MWNTs nanotubes

Carbon nanotubes can have one, two, or many sidewalls and are referred to as single-, double-, or multi-walled nanotubes (SWNT, DWNT, or MWNT). Nanotubes can be metallic, or semi-conducting depending on the chirality of the tube. Single-walled nanotubes (SWNT) are about 1 nm in diameter, and hundreds of nanometers long, whereas multi-walled nanotubes (MWNT) are like nested... 

Pt superfine clusters on conductive supports are effective catalysts of redox reactions proceeding in fuel cells. High specific surface, support conductivity, high dispersity (nanosizes of Pt clusters) and their strong fixation on a surface are necessary criterions of preparation of the effective catalyst. From these points of view CNM for example single- (SWNT) and multi-walled (MWNT) nanotubes, nanofibers (CNF) and x-ray amorphous carbon (AC) can be a successful supports of Pt clusters. 

Hou et al. (43) reported the poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites using single walled (SWNT), few walled (FWNT) and multi walled (MWNT) nanotubes. The nanotubes were covalently functionalized to generate acid functionalities on the sidewalls. The incorporation... 

Carbon nanotubes prepared by several methods are mixed with nanoparticles, amorphous carbon, fullerenes, and other contaminants [1576]. Nanotubes isolated from the mixture contain single-walled (SWNT) as well as multiwalled (MWNT) nanotubes. In general, the diameter of a SWNT is on the order of several nanometers, but the length can be several microns. Thus far, spectroscopic (mainly Raman) studies have been focused on SWNTs of small diameters (<2nm) that become metallic or semiconducting depending on their diameter and chirality. Chemical and physical... 

The yield strengths of defect-free SWNTs may be higher than that measured for Bacon s scroll structures, and measurements on defect-free carbon nanotubes may allow the prediction of the yield strength of a single, defect-free graphene sheet. Also, the yield strengths of MWNTs are subject to the same limitations discussed above with respect to tube slippage. All the discussion here relates to ideal nanotubes real carbon nanotubes may contain faults of various types that will influence their properties and require experimental measurements of their mechanical constants. 

Because direct calculation of thermal conductivity is difficulty 1], experimental measurements on composites with nanotubes aligned in the matrix could be a first step for addressing the thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes. High on-axis thermal conductivities for CCVD high-temperature treated carbon fibers have been obtained, but have not reached the in-plane thermal conductivity of graphite (ref. [3], Fig. 5.11, p. 115). We expect that the radial thermal conductivity in MWNTs will be very low, perhaps even lower than the c-axis thermal conductivity of graphite. 

Recently, TsHs has been encapsulated within single-walled (SWNTs) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) with internal diameters of 0.8-8 nm. It was shown that the best results were obtained when the internal diameters (1.4—1.5 nm for SWNTs and 1.0-3.0 nm for MWNTs) slightly exceeded the diameter of TsHs (1.2 nm). T8H8 was introduced in the gas phase and reacted with the nanotubes through van der Waals interactions. ... 

Fig. 3 shows the Raman spectra of the MWNT samples as a flmction of helium pressure. The peaks around 1280 cm", called the D-mode, are Imown to be attributed la amorphous carbons and defects of nanotubes, whereas the pe around 1600 cm", called the G-mode, are known to be due to the graphitic structure of carbon atoms. The G-mode of produced MWNTs was shifted to a lower wave number region (1595 cm" ) by the strain of the forming tube [6]. The intensity of MWNTs synftiesized under 250 Torr was lower than at other pressure. And the ratio of the G-mode to the D-mode was the hi t at pressure of 500 Torr. The highest purity of MWNTs was obtained when the pressure of helium is 500 Torr. 

Only a few in vivo dermal toxicity studies have been reported so far. Huczko and Lange [50] evaluated the potential of raw CNTs to induce skin irritation by conducting two routine dermatological tests (patch test on 40 volunteers with allergy susceptibilities and Draize rabbit eye test on four albino rabbits). Koyama etal. [51] showed the biological responses to four different types of carbon nanotubes (SWNTs, two types of MWNTs with different diameters, and cup-stacked carbon nanotubes) after their subcutaneous implantation in mice. Both tests [50, 51] showed no or poor irritation effects. However, the in vitro studies in epidermal cell lines exposed to CNTs, and also a more recent report on the toxic outcomes of topical exposure of mice to SWNTs [46], have raised concerns over these assessments. Clearly, this is an area requiring further scientific evaluation. 

Table 7.2 Summary of in vitro toxicity outcomes after exposure to CNTs. The term CNTs indicates that the material was not identified as single- (SWNTs) or multi-walled (MWNTs) carbon nanotubes. Percentage of catalytically active transition metals in the CNTs is reported when indicated by the authors. 

Another interesting type of novel carbons applicable for supercapacitors, consists of a carbon/carbon composite using nanotubes as a perfect backbone for carbonized polyacrylonitrile. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs), due to their entanglement form an interconnected network of open mesopores, which makes them optimal for assuring good mechanical properties of the electrodes while allowing an easy diffusion of ions. 

Since their first discovery by Iijima in 1991 [1], carbon nanotubes have attracted a great deal of interest due to their very exciting properties. Their structure is characterized by cylindrically shaped enclosed graphene layers that can form co-axially stacked multi-wall nanotubes (MWNTs) or single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs). Like in graphite, carbon atoms are strongly bonded to each other in the curved honeycomb network but have much weaker Van der Waals-type interaction with carbons belonging to... 

Unlike the smaller, spheroidal fullerenes discussed previously, carbon nanotubes are not easily solubilized, even in organic solution. The reality is that all SWNTs and MWNTs are insoluble in all solvent systems. They also have a strong tendency to bind together and aggregate due to van der Waals attractive forces along the length of the nanotube. Since the length-to-diameter... 

The demonstration that the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition process with azomethine ylides works with nanotubes implies that similar reactions developed for use with fullerenes also may be successful with carbon nanotubes. In particular, the cyclopropanation reactions discussed previously for the modification of Cg0, likely will work for derivatization of SWNTs and MWNTs (Zakharian et al., 2005). 

In view of the conductive and electrocatalytic features of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), AChE and choline oxidases (COx) have been covalently coimmobilized on multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) for the preparation of an organophosphorus pesticide (OP) biosensor [40, 41], Another OP biosensor has also been constructed by adsorption of AChE on MWNTs modified thick film [8], More recently AChE has been covalently linked with MWNTs doped glutaraldehyde cross-linked chitosan composite film [11], in which biopolymer chitosan provides biocompatible nature to the enzyme and MWNTs improve the conductive nature of chitosan. Even though these enzyme immobilization techniques have been reported in the last three decades, no method can be commonly used for all the enzymes by retaining their complete activity. 

---