Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Active monometallic

Figure 3.3.11 Computational volcano curve of the ORR activity of well-defined metal surfaces versus their oxygen chemisorption energy, A/i0. Metals on the left bind oxygen too strongly, resulting in low ORR activity metals on the right bind too weakly, also resulting in low ORR rates. Pt is the most active monometallic ORR catalyst. The top of the volcano curve represents an unknown optimal catalyst and can be achieved by lowering the O chemisorption energy of Pt somewhat (arrow and red dotted lines). Figure adapted from [15]. Figure 3.3.11 Computational volcano curve of the ORR activity of well-defined metal surfaces versus their oxygen chemisorption energy, A/i0. Metals on the left bind oxygen too strongly, resulting in low ORR activity metals on the right bind too weakly, also resulting in low ORR rates. Pt is the most active monometallic ORR catalyst. The top of the volcano curve represents an unknown optimal catalyst and can be achieved by lowering the O chemisorption energy of Pt somewhat (arrow and red dotted lines). Figure adapted from [15].
Kariya et al. performed dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane and other cycloalkanes over platinum, palladium and rhodium monometallic and platinum/palladium, platinum/rhodium, platinum/molybdenum, platinum/tungsten, platinum/rhenium platinum/osmium and platinum/iridium catalysts supported on both petroleum coke active carbon and on alumina between 375 and 400 °C [279]. The platinum catalyst supported by petroleum active carbon showed the highest activity. While platinum was the most active monometallic catalyst, its activity could be increased by addition of molybdenum, tungsten and rhenium. [Pg.106]

The conclusion may be drawn that the data obtained of comparative studies of olefin polymerization by the one-component catalyst (TiCl2) and two-component systems (TiCl2 + AlEtxCl ) confirm the concept of monometallic active centers on the surface of titanium chlorides developed by Cossee and Arlman (170-173). [Pg.200]

A MgO-supported W—Pt catalyst has been prepared from IWsPttCOIotNCPh) (i -C5H5)2l (Fig. 70), reduced under a Hs stream at 400 C, and characterized by IR, EXAFS, TEM and chemisorption of Hs, CO, and O2. Activity in toluene hydrogenation at 1 atm and 60 C was more than an order of magnitude less for the bimetallic cluster-derived catalyst, than for a catalyst prepared from the two monometallic precursors. [Pg.113]

By XPS spectra, Endo et al. [96] confirmed that formation of binary structure prevented Pd atoms from oxidation in the AuPd and PtPd bimetallic nanoparticles which exhibited higher catal5hic activity than monometallic ones. Wang et al. [112]. characterized PtCu bimetallic alloy nanoparticles Ijy XPS. XPS revealed that both elements in the nanoparticles are in zero-valence and possess the characteristic metallic binding energy. [Pg.63]

In 1989, we developed colloidal dispersions of Pt-core/ Pd-shell bimetallic nanoparticles by simultaneous reduction of Pd and Pt ions in the presence of poly(A-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP) [15]. These bimetallic nanoparticles display much higher catalytic activity than the corresponding monometallic nanoparticles, especially at particular molecular ratios of both elements. In the series of the Pt/Pd bimetallic nanoparticles, the particle size was almost constant despite composition and all the bimetallic nanoparticles had a core/shell structure. In other words, all the Pd atoms were located on the surface of the nanoparticles. The high catalytic activity is achieved at the position of 80% Pd and 20% Pt. At this position, the Pd/Pt bimetallic nanoparticles have a complete core/shell structure. Thus, one atomic layer of the bimetallic nanoparticles is composed of only Pd atoms and the core is completely composed of Pt atoms. In this particular particle, all Pd atoms, located on the surface, can provide catalytic sites which are directly affected by Pt core in an electronic way. The catalytic activity can be normalized by the amount of substance, i.e., to the amount of metals (Pd + Pt). If it is normalized by the number of surface Pd atoms, then the catalytic activity is constant around 50-90% of Pd, as shown in Figure 13. [Pg.65]

The bimetallic nanoparticles were generally more active than the corresponding monometallic nanoparticles. The highest catalytic activity was observed for Au/Rh and/or... [Pg.67]

Much effort has been expanded in drawing mechanistic inferences from the observation that cofacial bismetalloporphyrins containing a non-redox-active metal ion are fairly selective catalysts (e.g., (DPA)CoM, where M = Lu, Sc, Al, Ag, Pd, 2H, i.e., monometallic porphyrins Fig. 18.15). At least two hypotheses have been proposed (i) polarization of the 0-0 bond in catalytic intermediates by the second ion (on an N-H moiety) acting as a Lewis acid [CoUman et al., 1987, 1994] and (ii) spatial positioning of H+ donors especially favorable for proton transfer to the terminal O atoms of coordinated O2 [Ni et al., 1987 Rosenthal and Nocera, 2007]. To the best of my knowledge, neither hypothesis has yet been convincingly proven nor resulted in improved ORR catalysts. When seeking stereoelectronic rational of the observed av values, it is useful to be mindful that a fair number of simple Co porphyrins are also relatively selective ORR catalysts (Section 18.4.2). [Pg.671]

The alternative mechanism (Fig. 18.16, mechanism B) is based on the fully reduced [(dipor)Co2] state as the redox-active form of the catalyst. The redox equilibrium between the mixed-valence and fully reduced forms is shifted toward the catalytically inactive mixed-valence state, and hence controls the amount of catalytically active species in the catalytic cycle and contributes to the — 60 mV/pH dependence. The fully reduced form is known to bind O2 (probably reversibly) in organic solvents [LeMest et al., 1997 Fukuzumi et al., 2004], and the resulting diamagnetic adducts are typically viewed as a pair of Co ions bridged by a peroxide, which are of course quite common in the O2 chemistry of nonporphyrin Co complexes. To obtain the —60 mV/pH dependence of the catalytic turnover rate, a protonation step is required either prior to the TDS or as the TDS. Mechanism B cannot be extended to monometallic cofacial porphyrins or heterometallic porphyrins with a redox-inert ion, but there is no reason to assume that the two classes of cofacial porphyrin catalysts, with rather different catalytic performance (Fig. 18.15), must follow the same mechanism. [Pg.674]

Li and Armor reported that Co-exchanged zeolites present a very high catalytic performance for the CH4-SCR, even in oxygen excess conditions [1, 3], Bimetallic Pt-and Pd-Co zeolites have revealed an increase of activity, selectivity towards N2 and stability, when compared with monometallic Co catalysts [4-8] even in the presence of water in the feed. Recent works show that these catalytic improvements are due to the presence of specific metal species as isolated metal ions, clusters and oxides and their location inside the cavities or in the external surface of zeolite crystallites [9, 10],... [Pg.279]


See other pages where Active monometallic is mentioned: [Pg.135]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.707]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.118]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.140 , Pg.206 , Pg.271 ]




SEARCH



Active centres monometallic

Monometallic

© 2024 chempedia.info