Mixtures, gases, ideal nonideal

The thermodynamic development above has been strictly limited to the case of ideal gases and mixtures of ideal gases. As pressure increases, corrections for vapor nonideality become increasingly important. They cannot be neglected at elevated pressures (particularly in the critical region). Similar corrections are necessary in the condensed phase for solutions which show marked departures from Raoult s or Henry s laws which are the common ideal reference solutions of choice. For nonideal solutions, in both gas and condensed phases, there is no longer any direct... 

The properties of mixtures of ideal gases and of ideal solutions depend solely on the properties of the pure constituent species, and are calculated from them by simple equations, as illustrated in Chap. 10. Although these models approximate the behavior of certain fluid mixtures, they do not adequately represent the -behavior of most solutions of interest to chemical engineers, and Raoult s law is not in general a realistic relation for vapor/liquid equilibrium. However, these models of ideal behavior—the ideal gas, the ideal solution, and Raoult s law— provide convenient references to which the behavior of nonideal solutions may be compared. 

As in the case of a one-component system, ideal-gas (IG) mixtures also enjoy having a simple and solvable molecular theory, in the sense that one can calculate all the thermodynamic properties of the system from molecular properties of single molecules. We also have a truly molecular theory of mixtures of slightly nonideal gases, in which case one needs in addition to molecular properties of single molecules, also interactions between two or more molecules. 

Nonideal solution effects can be incorporated into /f-value formulations in two different ways. Chapter 4 described the use of the fugacity coefficient, in conjunction with an equation of state and adequate mixing rules. This is the method most frequently used for handling nonidealities in the vapor phase. However, tv reflects the combined effects of a nonideal gas and a nonideal gas solution. At low pressures, both effects are negligible. At moderate pressures, a vapor solution may still be ideal even though the gas mixture does not follow the ideal gas law. Nonidealities in the liquid phase, however, can be severe even at low pressures. In Section 4.5, il was used to express liquid-phase nonidealities for nonpolar species. When polar species are present, mixing rules can be modified to include binary interaction parameters as in (4-113). 

In low-pressure gaseous mixtures and ideal liquid mixtures, a has been found to be small. On the other hand, in nonideal liquid mixtures, 3c may be large it becomes very large in the near-critical region for both near-critical gas and liquid phases. At the critical point, however, it has a limiting value. In this respect, a and the molecular diffusion coefficient, D, have opposite trends. Molecular diffusion is pronounced for low pressure gaseous mixtures and becomes small as the critical region is approached. 

At pressures to a few bars, the vapor phase is at a relatively low density, i.e., on the average, the molecules interact with one another less strongly than do the molecules in the much denser liquid phase. It is therefore a common simplification to assume that all the nonideality in vapor-liquid systems exist in the liquid phase and that the vapor phase can be treated as an ideal gas. This leads to the simple result that the fugacity of component i is given by its partial pressure, i.e. the product of y, the mole fraction of i in the vapor, and P, the total pressure. A somewhat less restrictive simplification is the Lewis fugacity rule which sets the fugacity of i in the vapor mixture proportional to its mole fraction in the vapor phase the constant of proportionality is the fugacity of pure i vapor at the temperature and pressure of the mixture. These simplifications are attractive because they make the calculation of vapor-liquid equilibria much easier the K factors = i i ... 

For gas-phase reactions, the molar density is more useful than the mass density. Determining the equation of state for a nonideal gas mixture can be a difficult problem in thermod5mamics. For illustrative purposes and for a great many industrial problems, the ideal gas law is sufficient. Here it is given in a form suitable for flow reactors ... 

However, two types of systems are sufficienfry important that we can use them almost exclusively (1) liquid aqueous solutions and (2) ideal gas mixtures at atmospheric pressure, hr aqueous solutions we assume that the density is 1 gtcvc , the specific heat is 1 cal/g K, and at any solute concentration, pressure, or temperature there are -55 moles/hter of water, hr gases at one atmosphere and near room temperature we assume that the heat capacity per mole is R, the density is 1/22.4 moles/hter, and aU components obey the ideal gas equation of state. Organic hquid solutions have constant properties within 20%, and nonideal gas solutions seldom have deviations larger than these. 

In this section we discuss the ideal gas equation of state and show how it is applied to systems containing single gaseous substances and mixtures of gases. Section 5,3 outlines methods used for a single nonideal gas (by definition, a gas for which the ideal gas equation of state does not work well) and for mixtures of nonideal gases. 

Equation 5.2-7 is often used as the definition of the partial pressure. For an ideal gas mixture, the definition given and Equation 5.2-7 are equivalent for a nonideal gas the concept of partial pressure has little utility. 

The volume percent of a component in an ideal gas mixture (%v/v) is the same as the mole percent of that component. If the gas mixture is nonideal, the volume percent has no useful meaning. 

The Kirkwood—Buff formalism was used to derive an expression for the composition dependence of the Henry s constant in a binary solvent. A binary mixed solvent can be considered as composed of two solvents, or one solvent and a solute, such as a salt, polymer, or protein. The following simple expression for the Henry s constant in a binary solvent (H2t) was obtained when the binary solvent was assumed ideal In = [In f2,i(ln V — In V ) + In i 2,3(ln Vj — In V)]/ (In — In V ). In this expression, i 2,i and i 2,3 are the Henry s constants for the pure single solvents 1 and 3, respectively V is the molar volume of the ideal binary solvent 1—3 and and Vs are the molar volumes of the pure individual solvents 1 and 3. The comparison with experimental data for aqueous binary solvents demonstrated that the derived expression provides the best predictions among the known equations. Even though the aqueous solvents are nonideal, their degree of nonideality is much smaller than those of the solute gas in each of the constituents. For this reason, the ideality assumption for the binary solvent constitutes a most reasonable approximation even for nonideal mixtures. 

As already mentioned, the Krichevsky equation (eq 1) is valid when the binary mixtures 1—2 and 2—3 (gas solute/pure solvents) and the ternary mixture 1—2—3 are ideal. However, these conditions are often far from reality. Let us consider, for example, the solubility of a hydrocarbon in a water—alcohol solvent (for instance, water—methanol, water—ethanol, etc.). The activity coefficient of propane in water at infinite dilution is 4 X 10 , whereas the activity coefficients of alcohols and water in aqueous solutions of simple alcohols seldom exceed 10. It is therefore clear that the main contribution to the nonideality of the ternary gas-binary solvent mixture comes from the nonidealities of the gas solute in the individual solvents, which are neglected in the Krichevsky equation. 

In this paper, the Kirkwood—Buff formalism was used to relate the Henry s constant for a binary solvent mixture to the binary data and the composition of the solvent. A general equation describing the above dependence was obtained, which can be solved (analytically or numerically) if the composition dependence of the molar volume and the activity coefficients in the gas-free mixed solvent are known. A simple expression was obtained when the mixture of solvents was considered to be ideal. In this case, the Henr/s constant for a binary solvent mixture could be expressed in terms of the Henry s constants for the individual solvents and the molar volumes of the individual solvents. The agreement with experiment for aqueous solvents is better than that provided by any other expression available, including an empirical one involving three adjustable parameters. Even though the aqueous solvents considered are nonideal, their degrees of nonideality are much lower than those of the solute gas in each of the constituent solvents. For this reason, the assumption that the binary solvent behaves as an ideal mixture constitutes a reasonable approximation. 

In a previous paper regarding the gas solubility in mixtures of two nonelectrolytes, the ideality approximation for the binary solvent was employed to obtain an expression for the gas solubility. The ideality of the mixed solvents constituted a good approximation because usually the nonideality of the mixture of two nonelectrolytes is much lower than those between each of them and the gas. A similar assumption can be made for dilute aqueous salt solutions. Indeed, the data regarding the activity coefficient of water (yw) in dilute aqueous solutions of sodium chloride indicate that 1(9 In 7w/9xw)p,tI 0.01 for a molality of sodium chloride smaller than 0.8. Considering, in addition, that (Ai2 - A2s)4=o is independent of composition, eq 13 becomes... 

The present paper is concerned with mixtures composed of a highly nonideal solute and a multicomponent ideal solvent. A model-free methodology, based on the Kirkwood—Buff (KB) theory of solutions, was employed. The quaternary mixture was considered as an example, and the full set of expressions for the derivatives of the chemical potentials with respect to the number of particles, the partial molar volumes, and the isothermal compressibility were derived on the basis of the KB theory of solutions. Further, the expressions for the derivatives of the activity coefficients were applied to quaternary mixtures composed of a solute and an ideal ternary solvent. It was shown that the activity coefBcient of a solute at infinite dilution in an ideal ternary solvent can be predicted in terms of the activity coefBcients of the solute at infinite dilution in subsystems (solute + the individual three solvents, or solute + two binaries among the solvent species). The methodology could be extended to a system formed of a solute + a multicomponent ideal mixed solvent. The obtained equations were used to predict the gas solubilities and the solubilities of crystalline nonelectrolytes in multicomponent ideal mixed solvents. Good agreement between the predicted and experimental solubilities was obtained. 

In order to indicate the fact that the value of G as given by equation (42.1) applies to the constituent 2, i.e., the solute, a subscript 2 is sometimes included. However, this is usually omitted, for in the great majority of cases it is understood that the apparent molar property refers to the solute. It i.s seen from equation (42.1) that o is the apparent contribution of 1 mole of the component 2 to the property G of the mixture. If the particular property were strictly additive for the two components, e.g., volume and heat content for ideal gas and liquid solutions, the value of 4>q would be equal to the actual molar contribution, and hence also to the partial molar value. For nonideal systems, however, the quantities are all different. 

The interaction phenomena discussed earlier for the ideal gas case will also be possible for nonideal fluid mixtures, for which [T] contribute to the matrix [A ] by means of its separate influence on [A ], the zero flux matrix, and [3], the correction factor matrix. 

Gas mixture adsorption is a field that is still waiting for a better theory to explain the experimental data. The Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory cannot explain aU the facts and needs to be replaced by a new model that includes nonideal effects, and adsorbent surface heterogeneity in particular. This field is acquiring increasing relevance because of its technological impHcations. 

From Eq. (1-9) it is clear that K = Kp for an ideal-gas reaction mixture. For nonideal systems Eq. (1-14) may still be employed to calculate Kp from measured equilibrium compositions (Ky). However, then no equal To X detennined Tfbm Iherin for example, from Eq. (1-4). 

The partial pressure of species i in a gas mixture, denoted by P , is defined for both ideal and nonideal gas mixtures to be the product of the mole fraction of species i and total pressure P, that is,... 

---