Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Our Empirical Findings

To determine the behavior of g(q) for large q, we performed measurements of iS lq, ) of Li for 1.1 a.u. < q < 2.6 a.u. and performed for each spectrum a fit of the g(g)-modified c° to the experimental data. Figure 10 shows the result of this semi-empirical determination of g(q) together with the shape of the local-field correction factor after Farid et al. [7] calculated for different values ofz solid line (z = 0.1), dashed line (z = 0.5) and dash-dotted line (z = 0.7). One clearly sees that the curve for the surprisingly small value of z = 0.1 fits our experimental findings best. [Pg.200]

Santa-Clara and Sornette [67] argue that there are no empirical findings that would lead to a preference of a T-differential or non-differential type of RF. We show that the integrated RF dU t, T) enforces a well-defined short rate process, whereas the non-differential field dW t, T) fails. In the following, we restrict our analysis to these two t5 es of RF models, but keeping in mind that only the T-differential RF ensures a well defined short rate process. Their correlation functions fit with the requirements for a correct modeling of the forward rate curve, while the models remain tractable. [Pg.72]

The next sections present complexities of FSCN (section 3), and the classification of logistics activities (section 4). Section 5 introduces several outsourcing approaches. Case study results are presented in the section 6. In section 7 and 8, results are analyzed and theoretical and empirical insights are discussed. The paper concludes with a summary of our main findings and suggestions... [Pg.137]

Illustration 8.6 A Simple Model of Reverse Osmosis We set as our task here the replacement of the rigorous PDE model of reverse osmosis by a simple and approximate treatment, which makes use of certain empirical findings. Given the uncertainty of the parameters used in even the most rigorous models, this is no more than what good engineering sense dictates. [Pg.336]

The maximum number of tolerated usability issues derives from our empirical observations on how the user reacts when s/he discovers that a certain limitation on the implementation platform constrains him/her to use the FSM Add-on in an unnatural or elaborated way. We noticed that when the user finds out more than 5 limitations s/he starts to argue about usability even if they are only minor issues. [Pg.112]

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. We first present the game used in our research, describing its various configurations. Then we introduce the procedure adopted in our empirical study and discuss its main findings. We conclude with a brief overview of related works and some final considerations. [Pg.377]

T[i from 13c NMR spectral collapse temperatures, was first noted in ref. 16, based on published NMR data by Axelson and Mandelkem.1 We were puzzled at the timel as to why an NMR technique in the megaherz range would yield static values of T/j, but accepted it as an empirical finding. A recent paper by Axelson, Mandelkem, and coauthors has clarified this question for us even though these authors discounted our association of T// with Xg as being a fortuitous circumstance. 1 We intend to treat the new experimental results in considerable detail elsewhere at a later date. However, a brief commentary with one illustration can clarify this situation for present purposes as regards Fig. 6. [Pg.163]

Abstract. A smooth empirical potential is constructed for use in off-lattice protein folding studies. Our potential is a function of the amino acid labels and of the distances between the Ca atoms of a protein. The potential is a sum of smooth surface potential terms that model solvent interactions and of pair potentials that are functions of a distance, with a smooth cutoff at 12 Angstrom. Techniques include the use of a fully automatic and reliable estimator for smooth densities, of cluster analysis to group together amino acid pairs with similar distance distributions, and of quadratic progrmnming to find appropriate weights with which the various terms enter the total potential. For nine small test proteins, the new potential has local minima within 1.3-4.7A of the PDB geometry, with one exception that has an error of S.SA. [Pg.212]

It is our experience that to the first question, the most common student response is something akin to Because my teacher told me so . One is tempted to say that it is a pity that the scientific belief of so mat r students is sourced from an authority, rather than from empirical evidence - except that when chemists are asked question (ii), they find it not at all easy to answer. There is, after all, no single defining experiment that conclusively proves the claim, even though it was the phenomenon of Brownian motion that finally seems to have clinched the day for the atomists 150 or so years ago. Of course, from atomic forced microscopy (AFM), we see pictures of gold atoms being manipulated one by one - but the output from AFM is itself the result of application of interpretive models. [Pg.15]

To benchmark our learning methodology with alternative conventional approaches, we used the same 500 (x, y) data records and followed the usual regression analysis steps (including stepwise variable selection, examination of residuals, and variable transformations) to find an approximate empirical model, / (x), with a coefficient of determination = 0.79. This model is given by... [Pg.127]

This is a critical chapter in your study of chemistry. Our goal is to help you master the mole concept. You will learn about balancing equations and the mole/mass relationships (stoichiometry) inherent in these balanced equations. You will learn, given amounts of reactants, how to determine which one limits the amount of product formed. You will also learn how to determine the empirical and molecular formulas of compounds. All of these will depend on the mole concept. Make sure that you can use your calculator correctly. If you are unsure about setting up problems, refer back to Chapter 1 of this book and go through Section 1-4, on using the Unit Conversion Method. Review how to find atomic masses on the periodic table. Practice, Practice, Practice. [Pg.32]


See other pages where Our Empirical Findings is mentioned: [Pg.296]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.2121]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.2121]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.916]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.523]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info