Molecules structure, QSAR modeling properties

In Table 5.1, we present a list of the main physicochemical and structural properties associated with the descriptors included in the 2D QSAR models discussed above. Of course, we did some generalizations in an attempt to refer different parameters and descriptors to the same property, but the effort was devoted at identifying the smallest number of significant features positively or negatively correlated to the hERG blockade by small molecules. Examining the properties... 

Poor intestinal absorption of a potential drug molecule can be related to poor physicochemical properties and/or poor membrane permeation. Poor membrane permeation could be due to low paracellular or transcellular permeability or the net result of efflux from transporter proteins including MDRl (P-gp) or MRP proteins situated in the intestinal membrane. Cell lines with only one single efflux transporter are currently engineered for in vitro permeability assays to get suitable data for reliable QSAR models. In addition, efforts to gain deeper insight into P-gp and ABC on a structural basis are going on [131, 132]. 

Any QSAR method can be generally defined as an application of mathematical and statistical methods to the problem of finding empirical relationships (QSAR models) of the form ,- = k(D, D2,..., D ), where ,- are biological activities (or other properties of interest) of molecules, D, P>2,- ,Dn are calculated (or, sometimes, experimentally measured) structural properties (molecular descriptors) of compounds, and k is some empirically established mathematical transformation that should be applied to descriptors to calculate the property values for all molecules (Fig. 6.1). The goal of QSAR modeling is to establish a trend in the descriptor values, which parallels the trend in biological activity. In essence, all QSAR approaches imply, directly or indi-... 

Closely related to analytical interpretations of QSAR models is the ability to visualize the SAR trends encoded in a model. The glowing molecule representation developed by Segall et al. (14) is an example of direct visualization of a predictive model in terms of the actual chemical structure. Figure 1 shows such a representation, where the shading corresponds to the influence of that sub-structural feature on the predicted property. This type of visualization allows the user to directly understand how structural modifications at specific points will affect the property or activity being optimized. 

Classical Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Techniques The early QSAR models for calcium channel ligands were based on classical Hansch analysis and elucidated the structural requirements for the binding of molecules to their receptors [111-115], It was found that various steric (Bl, L), electronic (a), and hydrophobic (n) parameters or their combination correlated well with the potency of various DHPs [111]. QSAR analysis of another set of DHPs revealed good correlations between electronic properties (F-constants) of the phenyl ring substituents and binding affinities or functional potency [112] lipophilicity as well as ortho- and meta-substituents inductivity... 

For deriving a QSAR model, three different types of elements are required (Figure 23.1). First, a measured endpoint for a set of molecules has to be available. Second, chemicals must be described by means of their physicochemical properties or structurally derived parameters. Last, a statistical method must be used for linking the first two elements. These three critical ingredients of the general methodology in the derivation of a QSAR model are briefly discussed in the next sections. 

One of the goals of QSAR studies is to help explain retrospectively the response or property of a molecule with a rationale based on molecular structure. A second major goal and challenge of QSAR or QSPR studies is to develop models that are able to predict quantitatively the property of new molecules either real or virtual compounds. Thus, successful predictive QSAR models can have a tremendous impact in the design of new molecules. Furthermore, predictive models are useful to perform in silico predictions of the properties of new structures. In virtual screening, those molecules that are predicted to have the desired property according to the QSAR model are selected as best candidates. Reviews, examples, caveats, and modified versions of QSAR are described elsewhere (Kubinyi, 1997a,b Wermuth, 2008). Some recent examples reported in the food chemistry field are summarized in Table 2.4. 

QSARs are based on the assumption that the structure of a molecule (for example, its geometric, steric, and electronic properties) must contain features responsible for its physical, chemical, and biological properties and on the ability to capture these features into one or more numerical descriptors. By QSAR models, the biological activity (or property, reactivity, etc.) of a new designed or untested chemical can be inferred from the molecular structure of similar compounds whose activities (properties, reactivities, etc.) have already been assessed. 

The software now uses structurally intrinsic parameters for only one QSAR model (LSER) and the results are used to predict one property (acute toxicity) to four aquatic species by one mechanism (nonreactive, non-polar narcosis) however, we intend to continue to refine our equations as databases grow, incorporate other models, predict other properties, and include other organisms. We will attempt to differentiate between modes of toxic action and improve our estimates accordingly. For the widely divergent classes of chemicals and types of environmental behavior, no one model will best describe every situation and no one species is the optimal organism to monitor. As the software evolves, the expert system should choose the best model based on the contaminant, the species, and the property to be predicted (e.g., toxicity or bioaccumulation). In addition, we envision an interactive screen system for data entry that will bypass the SMILES notation and allow the user to describe the molecule by posing a series of questions about the compound s backbone and functional groups. The responses will translate directly into values of LSER variables. 

---