Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mixing samplers

Disadvantages include the tendency to lose finer-grained sediment particles as water flows out of the sampler and the loss of spatial information, both laterally and with depth, due to mixing of the sample. [Pg.197]

Hydrocarbons (mixed C5-C,q) Lab method using porous polymer diffusive samplers, thermal desorption and gas chromatography 66... [Pg.361]

Toluene in air (charcoal diffusive samplers, solvent desorption and gas chromatography). Mixed hydrocarbons (C5 to CIO) in air. [Pg.378]

Soil samples were collected along a traverse over the Honerat kimberlite and extended off the kimberlite approximately 75 m SE and 225 m NW from the pipe s centre (Fig. 1). Although it is common practice to collect samples from upper B-horizon soil (Levinson 1980 Bajc 1998 Mann et al. 2005) our samples were collected from C-horizon soil because GAGI samplers were placed at a depth of 60 cm (well below the B horizon). Within 8 hours of sampling, a portion of each soil sample was mixed with Milli-Q water (1 1) to create a slurry. The values of pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) were determined in each slurry. Ammonia acetate leach of the soil samples were performed at Acme Analytical Laboratories, Vancouver, where 20 ml of ammonium acetate was mixed with 1 g soil sample and elements were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. The GAGI samplers installed at Unknown were placed in piezometers and submerged in water at a depth of approximately 1 m below ground surface. [Pg.34]

Each grid area is typically sampled by taking three to four cores such as would be obtained using the sampler shown in Figure 7.3. The cores are combined and mixed to obtain the final sample for analysis. [Pg.161]

In Fig. 1.1 (d) the hydrodynamic behaviour is simplified in order to explain the mixing process. Let us assume that there is no axial dispersion and that radial dispersion is complete when the sampler reaches the detector. The volume of the sample zone is thus 200pl after the merging point (lOOpl sample+lOOpl-reagent as flow rates are equal). The total flow rate is 2.0ml min-1. Simple mathematics then gives a residence time of 6s for the sample in the detector flow cell. In reality, response curves reflect... [Pg.33]

Marsh et al. [47] have described an apparatus based on an autoanalyser system for the automatic preparation of soil extracts for mineral nitrogen determination. It consists of a reagent adder, which adds the correct volume of extractant for an approximately weighed amount of soil, and a sample preparation unit, which mixes, filters, dilutes and loads samples on to an autoanalyser sampler. A labour saving of 60% is achieved in this method compared to manual method. Examples are given of the determination of nitrate plus nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen. [Pg.327]

This configuration has the important added benefit of ensuring significantly improved mixing of the reactor contents. This feature cannot be over-emphasized. While the upward flow sampler originally was designed... [Pg.63]

These factors combine to make impactors less precise and accurate than filters. Very few comparisons have been made between sizing impactors and those that have provided mixed results. The 1977 Environmental Protection Agency-Department of Energy Sampler Intercomparison included the Multi-Day Sampler, which performed well ( 15%) for fine aerosols such as sulfur, lead, and zinc (15). The 1986 Carbonaceous Species tests at Glendora, California, included the DRUM sampler. It performed well for sulfur ( 18%), as compared to the fine filter sampler (PM-2.5), but no other sizing impactor was available for comparison and no element other than sulfur was reported. DRUM versus filter comparisons were reported as part of the Southern California Air Quality Study of 1987 (2). Again, no other impactor was available for comparison, and the comparisons with filters were only fair (r2 0.7 r, linear correlation coefficient). [Pg.230]

With very viscous or semi-solid liquids such as syrups, molasses and massecuite, the sample is taken by means of a cylindrical metal sampler in such a way that proportionate amounts are taken at different depths. With very dense products which may have crystallised sugar at the bottom, it is especially necessary to reach with the sampler the very bottom of the vessel. Several samples are withdrawn and mixed and the sample or samples for analysis (about 200 grams each) then stored in glass bottles with ground stoppers. [Pg.123]

Boyer and Probecker [191] determined organic solvents in several pharmaceutical forms using a Perkin-Elmer HS-6 headspace sampler. Typically, the samples were heated at 90°C for 10 min to establish equilibrium. Head-space samples were injected onto a Chromosorb 102 column. Ten injections of a mixed ethanol-acetone standard using methanol as the internal standard gave better precision than manual injections as measured by the relative standard deviation 1.63% and 2.48% for ethanol and acetone, respectively, using the sampler as compared to 4.77% and 3.93% by manual injection, respectively. Methods were reported for acetone and ethanol in dry forms such as tablets and microgranules, ethanol of crystallization in raw materials, and ethanol in syrups. Denaturants such as n-butanol and isopropanol in ethyl alcohol were determined using ethyl acetate as the internal standard. [Pg.317]

Brouwer, D.H., Ravensberg, J.C., De Kort, W.L.A.M., Van Hemmen, J.J. (1994) A personal sampler for inhalable mixed-phase aerosols modification to an existing sample and validation test with three pesticides. Chemosphere 28, 1135-1146. [Pg.807]

A final example of totally automated HPLC (although it isn t for pesticides) will demonstrate how many different unit operations can be done in a single system to take the tedium out of repetitive analyses. The drug analyzer depicted in Figure 14 was designed to determine therapeutic levels of theophylline in human serum (8). The sampler (in the center) aspirates 50 uL of serum into the analytical cartridge, then to the EDM, and finally to the LC module. The following series of operations takes place at the rate of 20 samples per hour without operator intervention unmeasured, untreated sample is aspirated, diluted with buffer, and mixed with an internal standard the system then precipitates the protein, removes the particulates, extracts the analyte (and internal standard) into... [Pg.25]


See other pages where Mixing samplers is mentioned: [Pg.394]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.1759]    [Pg.914]    [Pg.984]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.80]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.213 , Pg.214 ]




SEARCH



Deepwater Sampler for Trace Elements (Allowing Air to Mix with the Sample)

© 2024 chempedia.info