Minimum-phase system

The important point is that the phase lag of the dead time function increases without bound with respect to frequency. This is what is called a nonminimum phase system, as opposed to the first and second transfer functions which are minimum phase systems. Formally, a minimum phase system is one which has no dead time and has neither poles nor zeros in the RHP. (See Review Problems.)... 

Proposition 3. The AD model (2) is a minimum-phase system under NOC. 

Proposition 4. Since the AD model (2) is a minimum-phase system and has a well-defined relative degree r under NOC. Then, the following input-output linearizing controller will make converge exponentially the total concentration of organic substrate St to a desired value for all t > 0... 

A linear system is referred to as minimum phase if all the zeros of its transfer function lie in the left-hand plane else, the system is non-minimum phase. Naturally, the inverse of the transfer function of a non-minimum phase system will be unstable. In the case of nonlinear systems, the concept of transfer function zeros is replaced by the zero dynamics (Isidori 1995) a nonlinear system is minimum phase if its zero dynamics are stable. 

Although it is often possible to predict the effect of the solvent on retention, due to the unique interactive character of both the solvents and the enantiomers, it is virtually impossible to predict the subtle differences that control the separation ratio from present knowledge. Nevertheless, some accurate retention data, taken at different solvent compositions, can allow the retention and separation ratios to be calculated over a wide range of concentrations using the procedure outlined above. From such data the phase system and the column can be optimized to provide the separation in the minimum time, a subject that will be discussed later in the treatment of chromatography theory. 

Laboratory economy will also require the maximum sample throughput from the equipment and, thus, the second criterion will require the analysis to be completed in the minimum time. It should be pointed out,that just a rapid separation is not the criterion. The separation must be achieved in the minimum time. In practice, the column must be designed so that, when employed with the chosen phase system and the specific apparatus, no other column will separate the mixture in less time. 

The choice of variables remaining with the operator, as stated before, is restricted and is usually confined to the selection of the phase system. Preliminary experiments must be carried out to identify the best phase system to be used for the particular analysis under consideration. The best phase system will be that which provides the greatest separation ratio for the critical pair of solutes and, at the same time, ensures a minimum value for the capacity factor of the last eluted solute. Unfortunately, at this time, theories that predict the optimum solvent system that will effect a particular separation are largely empirical and those that are available can be very approximate, to say the least. Nevertheless, there are commercially available experimental routines that help in the selection of the best phase system for LC analyses, the results from which can be evaluated by supporting computer software. The program may then suggest further routines based on the initial results and, by an iterative procedure, eventually provides an optimum phase system as defined by the computer software. 

The impact of the value of (k 2) is obviously linear, but controls the overall analysis time. It emphasizes the importance of carefully selecting the phase system not only to make the value of (a) as large as possible but also to keep (k 2) to a minimum. 

It should be noted that at a flow rate of 2 ml/min., the mobile phase velocity will be well above that of the optimum and so the maximum efficiency will not be realized. Generally, when there are more theoretical plates available than required, the flow rate is increased until the separation required is just realized. This procedure trades efficiency for time and allows the separation to be achieved in the minimum time given the column and phase system that has been chosen. It must be emphasized that the minimum analysis time can... 

In the case on the left, a composition exists which in which a minimum melting point exists. Again, A and B form a which partially melts to form a + L. However, two forms of a edso exist, a compositional area known as a "miscibility gap", i.e.- " ai and aa". But at higher temperatures, both of these melt into the single phase, a. Finally, we obtain the melt plus a. Note that at about 80% ttj-20% Uj, a melting point minimum is seen where it melts directly instead of forming the two-phase system, a -i- L. 

In terms of the two-phase system which comprises dispersions of solids in liquids, the minimum energy requirement is met if the total interfacial energy of the system has been minimized. If this requirement has been met, chemically, the fine state of subdivision is the most stable state, and the dispersion will thus avoid changing physically with time, except for the tendency to settle manifest by all dispersions whose phases have different densities. A suspension can be stable and yet undergo sedimentation, if a true equilibrium exists at the solid-liquid interface. If sedimentation were to be cited as evidence of instability, no dispersion would fit the requirements except by accident—e.g., if densities of the phases were identical, or if the dispersed particles were sufficiently small to be buoyed up by Brownian movement. 

Polymerization of butyl acrylate was also studied by us in ethyl acetate/water two phase systems (3) using potassium persulfate/quaternary ammonium salts as the initiator system. Under these conditions (a minimum amount of water was used to dissolve the persulfate), it was found that symmetrical quat salts were more efficient than surfactant type quat salts. Also, the more lipophilic quat salts were more efficient. These results prompted us to propose formation of an organic-soluble quaternary ammonium persulfate via typical phase transfer processes. 

S. Monaco and D. Normand-Cyrot. Minimum phase nonlinear discrete-time systems and feedback stabilization. In IEEE Conf. Decision and Control (CDC), pages 979-986, Los Angeles, USA, 2002. 

F is at most two because the minimum value for p is one. Thus, the temperature and pressure can be varied independently for a one-component, one-phase system and the system can be represented as an area on a temperature versus pressure diagram. 

Essentially aggregative fluidization is a two-phase system there is a dense phase (sometimes reterred to as the emulsion phase), which is continuous, and a discontinuous phase called the lean or bubble phase. The simplitied assumption that all the gas over and above that required tor minimum fluidization flows up through the bed in the form ot bubbles is known as the two-phase theory. It the total volumetric flow ot gas is Q then... 

Equation (13) shows that the minimum value of (H) is solely dependant on the column radius (r) and the thermodynamic properties of the solute/phase system. As opposed to the optimum velocity, the minimum value of (H) is not dependent on the solute diffusivtty. 

Employing the conditions defined in the three data bases and the appropriate equations derived from the Plate and Rate Theories the physical properties of the column and column packing can be determined and the correct operating conditions identified. The precise column length and particle diameter that will achieve the necessary resolution and provide the analysis in the minimum time can be calculated. It should again be emphasized that, the specifications will be such, that for the specific separation carried out, on the phase system selected and the equipment available, the minimum analysis time will be absolute No other column is possible that will allow the analysis to be carried out in less time. 

It is seen from figure (8) there is no true optimum value for (k) that will produce a minimum analysis time, but the shortest times will occur when the critical pair are close to the last eluted solutes of the mixture. This situation will be rarely possible in practice. However, it is also seen from the curves in figure (8), that if the phase system is adjusted such that the value for (k ) is 2.5 or greater, then the (k ) value will not greatly effect the analysis time. This is because the curves are very flat subsequent to a (k )... 

A necessary preface to a description of the procedure is that the solvent and the precipitant must be purified to exhaustion by contact with successive specimens of the acid to be purified. The acid A is dissolved in the minimum amount of solvent S. The precipitant P is then added under isothermal conditions to the solution until roughly one half to three quarters of A has been precipitated. At this stage there is a three-phase system present (vapour and two liquids) with three (or more) components (A, S, and Imp where Imp denotes an impurity), and the impurities are partitioned between A and the mixture of S and P. This mixture is separated from A by decantation or syphoning, A is redissolved in S and reprecipitated by the addition of P. At all stages of this process the mixtures must be stirred efficiently but so gently that an emulsion is not formed. It happens quite often that an acid A with a melting point near or above ambient temperature will start to crystallise after the first or second extraction. 

Azeotropic Systems. An azeotropic system is one wherein two or more components have a constanl boiling point at a particular composition. Such mixtures cannot be separated by conventional distillation methods. If rhe constant boiling point is a minimum, the system is said lo exhibit negomv azeotropy if it is a maximum, positive azeotropy. Consider a mixture of water and alcohol in the presence of the vapor. This system of two phases and two components is divarianl. Now choose some fixed pressure and study the composition of the system at equilibrium us a function of temperature. The experimental results arc shown schematically in Fig. 5. 

Figure 6 is a graphic representation of foam structures in which the microspheres are dispersed randomly (a) and uniformly in close packing (b). In both structures, the two phases fill completely the whole volume (no dispersed air voids) and the density of the product is thus calculated from the relative proportions of the two. Measured density values often differ from the calculated ones, due to the existence of some isolated or interconnected, irregularly shaped voids as shown in Fig. 6c. The voids are usually an incidental part of the composite, as it is not easy to avoid their formation. Nevertheless, voids are often introduced intentionally to reduce the density below the minimum possible in a close-packed two-phase structure. In such three-phase systems the resin matrix is mainly a binding material, holding the structure of the microspheres together.

---