Relativistic momentum

Turning now to the non-relativistic motion, one expands the positive (or electronic) energy-momentum relativistic above solution in term of (v/c) yielding in the first order expansion. 

Which solved for the particle/system s velocity generated the energy-momentum relativistic relationship, very useful in nuclear and theory of fields and quantum particles... 

For the feedback electron, having lost its bonding to the atom, the momentum relativistic expression can be given as ... 

Dirac showed in 1928 dial a fourth quantum number associated with intrinsic angidar momentum appears in a relativistic treatment of the free electron, it is customary to treat spin heiiristically. In general, the wavefimction of an electron is written as the product of the usual spatial part (which corresponds to a solution of the non-relativistic Sclnodinger equation and involves oidy the Cartesian coordinates of the particle) and a spin part a, where a is either a or p. A connnon shorthand notation is often used, whereby... 

The fourth quantum number is called the spin angular momentum quantum number for historical reasons. In relativistic (four-dimensional) quantum mechanics this quantum number is associated with the property of symmetry of the wave function and it can take on one of two values designated as -t-i and — j, or simply a and All electrons in atoms can be described by means of these four quantum numbers and, as first enumerated by W. Pauli in his Exclusion Principle (1926), each electron in an atom must have a unique set of the four quantum numbers. 

The presence of the momentum operator means that the small component basis set must contain functions which are derivatives of the large basis set. The use of kinetic balance ensures that the relativistie solution smoothly reduees to the non-relativistic wave function as c is increased. 

It is easy to invent rules that conserve particle number, energy, momentum and so on, and to smooth out the apparent lack of structural symmetry (although we have cheated a little in our example of a random walk because the circular symmetry in this case is really a statistical phenomenon and not a reflection of the individual particle motion). The more interesting question is whether relativistically correct (i.e. Lorentz invariant) behavior can also be made to emerge on a Cartesian lattice. Toffoli ([toff89], [toffSOb]) showed that this is possible. 

In this model the gas particles are assumed to show no interactions between each other. This model can be realized or at least approached closely in a physical sense, since under conditions of low pressure and high temperatures interaction between particles becomes progressively weaker. Another example consists in the relationship between relativistic and classifical mechanics. The relativistic expression for momentum. 

Historical Background.—Relativistic quantum mechanics had its beginning in 1900 with Planck s formulation of the law of black body radiation. Perhaps its inception should be attributed more accurately to Einstein (1905) who ascribed to electromagnetic radiation a corpuscular character the photons. He endowed the photons with an energy and momentum hv and hv/c, respectively, if the frequency of the radiation is v. These assignments of energy and momentum for these zero rest mass particles were consistent with the postulates of relativity. It is to be noted that zero rest mass particles can only be understood within the framework of relativistic dynamics. 

In order to arrive at an equation for a relativistic particle of rest mass m and spin s we can proceed in essentially the same way. If in the relation between energy and momentum for a relativistic particle 3... 

Rate of change of observables, 477 Ray in Hilbert space, 427 Rayleigh quotient, 69 Reduction from functional to algebraic form, 97 Regula fold method, 80 Reifien, B., 212 Relative motion of particles, 4 Relative velocity coordinate system and gas coordinate system, 10 Relativistic invariance of quantum electrodynamics, 669 Relativistic particle relation between energy and momentum, 496 Relativistic quantum mechanics, 484 Relaxation interval, 385 method of, 62 oscillations, 383 asymptotic theory, 388 discontinuous theory, 385 Reliability, 284... 

The position, momentum, and energy are all dynamical quantities and consequently possess quantum-mechanical operators from which expectation values at any given time may be determined. Time, on the other hand, has a unique role in non-relativistic quantum theory as an independent variable dynamical quantities are functions of time. Thus, the uncertainty in time cannot be related to a range of expectation values. 

Following the hypothesis of electron spin by Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit, P. A. M. Dirac (1928) developed a quantum mechanics based on the theory of relativity rather than on Newtonian mechanics and applied it to the electron. He found that the spin angular momentum and the spin magnetic moment of the electron are obtained automatically from the solution of his relativistic wave equation without any further postulates. Thus, spin angular momentum is an intrinsic property of an electron (and of other elementary particles as well) just as are the charge and rest mass. 

To provide a mathematical description of a particle in space it is essential to specify not only its mass, but also its position (perhaps with respect to an arbitrary origin), as well as its velocity (and hence its momentum). Its mass is constant and thus independent of its position and velocity, at least in the absence of relativistic effects. It is also independent of the system of coordinates used to locate it in space. Its position and velocity, on the other hand, which have direction as well as magnitude, are vector quantities. Their descriptions depend on the choice of coordinate system. In this chapter Heaviside s notation will be followed, viz. a scalar quantity is represented by a symbol in plain italics, while a vector is printed in bold-face italic type. 

It has been shown that in a relativistic treatment neither the orbital angular momentum l nor the spin angular momentum s of an electron are good quantum numbers, but the vector sum is ... 

The relativistic expression for the energy of a free point particle with rest mass m and momentum p is... 

In non-relativistic Schrodinger theory every component of the orbital angular momentum L = r x p, as well as L2, commutes with the Hamiltonian H = p2/2m + V of a spinless particle in a central field. As a result, simultaneous eigenstates of the operators H, L2 and Lz exist in Schrodinger theory, with respective eigenvalues of E, l(l + l)h2 and mh. In Dirac s theory, however, neither the components of L, nor L2, commute with the Hamiltonian 10. 

Schrodinger s equation has solutions characterized by three quantum numbers only, whereas electron spin appears naturally as a solution of Dirac s relativistic equation. As a consequence it is often stated that spin is a relativistic effect. However, the fact that half-integral angular momentum states, predicted by the ladder-operator method, are compatible with non-relativistic systems, refutes this conclusion. The non-appearance of electron... 

As is well known (Chirikov, 1979 Izrailev, 1990), the phase-space evolution of the norelativistic classical kicked rotor is described by nonrelativistic standard map. The analysis of this map shows that the motion of the nonrelativistic kicked rotor is accompanied by unlimited diffusion in the energy and momentum. However, this diffusion is suppressed in the quantum case (Casati et.al., 1979 Izrailev, 1990). Such a suppression of diffusive growth of the energy can be observed when one considers the (classical) relativistic extention of the classical standard map (Nomura et.al., 1992) which was obtained recently by considering the motion of the relativistic electron in the field of an electrostatic wave packet. The relativistic generalization of the standard map is obtained recently (Nomura et.al., 1992)... 

Note that the Casimir calculation under the presence of fermionic on-relativistic) matter fields simplifies enormously since the presence of the second scale, the chemical potential p,=h2k2F/2rn or the Fermi momentum kF, provides for a natural UV-cxAoii, Any = p, and kuv = kF- Therefore the Casimir energy for fermions between two impenetrable (parallel) planes at a distance L is simply given as... 

Consider again non-relativistic fermions. Their BCS spectrum (for homogeneous systems) is isotropic when the polarizing field drives apart the Fermi surfaces of spin-up and down fermions the phase space overlap is lost, the pair correlations are suppressed, and eventually disappear at the Chandrasekhar-Clogston limit. The LOFF phase allows for a finite center-of-mass momentum of Cooper pairs Q and the quasiparticle spectrum is of the form... 

For large enough asymmetries the homogeneous state becomes unstable towards formation of either the LOFF phase - a superconducting state with nonzero center-of-mass momentum of the Cooper pairs, or the DFS phase - a superconducting state which requires a quadrapole deformation of Fermi surfaces. A combined treatment of these phases in non-relativistic systems shows that while the LOFF phase corresponds to a local minimum, the DFS phase has energy lower that the LOFF phase. These phases break either the rotational, the translational or both symmetries. 

The last feature requires a new definition and formulation of SSP or FM in relativistic systems since spin is no more a good quantum number in relativistic theories spin couples with momentum and its direction changes during the motion. It is well known that the Pauli-Lubanski vector W1 is the four vector to represent the spin degree of freedom in a covariant form,... 

---