Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular polar interactions

These procedures were found (Das and Tederer, 1971 Das et al., 1967) to increase the volatility of a peptide by removing some of the intramolecular and inter-molecular polar interactions that are characteristic of amino acids, peptides and proteins. The procedures have continuously been developed during more recent years, since they also form the basis of derivatisation for gas-liquid chromatographic (GTC) analysis of amino acids (Section 4.18.2) and peptides. [Pg.71]

The dipoles are shown interacting directly as would be expected. Nevertheless, it must be emphasized that behind the dipole-dipole interactions will be dispersive interactions from the random charge fluctuations that continuously take place on both molecules. In the example given above, the net molecular interaction will be a combination of both dispersive interactions from the fluctuating random charges and polar interactions from forces between the two dipoles. Examples of substances that contain permanent dipoles and can exhibit polar interactions with other molecules are alcohols, esters, ethers, amines, amides, nitriles, etc. [Pg.67]

Returning to the molecular force concept, in any particular distribution system it is rare that only one type of interaction is present and if this occurs, it will certainly be dispersive in nature. Polar interactions are always accompanied by dispersive interactions and ionic interactions will, in all probability, be accompanied by both polar and dispersive interactions. However, as shown by equation (11), it is not merely the magnitude of the interacting forces between the solute and the stationary phase that will control the extent of retention, but also the amount of stationary phase present in the system and its accessibility to the solutes. This leads to the next method of retention control, and that is the volume of stationary phase available to the solute. [Pg.33]

All of these intermolecular forces influence several properties of polymers. Dispersion forces contribute to the factors that result in increased viscosity as molecular weight increases. Crystalline domains arise in polyethylene because of dispersion forces. As you will learn later in the text, there are other things that influence both viscosity and crystallization, but intermolecular forces play an important role. In polar polymers, such as polymethylmethacrylate, polyethylene terephthalate and nylon 6, the presence of the polar groups influences crystallization. The polar groups increase the intensity of the interactions, thereby increasing the rate at which crystalline domains form and their thermal stability. Polar interactions increase the viscosity of such polymers compared to polymers of similar length and molecular weight that exhibit low levels of interaction. [Pg.76]

The general or universal effects in intermolecular interactions are determined by the electronic polarizability of solvent (refraction index n0) and the molecular polarity (which results from the reorientation of solvent dipoles in solution) described by dielectric constant z. These parameters describe collective effects in solvate s shell. In contrast, specific interactions are produced by one or few neighboring molecules, and are determined by the specific chemical properties of both the solute and the solvent. Specific effects can be due to hydrogen bonding, preferential solvation, acid-base chemistry, or charge transfer interactions. [Pg.216]

Molecular modeling studies revealed a similar binding mode for (5)-2-nitro-1 -phenylethanol in the catalytic center of ///)HNL as was determined experimentally for (5)-mandelonitrile, preserving all mechanistically important polar interactions with active-site residues. This implies that the mechanism for the cyanohydrin reaction applies to the nitroaldol reaction as well. [Pg.114]

The book covers a variety of questions related to orientational mobility of polar and nonpolar molecules in condensed phases, including orientational states and phase transitions in low-dimensional lattice systems and the theory of molecular vibrations interacting both with each other and with a solid-state heat bath. Special attention is given to simple models which permit analytical solutions and provide a qualitative insight into physical phenomena. [Pg.209]

RT "The role of polar interactions in the molecular recognition of CD40L RT with its receptor CD40." ... [Pg.34]

Five organic solvents [acetonitrile, methanol, tetrahydrofuran (THF), acetone, and dimethylformamide], which are homogeneously miscible with water, have been used as modifiers to study the relationship of the selectivity of the solvent to the molecular properties of analytes. The polar interaction... [Pg.58]

The stability of the molecular conformation of organic solids Is determined by the nature and distribution within the molecular network of both covalent crosslinks and the various non-covalent Interactions. The latter Include localized (e.g. hydrogen bonds) and non-locallzed electrostatic Interactions and the short-range non-polar Interactions between molecular units due to the ubiquitous and weak van der Waals Induction and dispersion forces (7 ). [Pg.112]

The effects of exposure of organic solids to particular solvents such as pyridine on their conformational stability can also be Interpreted In terms of the structural features discussed above. How small nucleophilic molecules disrupt Inter- and Intramolecular polar Interactions In coals thereby relaxing the structural matrix and allowing further solvent penetration has been extensively discussed by Peppas (e.g. 11,12), Larsen (1,13) and Marzec (14-16) and their colleagues. Indeed the extent to which exposure to a polar solvent such as pyridine destabilizes a material s molecular structure Is a measure of the extent to which the stability of the material depends on polar Interactions. [Pg.112]

Recently Qulnga and Larsen (19) have considered the role of non-polar Interactions In coals. In particular, they pointed out the likely Importance of London dispersion forces between planar aromatic units and that the effect of these short-range Interactions on the stability of a lattice would Increase with Increasing size of the molecular units. Thus the greater concentration and growth In average size of these units with Increasing rank for bituminous coals would lead to enhancement of the role of the London dispersion... [Pg.112]


See other pages where Molecular polar interactions is mentioned: [Pg.2056]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.917]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.65 ]




SEARCH



Molecular Interaction and Polarity Scales

Molecular interaction potential with polarization

Molecular interactions

Molecular interactive

Molecular polarity

Molecular polarization

Molecular polarized

Polar interactions

Polarization interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info