Momentum diffusion distribution

The stationary solution of the Fokker-Planck equation, which includes the friction force F=— /3v, and the momentum diffusion coefficient (eqn 5.22), is a 3D Gaussian distribution... 

The multi-time-scale expansion of (51) is based on the physical time-scale separation between colUsions (t h), sound propagation (t h/e), and momentum diffusion (t h/e ). Equations (56)-(58) make the implicit assumption that these three relaxations can be considered separately, which allows the collision operator at order -h 1 to be calculated from the distribution functions at order k. In essence, the collision dynamics at order fe+ 1 is slaved to the lower-order distributions. The zeroth-order collision operator must be a function of only. 

Based on the above-mentioned assumptions, the mass, momentum and energy balance equations for the gas and the dispersed phases in two-dimensional, two-phase flow were developed [14], In order to solve the mass, momentum and energy balance equations, several complimentary equations, definitions and empirical correlations were required. These were presented by [14], In order to obtain the water vapor distribution the gas phase the water vapor diffusion equation was added. During the second drying period, the model assumed that the particle consists of a dry crust surrounding a wet core. Hence, the particle is characterized by two temperatures i.e., the particle s crust and core temperatures. Furthermore, it was assumed that the heat transfer from the particle s cmst to the gas phase is equal to that transferred from the wet core to the gas phase i.e., heat and mass cannot be accumulated in the particle cmst, since all the heat and the mass is transferred by diffusion through the cmst from the wet core to the surrounding gas. Based on this assumption, additional heat balance equation was written. 

The well-known Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution for the velocity or momentum associated with the translational motion of a molecule is valid not only for free molecules but also for interacting molecules in a liquid phase (see Appendix A.2.1). The average kinetic energy of a molecule at temperature T is, accordingly, (3/2)ksT. For the molecules to react in a bimolecular reaction they should be brought into contact with each other. This happens by diffusion when the reactants are dispersed in a solution, which is a quite different process from the one in the gas phase. For fast reactions, the diffusion rate of reactant molecules may even be the limiting factor in the rate of reaction. 

Numerous calculations [61] of the electronic tensors with different basis sets have shown, on the other hand, that the computed size of the couplet depends critically on the presence or absence of diffuse basis functions with valence angular momentum numbers. It is the diffuse part of the electron distribution of a molecule which is primarily affected by nonspecific interactions in the condensed phase. This suggests that the absence of a sizable couplet in the condensed phase, in substance as well as in trideuterioacetonitrile, is the result of the change of the electron distribution of (+)-(P)-1,4-dimethylenespiropentane by nonspecific interactions. 

Surface tractions or contact forces produce a stress field in the fluid element characterized by a stress tensor T. Its negative is interpreted as the diffusive flux of momentum, and x x (—T) is the diffusive flux of angular momentum or torque distribution. If stresses and torques are presumed to be in local equilibrium, the tensor T is easily shown to be symmetric. 

For a gas mixture at rest, the velocity distribution function is given by the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function obtained from an equilibrium statistical mechanism. For nonequilibrium systems in the vicinity of equilibrium, the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function is multiplied by a correction factor, and the transport equations are represented as a linear function of forces, such as the concentration, velocity, and temperature gradients. Transport equations yield the flows representing the molecular transport of momentum, energy, and mass with the transport coefficients of the kinematic viscosity, v, the thermal diffirsivity, a, and Fick s diffusivity, Dip respectively. 

From these time-scales, it may be assumed in most circumstances that the free electrons have a Maxwellian distribution and that the dominant populations of impurities in the plasma are those of the ground and metastable states of the various ions. The dominant populations evolve on time-scales of the order of plasma diffusion time-scales and so should be modeled dynamically, that is in the particle number continuity equations, along with the momentum and energy equations of plasma transport theory. The excited populations of impurities on the other hand may be assumed relaxed with respect to the instantaneous dominant populations, that is they are in a quasi-equilibrium. The quasi-equilibrium is determined by local conditions of electron temperature and electron density. So, the atomic modeling may be partially de-coupled from the impurity transport problem into local calculations which provide quasi-equilibrium excited ion populations and effective emission coefficients (PEC coefficients) and then effective source coefficients (GCR coefficients) for dominant populations which must be entered into the transport equations. The solution of the transport equations establishes the spatial and temporal behaviour of the dominant populations which may then be re-associated with the local emissivity calculations, for matching to and analysis of observations. 

Mitroy et al. (1984) carried out an extensive configuration-interaction calculation of the structure amplitude (q/ 0) for correlated target and ion states. The long-dashed curve in fig. 11.7(a) shows their momentum distribution multiplied by 2. They found that the dominant contribution came from the pseudo-orbital 3d, calculated by the natural-orbital transformation. Pseudo-orbitals are localised to the same part of space as the occupied 3s and 3p Hartree—Fock orbitals and therefore contribute to the cross section at much higher momenta than the diffuse Hartree—Fock 3d and 4d orbitals. The measurements show that the 4d orbital has a larger weight than is calculated by Mitroy et al, who overestimate the 3d component. 

---