough statistical power for the 20% reduction in mortality to be considered statistically significant. Although the standard of care in areas with adequate facilities and experience in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) now favors catheterization and placement of a stent, thrombolytic therapy is still very important where PCI is not readily available. 

The proper selection of patients for thrombolytic therapy is critical. The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is made clinically and is confirmed by electrocardiography. Patients with ST-segment elevation and bundle branch block on electrocardiography have the best outcomes. All trials to date show the greatest benefit for thrombolytic therapy when it is given early, within 6 hours after symptomatic onset of acute myocardial infarction. 

---