Relativistic motion

Propagation in a medium of a coherent optical wave packet whose longitudinal and transverse sizes are both of a few wavelength and whose field amplitude can induce relativistic motion of electrons is a novel challenging topic to be investigated in the general field of the so-called relativistic optics [11]. Theory and simulation have been applied to this problem for a few decades. A number of experiments have been performed since ultrashort intense laser pulses became available in many laboratories. 

Conditions in Weak Fields,—If the relativistic term is more important than the electric, we have to take it into account first. The motion without electric field is then the relativistic motion, and, instead of the first equation (7), we should take the equation corresponding to this case. The main feature of the relativistic motion is that in it the characteristic value Eo is a ftmction, not only of the quantic number /, but also of n. This is, in fact, the only point of any importance for our piupose if we bear it in mind, we may neglect relativity in every other respect and use the same analysis as in the previous case. Instead of (15), we shall have for the total quantic number 1 = 2 two possible expressions of 0, corresponding to w = 1 and w = 0,... 

The group velocity of de Broglie matter waves are seen to be identical with particle velocity. In this instance it is the wave model that seems not to need the particle concept. However, this result has been considered of academic interest only because of the dispersion of wave packets. Still, it cannot be accidental that wave packets have so many properties in common with quantum-mechanical particles and maybe the concept was abandoned prematurely. What it lacks is a mechanism to account for the appearance of mass, charge and spin, but this may not be an insurmountable problem. It is tempting to associate the rapidly oscillating component with the Compton wavelength and relativistic motion within the electronic wave packet. 

According to general properties of Pauli matrices (a p)2 = p2 hence (9) is recognized as Schrodinger s equation, with E and p in operator form. On defining the electronic wave functions as spinors both Dirac s and Schrodinger s equations are therefore obtained as the differential equation describing respectively non-relativistic and relativistic motion of an electron with spin, which appears naturally. 

The relativistically-covariant description of the motion of an electron in quantum mechanics was first given by Dirac (1928). We consider the relativistic motion of an electron in the potential of an atom. 

In the absence of interactions, electrons are described by the Dirac equation (1928), which rules out the quantum relativistic motion of an electron in static electric and magnetic fields E= yU and B = curl A (where U and A are the scalar and vectorial potentials, respectively) [43-45]. As the electrons involved in a solid structure are characterized by a small velocity with respect to the light celerity c (v/c 10 ) a 1/c-expansion of the Dirac equation may be achieved. More details are given in a paper published by one of us [46]. At the zeroth order, the Pauli equation (1927), in which the electronic spin contribution appears, is retrieved then conferring to this last one a relativistic origin. At first order the spin-orbit interaction arises and is described by the following Hamiltonian... 

Sommerfeld s formula for the energy of hydrogen-like atoms is derived under the assumptions of relativistic motion under an inverse square attractive force, subject to the above quantum postulates. It exhibits only two quantum numbers, n and kt The third, m, appears explicitly if the atom is situated in a... 

The Hamiltonian is the Legendre transform of the Lagrangean, which for non-relativistic motions is ... 

An unbiased statistical analysis of the relationship between observed red-shifts and the rate of quasar expansion, when ascribed to a light beam or other relativistic motion in the source frame of reference, leads directly to the quadratic redshift-distance relationship and predicts an eminently reasonable radius of the universe. 

Turning now to the non-relativistic motion, one expands the positive (or electronic) energy-momentum relativistic above solution in term of (v/c) yielding in the first order expansion. 

The previous discussion shows that neither the spin nor the operator K are related to relativistic effects (as is often claimed), but rather they are compatible with nonrelativistic motion (Galilei group relativity) as well as relativistic motion (Poincare group relativity). This point was also made in several of the papers by Levy-Leblond [13]. 

The Darwin correction, is a relativistic correction attributed to the electron s Zitterbewegung. It arises from the smearing of the charge of the electron due to its relativistic motion. 

The PWBA theory has the validity for highly asymmetric colhsions Z electronic states by the presence of the projectiles, disturbances to the projectile motion by the Coulomb deflection caused by the target nucleus and the relativistic motion of the target electrons are some of the corrections which have been introduced (Brandt and Lapicki 1979, 1981). 

General Equation of Motion. Neglecting relativistic effects, the rate of accumulation of mass within a Cartesian volume element dx-dy-dz must equal the sum of the rates of inflow minus outflow. This is expressed by the equation of continuity ... 

Relativistic mechanics normally deals with situations where one body is moving with respect to another one. If this relative motion is one of uniform velocity, then the subject is referred to as special relativity. Special relativity is well understood and has stood the test of experiment. If accelerations are involved, then we enter the realm of general relativity. It is fair comment to say that general relativity is still an active research field. 

To a good approximation one can assume that there are two independent groups of electrons (or channels) which carry the current, majority (or spin up) and minority (or spin down). Relativistic effects can couple the electron s spin to its motion through the lattice, but this effect is usually small for the transition metals and has not been included in the calculations shown here. 

It is easy to invent rules that conserve particle number, energy, momentum and so on, and to smooth out the apparent lack of structural symmetry (although we have cheated a little in our example of a random walk because the circular symmetry in this case is really a statistical phenomenon and not a reflection of the individual particle motion). The more interesting question is whether relativistically correct (i.e. Lorentz invariant) behavior can also be made to emerge on a Cartesian lattice. Toffoli ([toff89], [toffSOb]) showed that this is possible. 

This expression is exact within our original approximation, where we have neglected relativistic effects of the electrons and the zero-point motions of the nuclei. The physical interpretation is simple the first term represents the repulsive Coulomb potential between the nuclei, the second the kinetic energy of the electronic cloud, the third the attractive Coulomb potential between the electrons and the nuclei, and the last term the repulsive Coulomb potential between the electrons. 

In this review, we have mainly studied the correlation energy connected with the standard unrelativistic Hamiltonian (Eq. II.4). This Hamiltonian may, of course, be refined to include relativistic effects, nuclear motion, etc., which leads not only to improvements in the Hartree-Fock scheme, but also to new correlation effects. The relativistic correlation and the correlation connected with the nuclear motion are probably rather small but may one day become significant. 

Rate of change of observables, 477 Ray in Hilbert space, 427 Rayleigh quotient, 69 Reduction from functional to algebraic form, 97 Regula fold method, 80 Reifien, B., 212 Relative motion of particles, 4 Relative velocity coordinate system and gas coordinate system, 10 Relativistic invariance of quantum electrodynamics, 669 Relativistic particle relation between energy and momentum, 496 Relativistic quantum mechanics, 484 Relaxation interval, 385 method of, 62 oscillations, 383 asymptotic theory, 388 discontinuous theory, 385 Reliability, 284... 

The motion of the source must be fast (possibly relativistic). 

Particles moving at velocities approaching the speed of light are better described by relativistic mechanics. At moderate velocities, this mechanics which is based on the postulate that the velocity of light, c cannot be exceeded, reduces to the more familiar system of Newtonian mechanics. In the same way one expects the mechanics that describes the motion of sub-atomic particles reduces to the familiar form of mechanics for more massive particles. 

Spin-orbit coupling problems are of a genuine quantum nature since a priori spin is a quantity that only occurs in quantum mechanics. However, already Thomas (Thomas, 1927) had introduced a classical model for spin precession. Later, Rubinow and Keller (Rubinow and Keller, 1963) derived the Thomas precession from a WKB-like approach to the Dirac equation. They found that although the spin motion only occurs in the first semiclassical correction to the relativistic classical electron motion, it can be expressed in merely classical terms. 

As is well known (Chirikov, 1979 Izrailev, 1990), the phase-space evolution of the norelativistic classical kicked rotor is described by nonrelativistic standard map. The analysis of this map shows that the motion of the nonrelativistic kicked rotor is accompanied by unlimited diffusion in the energy and momentum. However, this diffusion is suppressed in the quantum case (Casati et.al., 1979 Izrailev, 1990). Such a suppression of diffusive growth of the energy can be observed when one considers the (classical) relativistic extention of the classical standard map (Nomura et.al., 1992) which was obtained recently by considering the motion of the relativistic electron in the field of an electrostatic wave packet. The relativistic generalization of the standard map is obtained recently (Nomura et.al., 1992)... 

We would like to point out some steps of derivation of the nonrelativistic limit Hamiltonians by means of the Foldy-Wouthuyisen transformation (Bjorken and Drell, 1964). The method is based on the transformation of a relativistic equation of motion to the Schrodinger equation form. 

---