Modeling programs input

I chose to use this software for reasons that extend beyond familiarity and prejudice the programs are interactive and take simple commands as input. As such, I can include within the text of this book scripts that in a few lines show the precise steps taken to calculate each result. Readers can, of course, reproduce the calculations by using any of a number of other modeling programs, such as those listed in Appendix 1. Following the steps shown in the text, they should be able to construct input in the format recognized by the chosen program. 

Table A.l describes how data is input into the FREZCHEM model. This is specifically for version 9.2. Earlier versions have similar but fewer inputs. Pay particular attention to the units of gas concentrations. Versions of the model before 9.2 required gas concentrations in atm., while version 9.2 requires units of bars. Most of the program inputs are relatively self-explanatory (Table A.l). A few additional words are necessary to assure gas hydrates are handled correctly in the model.

We give only a short description of the three supply chain configurations and their simulation models for details we refer to Persson and Olhager (2002). At the start of our sequential bifurcation, we have three simulation models programmed in the Taylor II simulation software for discrete event simulations see Incontrol (2003). We conduct our sequential bifurcation via Microsoft Excel, using the batch run mode in Taylor II. We store input-output data in Excel worksheets. This set-up facilitates the analysis of the simulation input-output data, but it constrains the setup of the experiment. For instance, we cannot control the pseudorandom numbers in the batch mode of Taylor II. Hence, we cannot apply common pseudorandom numbers nor can we guarantee absence of overlap in the pseudorandom numbers we conjecture that the probability of overlap is negligible in practice. 

In addition, many of the variables that were up to now modeled as input variables should instead be modeled as dependent output variables. To do so, the interdependencies between the parameters must be quantified based on further literature analysis and on surveys of experts. An assistance program for the creation of simulation models will be conceptualized and implemented to support project managers in modeling new concepts of design processes. This contains both the conversion of the C3 model in an executable simulation model as well as the partial automation of test runs for the optimization of workflow management. 

There are several publicly available programs available for homology modeling that are intended to make complete models from input sequences. These are MODELLER, developed by Andrej Sali and colleagues [16, 17, 41, 195], SwissModel, developed by Manuel Peitsch and colleagues [151, 196, 197], RAMP developed by Ram Samudrala and John Moult [193,... 

In general terms, alkalinity is the Acid Neutralizing Capacity of a solution, that is, the quantity of acid required to neutralize the solution. The acidity is similarly the Base Neutralizing Capacity , the quantity of base required to neutralize the acidity of a solution. Alkalinity and acidity are determined by titrating a sample of solution with an acid (such as HC1) or a base (such as NaOH) of known concentration. However, the variety of ways in which these simple concepts can be defined and interpreted has led to much confusion. Several modeling programs now do not allow input of acidity or alkalinity, as such, partly because of this confusion. However, others do, and in any case users will still have to deal with these concepts if they appear in their analyses. 

The most widely used geochemical modeling programs consist of a computer code plus a related file of data called a database. The database contains thermodynamic and kinetic parameters. The code uses the thermodynamic and kinetic parameters in the database and concentrations or other constraints as input, and produces results that describe a geochemical model for a particular chemical system. 

These days, in the age of personal computers, data input is invariably done by typing the data onto the terminal screen. This may be while the modeling program is actually... 

In summary, a model is invariably produced with certain input from the modeler, even though the need for conceptualization on the modeler s part is not always apparent. The modeling programs and databases have not been tested for the accuracy and completeness of their thermodynamic properties. Sometimes, running the code without worrying about the underlying conceptualization produces acceptable modeling results. Often, however, we are not that lucky, and it is the modeler s responsibility to ensure that the results are produced from an acceptable chemical model. 

Usually, alkalinity is actually the ultimate parameter that is subject to a procedure of genuinely chemical titration, in this regard as a proxy parameter for carbonate. A new spectropho-tometric method for the determination of alkalinity was proposed by Sarazin et al. (1999). Mostly, alkalinity will be, for reasons of simplification, set equal to the total carbonate concentration, although a number of other substances in pore water will contribute to the titration of alkalinity as well. Most geochemical model programs (cf Chap. 15) foresee the input of titrated alkalinity as an alternative to the input of carbonate. The model program will than calculate the proportion allo-catable to the different carbonate species. 

Our modeling program consists of three main blocks input data for basin structure and evolution, initial parameters for basin modeling, and numerical simulation... 

Fig. 56. Ingredients of the 3D homology-modelling program. The experimental dipolar couplings of the amides as well as the information about the secondary structure as derived from the chemical-shift analysis is used as experimental input. The pdb data bank is used in addition. Alignment of sec-ondary-stmcture elements while optimizing the fit of the dipolar couphngs yields the scoring function for the homology fitting.

In addition, these programs can serve as the central link in a chemical information workstation which allows researchers to input a structure and manipulate the structure to gather information, prepare a camera-ready copy, create a personal file, and a host of other activities. Researchers will be able to upload structures to online and on-site systems and capture retrieved answers, and move relevant compounds into modelling programs, and other applications. Several of the programs included in this paper have this type of utility now and more interfacing of programs can be expected. 

---