Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Monometallic

Many mechanisms have been proposed that develop this picture more specifically. These are often so specific that they cannot be generalized beyond the systems for which they are proposed. Two schemes that do allow some generalization are presented here. Although they share certain common features, these mechanisms are distinguished by the fact that one-the monometallic model-does not include any participation by the representative metal in the mechanism. The second—the bimetallic model—does assume the involvement of both metals in the mechanism. [Pg.491]

The monometallic mechanism is illustrated in Fig. 7.13a. It involves the monomer coordinating with an alkylated titanium atom. The insertion of the monomer into the titanium-carbon bond propagates the chain. As shown in... [Pg.491]

Figure 7.13 (a) The monometallic mechanism. The square indicates a vacant... [Pg.492]

Polypropylene polymerized with triethyl aluminum and titanium trichloride has been found to contain various kinds of chain ends. Both terminal vinylidene unsaturation and aluminum-bound chain ends have been identified. Propose two termination reactions which can account for these observations. Do the termination reactions allow any discrimination between the monometallic and bimetallic propagation mechanisms ... [Pg.493]

These reactions appear equally feasible for titanium in either the monometallic or bimetallic intermediate. Thus they account for the different types of end groups in the polymer, but do not differentiate between propagation intermediates. [Pg.495]

Fig. 3. Monometallic mechanism of formation for polymer chain growth on transitionmetal catalyst, where (D) represents a coordination vacancy. Fig. 3. Monometallic mechanism of formation for polymer chain growth on transitionmetal catalyst, where (D) represents a coordination vacancy.
Low pressure operation became routine with the appHcation of new catalysts that are resistant to deactivation and withstand the low pressures. The catalysts are bimetallic most incorporate rhenium as well as platinum (95). The stmctures of these catalysts are stiU not well understood, but under some conditions the two metals form small alloylike stmctures, which resist deactivation better than the monometallic catalyst. [Pg.182]

The conclusion may be drawn that the data obtained of comparative studies of olefin polymerization by the one-component catalyst (TiCl2) and two-component systems (TiCl2 + AlEtxCl ) confirm the concept of monometallic active centers on the surface of titanium chlorides developed by Cossee and Arlman (170-173). [Pg.200]

Ragno (Ref 3) prepd a number of monometallic salts of 2,4-dinitrocompds of the general formula (02N)2C6H3.NH.N C.CH3.C00M. They all proved to be more or less expl. The most expl was the Pb salt - it expld violently... [Pg.1004]

The smallest monometallic Au clusters are the two AU4 clusters, Au4(PPh3)4l2 and Au4(dppm)3l2. Both clusters contain a tetrahedral AU4 core . In Au4(PPhj)4l2 the... [Pg.477]

A MgO-supported W—Pt catalyst has been prepared from IWsPttCOIotNCPh) (i -C5H5)2l (Fig. 70), reduced under a Hs stream at 400 C, and characterized by IR, EXAFS, TEM and chemisorption of Hs, CO, and O2. Activity in toluene hydrogenation at 1 atm and 60 C was more than an order of magnitude less for the bimetallic cluster-derived catalyst, than for a catalyst prepared from the two monometallic precursors. [Pg.113]

MgO-supported model Mo—Pd catalysts have been prepared from the bimetallic cluster [Mo2Pd2 /z3-CO)2(/r-CO)4(PPh3)2() -C2H )2 (Fig. 70) and monometallic precursors. Each supported sample was treated in H2 at various temperatures to form metallic palladium, and characterized by chemisorption of H2, CO, and O2, transmission electron microscopy, TPD of adsorbed CO, and EXAFS. The data showed that the presence of molybdenum in the bimetallic precursor helped to maintain the palladium in a highly dispersed form. In contrast, the sample prepared from the monometallie precursors was characterized by larger palladium particles and by weaker Mo—Pd interactions. ... [Pg.116]

These processes are very rapid and allow the preparation of inorganic supports in one step. This technique allows large-scale manufacturing of supports such as titania, fumed silica, and aluminas. Sometimes the properties of the material differ from the conventional preparation routes and make this approach unique. Multicomponent systems can be also prepared, either by multimetallic solutions or by using a two-nozzle system fed with monometallic solutions [22]. The as-prepared powder can be directly deposited onto substrates, and the process is termed combustion chemical vapor deposition [23]. [Pg.122]

Fig. 4 shows the current density over the supported catalysts measured in 1 M methanol containing 0.5 M sulfuric acid. During forward sweep, the methanol electro-oxidation started to occur at 0.35 V for all catalysts, which is typical feature for monometallic Pt catalyst in methanol electro-oxidation [8]. The maximum current density was decreased in the order of Pt/CMK-1 > Pt/CMK-3 > Pt/Vulcan. It should be noted that the trend of maximum current density was identical to that of metal dispersion (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). Therefore, it is concluded that the metal dispersion is a critical factor determining the catalytic performance in the methanol electro-oxidation. Fig. 4 shows the current density over the supported catalysts measured in 1 M methanol containing 0.5 M sulfuric acid. During forward sweep, the methanol electro-oxidation started to occur at 0.35 V for all catalysts, which is typical feature for monometallic Pt catalyst in methanol electro-oxidation [8]. The maximum current density was decreased in the order of Pt/CMK-1 > Pt/CMK-3 > Pt/Vulcan. It should be noted that the trend of maximum current density was identical to that of metal dispersion (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). Therefore, it is concluded that the metal dispersion is a critical factor determining the catalytic performance in the methanol electro-oxidation.
The monometallic Pt pre-semed two inardina in the low toqrera-tures region (194 and 269°C) and a sharper peak at 560°C. This type of TPRproffle could be attributed to Pt exchanged at different sites in the 5. Effect of water addition on the NO (B) mordenite structure. The consump-... [Pg.637]

The catalyst remained stable for a long diile (over 50 h) under reaction conditions at the above ten erature. In order to try to tmderstand this interesting behavior, let us first focus our attention on the behavior of monometallic cobalt and platinum mordenite samples. [Pg.638]

From a general point of view, a monometallic catalyst can be considered as surface metal atoms linked together, forming an ensemble on the surface [160]. [Pg.195]

Synthesis methods such as those described earlier for monometallics have been applied with metal carbonyls incorporating two metals. The resultant supported species may be small supported metal clusters [41,42], and, as for monometallics, the usual products are supported species that are nonuniform in both composition and structure [42]. There are several examples of well-defined metal carbonyl clusters in this category but hardly any examples of well-defined decarbonylated bimetalhcs on supports. [Pg.224]

Herein we briefly mention historical aspects on preparation of monometallic or bimetallic nanoparticles as science. In 1857, Faraday prepared dispersion solution of Au colloids by chemical reduction of aqueous solution of Au(III) ions with phosphorous [6]. One hundred and thirty-one years later, in 1988, Thomas confirmed that the colloids were composed of Au nanoparticles with 3-30 nm in particle size by means of electron microscope [7]. In 1941, Rampino and Nord prepared colloidal dispersion of Pd by reduction with hydrogen, protected the colloids by addition of synthetic pol5mer like polyvinylalcohol, applied to the catalysts for the first time [8-10]. In 1951, Turkevich et al. [11] reported an important paper on preparation method of Au nanoparticles. They prepared aqueous dispersions of Au nanoparticles by reducing Au(III) with phosphorous or carbon monoxide (CO), and characterized the nanoparticles by electron microscopy. They also prepared Au nanoparticles with quite narrow... [Pg.49]

Usually bimetallic nanoparticles as well as monometallic ones are characterized by many probing tools such as UV-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), EXAFS, infrared spectroscopy of adsorbed CO (CO-IR), and so on [1,2]. [Pg.50]

The synthesis of bimetallic nanoparticles is mainly divided into two methods, i.e., chemical and physical method, or bottom-up and top-down method. The chemical method involves (1) simultaneous or co-reduction, (2) successive or two-stepped reduction of two kinds of metal ions, and (3) self-organization of bimetallic nanoparticle by physically mixing two kinds of already-prepared monometallic nanoparticles with or without after-treatments. Bimetallic nanoparticle alloys are prepared usually by the simultaneous reduction while bimetallic nanoparticles with core/shell structures are prepared usually by the successive reduction. In the preparation of bimetallic nanoparticles, one of the most interesting aspects is a core/shell structure. The surface element plays an important role in the functions of metal nanoparticles like catal5dic and optical properties, but these properties can be tuned by addition of the second element which may be located on the surface or in the center of the particles adjacent to the surface element. So, we would like to use following marks to inscribe the bimetallic nanoparticles composed of metal 1, Mi and metal 2, M2. [Pg.50]


See other pages where Monometallic is mentioned: [Pg.492]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.53]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.192 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.122 , Pg.373 ]




SEARCH



Acetylene monometallation

Active centres monometallic

Active monometallic

Bimetallic and Monometallic Mechanisms

Catalyst monometallic

Characterization of the Host Monometallic Catalysts

Involving Monometallic Mechanism

Metal monometallic catalysts

Molybdenum complexes monometallic

Monometalated

Monometalated compounds

Monometallic Co

Monometallic Cu

Monometallic alkoxides

Monometallic catalytic data

Monometallic catalytic material

Monometallic characterizing

Monometallic clusters

Monometallic complexes

Monometallic compounds

Monometallic iron catalysts

Monometallic lanthanide complexes

Monometallic mechanism

Monometallic mechanism evidence

Monometallic mechanism olefin polymerization

Monometallic mechanism reactivities

Monometallic metal-support interaction

Monometallic nanocluster

Monometallic organolithium reagents

Monometallic organomagnesium reagents

Monometallic particles

Monometallic stability

Monometallic supported

Monometallic surfaces

Monometallics single metals on amorphous alumina

Pt Monometallic and Bimetallic Surfaces

Semi-batch, Non-preconditioned, Monometallic Catalytic Data

Synthesis of monometallic nanoclusters

Ziegler polymerizations monometallic

Ziegler-Natta polymerization monometallic mechanism

© 2024 chempedia.info