Micelles perturbation

Keto-enol equilibrium constants for simple /i-dicarbonyl compounds, RCOCH2COX (R = X = Me R = Me, Ph for X = OEt) have been measured in water1423 by a micelle perturbation method previously reported for benzoylacetone142b (R = Ph, X = Me). The results have been combined with kinetic data for nitrosation by NO+, C1NO, BrNO, and SCNNO in all cases, reaction with the enol was found to be rate limiting. 

The effects of cationic and zwitterionic micelles on the keto-enol tautomerism of 2-phenylacetyl-furan and -thiophene (73, X = O, S) have been studied in aqueous media.285 While the micelles perturb the equilibrium only slightly, the apparent acidity of one or other tautomer is increased, as the micelles have an affinity for the enolate. The systems also show lowered water rates at the minima of their pH-rate profiles, allowing an otherwise undetectable metal ion catalysis to be observed. 

Eqnation 4 shows that, at constant , a change of the external parameter/ affects not only the radins but also the concentration of water-containing reversed micelles. It is also of interest that, by increasing R, the fraction of bulklike water molecules located in the core (or the time fraction spent by each water molecule in the core) of spherical reversed micelles increases progressively, whereas the opposite occurs for perturbed water molecules located at the water-surfactant interface, as a consequence of the parallel decrease of the micellar surface-to-volume ratio. 

Aminophthalate anion Atmospheric pressure active nitrogen Analyte pulse perturbation-chemiluminescence spectroscopy Arthromyces rasomus peroxidase Ascorbic acid Adenosine triphosphate Avalanche photodiode 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl 2,6-Di-t< r/-bu(yl-4-mclhyl phenol Bioluminescence Polyoxyethylene (23) dodecanol Bovine serum albumin Critical micelle concentration Calf alkaline phosphatase Continuous-addition-of-reagent Continuous-addition-of-reagent chemiluminescence spectroscopy Catecholamines Catechol... 

With increasing temperature the CMC passes through a minimum (Fig. 15). The initial small decrease at low temperatures is due to a positive enthalpy of the micelle formation whereas the stronger increase of CMC towards higher temperatures is caused by a thermal perturbation of the emulsifier molecules in the micelles. The smaller influence of the temperature on the CMC in case of EUP indicates that these micelles are thermally more stable than SDS-micelles. 

Key questions in these treatments are the constancy of a (or P) and the nature of the reaction site at the micellar surface. Other questions are less troubling for example the equations include a term for the concentration of monomeric surfactant which is assumed to be given by the cmc, but cmc values depend on added solutes and so will be affected by the reactants. In addition submicellar aggregates may form at surfactant concentrations near the cmc and may affect the reaction rate. But these uncertainties become less important when [surfactant] > cmc and kinetic analyses can be made under these conditions. In addition, perturbation of the micelle by substrate can be reduced by keeping surfactant in large excess over substrate. 

Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) has been used to characterize the unimer-micelle distribution. However, SEC is not an absolute method and thus requires calibration. Since it is practically impossible to calibrate a SEC apparatus for the unimers and micelles formed by a block copolymer, only indicative MW values can be obtained. Moreover, several authors have noted a strong perturbation of the unimer-micelle equilibrium during SEC experiments even when interaction of the material with the SEC column was minimized [4,61,62],... 

The results of differential scanning calorimetry(DSC) indicate the change in aggregation state. The trans micelle showed a main endothermic peak at 14 2°C(A H =1.0 kcal/mol), corresponding to a gel-liquid crystal phase transition, whereas the transition temperature for the cis micelle appeared at 11.9°C( AH = 0.8 kcal/mol). This is unequivocal evidence that the trans-cis photoisomerization is a sufficient perturbation to alter the state of molecular aggregation. 

When binding of a substrate molecule at an enzyme active site promotes substrate binding at other sites, this is called positive homotropic behavior (one of the allosteric interactions). When this co-operative phenomenon is caused by a compound other than the substrate, the behavior is designated as a positive heterotropic response. Equation (6) explains some of the profile of rate constant vs. detergent concentration. Thus, Piszkiewicz claims that micelle-catalyzed reactions can be conceived as models of allosteric enzymes. A major factor which causes the different kinetic behavior [i.e. (4) vs. (5)] will be the hydrophobic nature of substrate. If a substrate molecule does not perturb the micellar structure extensively, the classical formulation of (4) is derived. On the other hand, the allosteric kinetics of (5) will be found if a hydrophobic substrate molecule can induce micellization. 

In order to test further the applicability of 1-pyrene carboxaldehyde as a fluorescent probe, we applied Keh and Valeur s method (4) to determine average micellar sizes of sulfonate A and B micelles. This method is based on the assumption that the motion of a probe molecule is coupled to that of the micelle, and that the micellar hydrodynamic volumes are the same in two apolar solvents of different viscosities. For our purposes, time averaged anisotropies of these systems were measured in two n-alkanes hexane and nonane. The fluorescence lifetime of 1-pyrene carboxaldehyde with the two sulfonates in both these solvents was found to be approximately 5 ns. The micellar sizes (diameter) calculated for sulfonates A and B were 53 5A and 82 lOA, respectively. Since these micelles possesed solid polar cores, they were probably more tightly bound than typical inverted micelles such as those of aerosol OT. Hence, it was expected that the probe molecules would not perturb the micelles to an extent which would substantially affect the micellar sizes measured. 

Yu et al. (1998) were able to increase tha/itno antifungal efLciency of amphotericin B while at the same time decreasing its hemolytic activity by loading the drug into polymeric micelles. It was suggested that polymeric micelles could stabilize amphotericin B against autooxidation and/or enhance membrane perturbation of fungal cells. 

Penetration enhancers have different mechanisms of action depending on their physicochemical properties. Some examples of penetration enhancers and their mechanisms are bile salts (micellization and solubilization of epithelial lipids), fatty acids such as oleic acid (perturbation of intracellular lipids) [25,26], azone (l-dodecylazacycloheptan-2-one) (increasing fluidity of intercellular lipids), and surfactants such as sodium lauryl sulfate (expansion of intracellular spaces). The complete list of enhancers and their mechanism of actions are discussed in detail in Chapter 10. 

The transition moment vector of va, S-O points between surfactant molecules, and is therefore extremely sensitive to surfactant-surfactant interactions. The enhanced perturbation of vas S-O indicates that the electrostatic interactions between the dissimilar headgroups reduces a0 sufficiently to "drive" rod micelle formation in mixtures of DTAC and SDS. 

---