Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

More complex distribution functions

In the Debye-Hiickel theory the probability of finding one ion of the ionic atmosphere lying in a given small region at a distance, r, from the central reference ion was calculated. However, a [Pg.411]

If there are three ions being considered, i.e. a central reference ion and two ions in the ionic atmosphere, there are three distances to specify, ri2, 13, 23. and the distribution function is written as g rn, n3,r23)- [Pg.412]

However, this does not cover all possibilities. The possible charges on the three ions must also be considered. For three ions there are four distribution functions which can be found  [Pg.412]

Because the reference ion is part of the ionic atmosphere of another ion chosen to be the reference ion, there are only these four possibilities. [Pg.412]

The power of this type of calculation is, in part, due to the ability of including all possible contributions to the potential energy from all conceivable interactions between the ions, and between the ions and the solvent and between solvent molecules. It is also open to the theoretician see how the distribution function alters as contributions to the total potential energy of the system are varied. [Pg.412]


For agitated suspensions, however, recent work suggests that micro-attrition of parent crystals can occur in agitated suspensions (Synowiec etal., 1993). Such breakage via micro-attrition will result in many fine crystals generated and a relatively unchanged parent particle (cf. secondary nucleation, see below) with a correspondingly more complex distribution function (Hill and Ng, 1995, 1996). These alternative attrition models are considered in more detail later. [Pg.142]

It should be indicated that a probability density function has been derived on the basis of maximum entropy formalism for the prediction of droplet size distribution in a spray resulting from the breakup of a liquid sheet)432 The physics of the breakup process is described by simple conservation constraints for mass, momentum, surface energy, and kinetic energy. The predicted, most probable distribution, i.e., maximum entropy distribution, agrees very well with corresponding empirical distributions, particularly the Rosin-Rammler distribution. Although the maximum entropy distribution is considered as an ideal case, the approach used to derive it provides a framework for studying more complex distributions. [Pg.252]

Several mathematical models are available for predicting the dissolution of particles of mixed size. Some are more complex than others and require lengthy calculations. The size of polydisperse drug particles can be represented with a distribution function. During the milling of solids, the distribution of particle sizes most often results in a log-normal distribution. A log-normal distribution is positively skewed such that there can exist a significant tail on the distribution, hence a number of large particles. The basic equation commonly used to describe the particle distribution is the log-normal function,... [Pg.153]

Different reactor networks can give rise to the same residence time distribution function. For example, a CSTR characterized by a space time Tj followed by a PFR characterized by a space time t2 has an F(t) curve that is identical to that of these two reactors operated in the reverse order. Consequently, the F(t) curve alone is not sufficient, in general, to permit one to determine the conversion in a nonideal reactor. As a result, several mathematical models of reactor performance have been developed to provide estimates of the conversion levels in nonideal reactors. These models vary in their degree of complexity and range of applicability. In this textbook we will confine the discussion to models in which a single parameter is used to characterize the nonideal flow pattern. Multiparameter models have been developed for handling more complex situations (e.g., that which prevails in a fluidized bed reactor), but these are beyond the scope of this textbook. [See Levenspiel (2) and Himmelblau and Bischoff (4).]... [Pg.396]

For high densities, g cannot be set equal to one, and the collision function becomes much more complex and so is not given here. It turns out, however, that instead of using the full radial distribution function, it is sufficient to use the value at contact r — R, so that we define a new function ... [Pg.117]

Pyridinecarboxaldehyde, 3. Possible hydration of the aldehyde group makes the aqueous solution chemistry of 3 potentially more complex and interesting than the other compounds. Hydration is less extensive with 3 than 4-pyridinecarboxaldehyde but upon protonation, about 80% will exist as the hydrate (gem-diol). The calculated distribution of species as a function of pH is given in Figure 4 based on the equilibrium constants determined by Laviron (9). [Pg.390]

Detailed modeling study of practical sprays has a fairly short history due to the complexity of the physical processes involved. As reviewed by O Rourke and Amsden, 3l() two primary approaches have been developed and applied to modeling of physical phenomena in sprays (a) spray equation approach and (b) stochastic particle approach. The first step toward modeling sprays was taken when a statistical formulation was proposed for spray analysis. 541 Even with this simplification, however, the mathematical problem was formidable and could be analyzed only when very restrictive assumptions were made. This is because the statistical formulation required the solution of the spray equation determining the evolution of the probability distribution function of droplet locations, sizes, velocities, and temperatures. The spray equation resembles the Boltzmann equation of gas dynamics[542] but has more independent variables and more complex terms on its right-hand side representing the effects of nucleations, collisions, and breakups of droplets. [Pg.325]

The greater number of folds in larger proteomes is intuitively obvious simply because the functioning of more complex organisms is expected to require a greater structural diversity of proteins. From a different perspective, the increase of diversity follows from a stochastic model, which describes a proteome as a finite sample from an infinite pool of proteins with a particular distribution of fold fractions ( a bag of proteins ). A previous random simulation analysis suggested that the stochastic model significantly (about twofold) underestimates the number of different folds in the proteomes (Wolf et al., 1999). In other words, the structural diversity of real proteomes does not seem to follow... [Pg.268]

In spite of this variation in molecular weights and solubilities humic acid and fulvic acid have a very similar chemical composition. These acids consist of aromatic moieties such as phenols, benzenepolycarboxylic acids, hydroxybenzenepolycarbo-xylic acids, 1,2-dihydroxybenzene carboxylic acids, together with more complex condensed structures and polycylic compounds. It is conjectured that these various units are joined together by aliphatic chains (45, 54) the distribution of functional groups is presented in Table 5. [Pg.57]

By employing a similar procedure as in Section 7.2, we can compute all the distribution functions and the corresponding correlation functions of this system. As an example we derive here the expression for the 1, / pair distribution, and the corresponding pair correlation. The procedure is the same as in Section 7.2, with the additional complexity that we now have two occupied states rather than one as in Section 7.2. [On the other hand, expressions (7.2.24) and (7.2.25) are more general in the sense that they apply to any state a and p. Here, we are interested in specific states, i.e., states such as site i is occupied, for calculating cooperativi-ties.] The probability of finding site 1 occupied and site I occupied is ... [Pg.247]

Note 1 An infinite number of molar-mass averages can in principle be defined, but only a few types of averages are directly accessible experimentally. The most important averages are defined by simple moments of the distribution functions and are obtained by methods applied to systems in thermodynamic equilibrium, such as osmometry, light scattering and sedimentation equilibrium. Hydrodynamic methods, as a rule, yield more complex molar-mass averages. [Pg.49]

Mallinson et al. (1988) have performed an analysis of a set of static theoretical structure factors based on a wave function of the octahedral, high-spin hexa-aquairon(II) ion by Newton and coworkers (Jafri et al. 1980, Logan et al. 1984). To simulate the crystal field, the occupancy of the orbitals was modified to represent a low-spin complex with preferential occupancy of the t2g orbitals, rather than the more even distribution found in the high-spin complex. The complex ion (Fig. 10.14) was centered at the corners of a cubic unit cell with a = 10.000 A and space group Pm3. Refinement of the 1375 static structure factors (sin 8/X < 1.2 A 1) gave an agreement factor of R = 4.35% for the spherical-atom model with variable positional parameters (Table 10.12). Addition of three anharmonic thermal... [Pg.242]


See other pages where More complex distribution functions is mentioned: [Pg.411]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.266]   


SEARCH



Complex functions

Complexity distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info