Mobile phases equivalent solvent

When I make a diagram of column polarities versus solvent polarities, I tend to think of the columns as being a continuous series of increasing polarity from Cis to silica C18, phenyl, C8, cyano, C3, diol, amino, and silica (Fig. 5.5). Under that, I have their solvents in opposite order of polarity from hexane under Ci8 to water under silica hexane, benzene, methylene chloride, chloroform, THF, acetonitrile, i-PrOH, MeOH, and water. The cyano column and THF are about equivalent polarity. In setting up a separation system, we cross over nonpolar columns require polar mobile phase and vice versa to achieve a polarity difference. 

High performance liquid chromatography techniques may be successfiilly applied to analyze phthalate esters. A 15 or 25 cm column filled with 5 or 10 pm silica-based packings is suitable. Short columns (3.3 cm x 4.6 mm), commonly called 3x3 columns, offer sufficient efficiency and reduce analysis time and solvent consumption Phthalate esters resolve rapidly on a 3 x 3 Supelcosil LC-8 column (3 pm packing) at 35°C and detected by a UV detector at 254 nm. Acetonitrile-water is used as mobile phase (flow rate 2 ml/min injection volume 1 mL). Other equivalent columns under optimized conditions may be used. 

The effect of the log Q term on LSC retention can be expressed as an equivalent change in the solvent strength of the mobile phase, from the value e° = EmJAm defined previously [Eqs. (7) and (8)] to an apparent value e given by ... 

The reduced mobile phase volumetric flow rate in miniaturised columns means that far less solvent is used. A typical flow rate for a 4.6 mm i.d column would be 1 ml/min. The relationship between column diameter and flow rate is proportional to the square of the column diameter, therefore, the equivalent flow rate in a 1 mm column would be approximately 0.05 ml/min. The cost of the purcha.se and disposal of the solvents used is greatly reduced and therefore the technique is also more environmentally friendly . 

Two models have been proposed to describe the process of retention in liquid chromatography (Figure 3.3), the solvent-interaction model (Scott and Kucera, 1979) and the solvent-competition model (Snyder, 1968 and 1983). Both these models assume the existence of a monolayer or multiple layers of strong mobile-phase molecules adsorbed onto the surface of the stationary phase. In the solvent-partition model the analyte is partitioned between the mobile phase and the layer of solvent adsorbed onto the stationary-phase surface. In the solvent-competition model, the analyte competes with the strong mobile-phase molecules for active sites on the stationary phase. The two models are essentially equivalent because both assume that interactions between the analyte and the stationary phase remain constant and that retention is determined by the composition of the mobile phase. Furthermore, elutropic series, which rank solvents and mobile-phase modifiers according to their affinities for stationary phases (e.g. Table 3.1), have been developed on the basis of experimental observations, which cannot distinguish the two models of retention. 

The retention mechanism in the normal phase is often referred to as adsorption chromatography. It is described as the competition between analyte molecules and mobile-phase molecules on the surface of the stationary phase. It is assumed that the adsorbing analyte displaces an approximate equivalent amount of the adsorbed solvent molecules from the monolayer on the surface of the packing throughout the retention process [18]. The solvent molecules that cover the surface of the adsorbent may or may not interact with the adsorption sites, depending on the properties of the solvent. This retention model, proposed by Snyder, was originally used to describe retention with silica and alumnina adsorbents, but several other studies have shown that this model may also be used for polar bonded phases, such as diol, cyano, and amino bonded silica [10,19]. 

Recently a new type of column has appeared. Named monolithic It Is packed with a porous silica gel which unites to form a single entity (Figure 3.8). This material, more permeable to solvents than traditional bead type stationary phases, conserves a high efficiency even for rapid flow rates of the mobile phase. These columns, now fully reproducible, have equivalent performances to packed columns. 

---