Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics reversible

Assuming again that the cycle kinetics are rapid and maintain enzyme and complex in a rapid quasi-steady state, we can obtain the steady state velocity for the reversible Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics ... 

Figure 4.2 Kinetic mechanism of a Michaelis-Menten enzyme. (A) The reaction mechanism for the irreversible case - Equation (4.1) - is based on a single intermediate-state enzyme complex (ES) and an irreversible conversion from the complex to free enzyme E and product P. (B) The reaction mechanism for the reversible case - Equation (4.7) - includes the formation of ES complex from free enzyme and product P. For both the irreversible and reversible cases, the reaction scheme is illustrated as a catalytic cycle.

Kinetic Model Reversible CYP inhibition is dependent on the mode of interaction between CYP enzymes and inhibitors and is further characterized as competitive, noncompetitive, uncompetitive, and mixed. Evaluation of reversible inhibition of CYP reactions is often conducted under conditions where Michaelis-Menten (MM) kinetics is obeyed. Based on Scheme 1 below, various types of reversible inhibition are described from the scheme during catalysis which can lead to enzyme inhibition ... 

Equation 11-15 is known as the Michaelis-Menten equation. It represents the kinetics of many simple enzyme-catalyzed reactions, which involve a single substrate. The interpretation of as an equilibrium constant is not universally valid, since the assumption that the reversible reaction as a fast equilibrium process often does not apply. 

Lenore Michaelis and Maud L. Menten proposed a general theory of enzyme action in 1913 consistent with observed enzyme kinetics. Their theory was based on the assumption that the enzyme, E, and its substrate, S, associate reversibly to form an enzyme-substrate complex, ES ... 

The inactivation is normally a first-order process, provided that the inhibitor is in large excess over the enzyme and is not depleted by spontaneous or enzyme-catalyzed side-reactions. The observed rate-constant for loss of activity in the presence of inhibitor at concentration [I] follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics and is given by kj(obs) = ki(max) [I]/(Ki + [1]), where Kj is the dissociation constant of an initially formed, non-covalent, enzyme-inhibitor complex which is converted into the covalent reaction product with the rate constant kj(max). For rapidly reacting inhibitors, it may not be possible to work at inhibitor concentrations near Kj. In this case, only the second-order rate-constant kj(max)/Kj can be obtained from the experiment. Evidence for a reaction of the inhibitor at the active site can be obtained from protection experiments with substrate [S] or a reversible, competitive inhibitor [I(rev)]. In the presence of these compounds, the inactivation rate Kj(obs) should be diminished by an increase of Kj by the factor (1 + [S]/K, ) or (1 + [I(rev)]/I (rev)). From the dependence of kj(obs) on the inhibitor concentration [I] in the presence of a protecting agent, it may sometimes be possible to determine Kj for inhibitors that react too rapidly in the accessible range of concentration. ... 

The kinetics of the general enzyme-catalyzed reaction (equation 10.1-1) may be simple or complex, depending upon the enzyme and substrate concentrations, the presence/absence of inhibitors and/or cofactors, and upon temperature, shear, ionic strength, and pH. The simplest form of the rate law for enzyme reactions was proposed by Henri (1902), and a mechanism was proposed by Michaelis and Menten (1913), which was later extended by Briggs and Haldane (1925). The mechanism is usually referred to as the Michaelis-Menten mechanism or model. It is a two-step mechanism, the first step being a rapid, reversible formation of an enzyme-substrate complex, ES, followed by a slow, rate-determining decomposition step to form the product and reproduce the enzyme ... 

Because of the complexity of biological systems, Eq. (1) as the differential form of Michaelis-Menten kinetics is often analyzed using the initial rate method. Due to the restriction of the initial range of conversion, unwanted influences such as reversible product formation, effects due to enzyme inhibition, or side reactions are reduced to a minimum. The major disadvantage of this procedure is that a relatively large number of experiments must be conducted in order to determine the desired rate constants. 

The scaled elasticities of a reversible Michaelis Menten equation with respect to its substrate and product thus consist of two additive contributions The first addend depends only on the kinetic propertiesand is confined to an absolute value smaller than unity. The second addend depends on the displacement from equilibrium only and may take an arbitrary value larger than zero. Consequently, for reactions close to thermodynamic equilibrium F Keq, the scaled elasticities become almost independent of the kinetic propertiesof the enzyme [96], In this case, predictions about network behavior can be entirely based on thermodynamic properties, which are not organism specific and often available, in conjunction with measurements of metabolite concentrations (see Section IV) to determine the displacement from equilibrium. Detailed knowledge of Michaelis Menten constants is not necessary. Along these lines, a more stringent framework to utilize constraints on the scaled elasticities (and variants thereof) as a determinant of network behavior is discussed in Section VIII.E. 

Another instance where first-order kinetics applies is the conversion of reversible enzyme-substrate complex (ES) to regenerate free enzyme (E) plus product (P) as part of the Michaelis-Menten scheme ... 

Also characteristic of enzymes that obey Michaelis-Menten kinetics is that suitable inhibitors can compete with the substrate for the enzyme active site, thus impeding the reaction. If the inhibitor binds reversibly to the enzyme active site, then the substrate can compete for the active site leading to competitive inhibition. To test for... 

In binding experiments, the affinity of magnesium ADP to native membranes and to the isolated calcium dependent ATPase was found to be considerably lower than that of magnesium ATP173. On the other hand, from the inhibition of the calcium-dependent ATPase or the activation of calcium release and ATP synthesis apparent affinities for ADP are obtained that are very similar to those of ATP (Fig. 12). The affinity of ADP for the enzyme apparently depends on its functional state. The affinity of ADP for the membranes under conditions of calcium release depends markedly on the pH of the medium. When the medium pH is reduced from 7.0 to 6.0, the affinity drops by a factor of 10. At pH 7.0 the affinity of the membrane for ADP corresponds to the affinity for ATP to the high affinity binding sites in the forward running mode of the pump. In contrast to the complex dependence of the forward reaction on the concentration of ATP, the dependence of the reverse reaction on ADP seems to follow simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics. 

Reversible Inhibition One common type of reversible inhibition is called competitive (Fig. 6-15a). A competitive inhibitor competes with the substrate for the active site of an enzyme. While the inhibitor (I) occupies the active site it prevents binding of the substrate to the enzyme. Many competitive inhibitors are compounds that resemble the substrate and combine with the enzyme to form an El complex, but without leading to catalysis. Even fleeting combinations of this type will reduce the efficiency of the enzyme. By taking into account the molecular geometry of inhibitors that resemble the substrate, we can reach conclusions about which parts of the normal substrate bind to the enzyme. Competitive inhibition can be analyzed quantitatively by steady-state kinetics. In the presence of a competitive inhibitor, the Michaelis-Menten equation (Eqn 6-9) becomes... 

Reversible inhibition occurs rapidly in a system which is near its equilibrium point and its extent is dependent on the concentration of enzyme, inhibitor and substrate. It remains constant over the period when the initial reaction velocity studies are performed. In contrast, irreversible inhibition may increase with time. In simple single-substrate enzyme-catalysed reactions there are three main types of inhibition patterns involving reactions following the Michaelis-Menten equation competitive, uncompetitive and non-competitive inhibition. Competitive inhibition occurs when the inhibitor directly competes with the substrate in forming the enzyme complex. Uncompetitive inhibition involves the interaction of the inhibitor with only the enzyme-substrate complex, while non-competitive inhibition occurs when the inhibitor binds to either the enzyme or the enzyme-substrate complex without affecting the binding of the substrate. The kinetic modifications of the Michaelis-Menten equation associated with the various types of inhibition are shown below. The derivation of these equations is shown in Appendix S.S. 

In relation to enzymic cytochrome P-450 oxidations, catalysis by iron porphyrins has inspired many recent studies.659 663 The use of C6F5IO as oxidant and Fe(TDCPP)Cl as catalyst has resulted in a major improvement in both the yields and the turnover numbers of the epoxidation of alkenes. 59 The Michaelis-Menten kinetic rate, the higher reactivity of alkyl-substituted alkenes compared to that of aryl-substituted alkenes, and the strong inhibition by norbornene in competitive epoxidations suggested that the mechanism shown in Scheme 13 is heterolytic and presumably involves the reversible formation of a four-mernbered Fev-oxametallacyclobutane intermediate.660 Picket-fence porphyrin (TPiVPP)FeCl-imidazole, 02 and [H2+colloidal Pt supported on polyvinylpyrrolidone)] act as an artificial P-450 system in the epoxidation of alkenes.663... 

Michaelis-Menten approach (Michaelis and Menten, 1913) It is assumed that the product-releasing step, Eq. (2.6), is much slower than the reversible reaction, Eq. (2.5), and the slow step determines the rate, while the other is at equilibrium. This is an assumption which is often employed in heterogeneous catalytic reactions in chemical kinetics.3 Even though the enzyme is... 

In an enzyme reaction, initially free enzyme E and free substrate S in their respective ground states initially combine reversibly to an enzyme-substrate (ES) complex. The ES complex passes through a transition state, AGj, on its way to the enzyme-product (EP) complex and then on to the ground state of free enzyme E and free product P. From the formulation of the reaction sequence, a rate law, properly containing only observables in terms of concentrations, can be derived. In enzyme catalysis, the first rate law was written in 1913 by Michaelis and Menten therefore, the corresponding kinetics is named the Michaelis-Menten mechanism. The rate law according to Michaelis-Menten features saturation kinetics with respect to substrate (zero order at high, first order at low substrate concentration) and is first order with respect to enzyme. 

The kinetic parameters for a free enzyme in solution are readily derived using the Michaelis-Menten approach describing pseudo-steady-state conversions. Consider Equation (31.1) representing the conversion of a substrate S into a product P, catalyzed by an enzyme E. The rate of formation of an enzyme/substrate complex, ES, is denoted as ku the reverse reaction by and the rate of subsequent conversion to the free product by k2. 

In a study of the highly purified alanine racemase of E. coli, Lambert and Neuhaus determined significant differences in the maximal velocities and the Michaelis-Menten constants of the substrates in the forward (L - dl) and reverse directions (d - dl) [37]. From these data the value calculated for Keq is 1.11 0.15. The time course of the reaction showed that in 10 min with L-alanine as substrate ca. 0.09 jumol of D-alanine were formed. With the same amount of enzyme (750 ng) and in the same time period, ca. 0.05 jamol of L-alanine were formed from D-alanine. Similar results have been reported for the same enzyme from S. faecalis and for proline racemases [37]. Thus, in these cases, there are definite kinetic differences, as expected for the existence of two diastereoisomers formed between enzyme and two substrate enantiomers. 

The formation of a reversible Michaelis-Menten-type complex of the enzyme and ferrocytochrome c [ES1S2 in Eq. (3) ] can be postulated from initial steady-state kinetics of the cytochrome c peroxidase reaction (17). Since cytochrome c peroxidase and cytochrome c are acidic and basic proteins, respectively, their interaction may be governed principally by electrostatic attraction. This assumption is further supported by the fact that several polycations which reversibly and irreversibly bind cytochrome c peroxidase inhibit its enzymic activity in competition with ferrocytochrome c 17,62). 

How can we determine whether a reversible inhibitor acts by competitive or noncompetitive inhibition Let us consider only enzymes that exhibit Michaelis- Menten kinetics. Measurements of the rates of catalysis at different concentrations of substrate and inhibitor serve to distinguish the three types of inhibition. In competitive inhibition, the inhibitor competes with the substrate for the active site. The dissociation constant for the inhibitor is given by... 

In textbooks dealing with enzyme kinetics, it is customary to distinguish four types of reversible inhibitions (i) competitive (ii) noncompetitive (iii) uncompetitive and, (iv) mixed inhibition. Competitive inhibition, e.g., given by the product which retains an affinity for the active site, is very common. Non-competitive inhibition, however, is very rarely encountered, if at all. Uncompetitive inhibition, i.e. where the inhibitor binds to the enzyme-substrate complex but not to the free enzyme, occurs also quite often, as does the mixed inhibition, which is a combination of competitive and uncompetitive inhibitions. The simple Michaelis-Menten equation can still be used, but with a modified Ema, or i.e. ... 

---